zpool statuspool: HD_ARCHIVE_0009state: ONLINEstatus: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool canstill be used, but some features are unavailable.action: Upgrade the pool using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, thepool will no longer be accessible on older software versions.scan: resilvered 119G in 5h20m with 0 errors on Wed May 4 00:24:54 2016config:NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUMHD_ARCHIVE_0009 ONLINE 0 0 0mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0disk/by-id/dm-name-ZFS_ARCHIVE_0009f ONLINE 0 0 0disk/by-id/dm-name-ZFS_ARCHIVE_0009c ONLINE 0 0 0errors: No known data errorszpool detach HD_ARCHIVE_0009 disk/by-id/dm-name-ZFS_ARCHIVE_0009c
cannot detach disk/by-id/dm-name-ZFS_ARCHIVE_0009c: no such device in pool
zdb HD_ARCHIVE_0009 | less
Can you tell me whether this is a known issue with zfs-fuse or your version, or that I'm messing things up somewhere?zpool detach HD_ARCHIVE_0009 2748028746382267204cannot detach 2748028746382267204: no such device in pool
FYI, the next thing I'm planning to do with zfs-fuse is backport ZoL's zfs-dracut package so that I can get rootfs on zfs-fuse working without manual intervention.AFAICT zfs-fuse is sending an ioctl to flush the caches, but when ZFS is on partitions, it invokes it on partitions rather than underlying block devices. I'm not 100% sure but I think what it should be doing instead is a simple fsync() instead, but I'm not 100% sure, and the interest in zfs-fuse from experts like Emmanuel and Seth seems to be at an all time low. :-(
I would also love to figure out and fix whatever is causing this to flood my syslog:
zfs-fuse: sending ioctl 2285 to a partition!On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Durval Menezes <durval....@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Gordan,On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:26 PM, Durval Menezes <durval....@gmail.com> wrote:Sure, got them all here, and was about to clone your new git repository and compile some fresh packages here using it.Just cloned it and I'm having a look around. Found that on the top-level INSTALL file:Currently, it only works on the x86, amd64 and sparc64 architectures.Shouldn't this be updated to reflect the fact that it also runs fine on ARM?Cheers,
--Durval.