Of course they want to be the one and only even if they
often offer so little that the man looks elsewhere.
That being the case:-
Would they rather that 'their' man had a lasting and serious affair?
or
Would they rather have a Bill Clinton who spread his pleasures wide
and thin?
> or
Neither, Edward. I'd rather be alone.
--
Fran
ja...@zetnet.co.uk
> Of course they want to be the one and only
Everyone knows that *I* am the one and only. Huh!
> even if they
> often offer so little that the man looks elsewhere.
>
> That being the case:-
> Would they rather that 'their' man had a lasting and serious affair?
>
> or
>
> Would they rather have a Bill Clinton who spread his pleasures wide
> and thin?
I think they'd prefer someone loyal and dependable, and who doesn't
answer back.
No doubt it's the reason why I am not married.
What on earth brought this on, Edward?
Adrian
WWW WWW Adrian Gothard
WWW ww WWW White Horse Design
WWWWWWWWWW
WWWW WWWW w...@zetnet.co.uk, http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/whd
---
Designers of video capture/filter/processing systems for aircraft
> Neither, Edward. I'd rather be alone.
Thank you Zsa Zsa!
--
| |\_/|
Guy King |~~(o o) My mother warned me about
Hounslow, Middlesex | /=(Y)= loose cars and fast women.
guy....@zetnet.co.uk |(
www.users.zetnet.co.uk/gking/ | \
/snip/
> or
> Would they rather have a Bill Clinton who spread his pleasures wide
> and thin?
Judging by today's newspaper pictures, she is no longer thin.
APM
> Everyone knows that *I* am the one and only. Huh!
Hmmm!
> No doubt it's the reason why I am not married.
The only reason?
> What on earth brought this on, Edward?
Nothing old lad. Just an enquiring mind!
*************
The message <199811281...@zetnet.co.uk>
from Frances Patricia Amas <ja...@zetnet.co.uk> contains these words:
> Neither, Edward. I'd rather be alone.
What? No warmth at all? Lonely old life dear!
E.
> The message <199811281...@zetnet.co.uk>
> from Frances Patricia Amas <ja...@zetnet.co.uk> contains these words:
> > Neither, Edward. I'd rather be alone.
> Thank you Zsa Zsa!
Greta, shirley? And I agree.
Linda
> Of course they want to be the one and only even if they
> often offer so little that the man looks elsewhere.
You suggest only one answer, Edward. I suspect you'll find there are
as many different answers as there are different women!
--
Linda Sutherland
linda.su...@zetnet.co.uk
Thought it was Greta!
--
...ElaineJ... Visit Jones' Pages at http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/ejones
.on an Acorn. Corwen, North Wales; Steam Traction, with feature on Fodens;
..StrongArm.. Textures/Backdrops; Christmas GIFs (and Acorn Drawfiles)
...RISC PC... CMMGB with pics of pre- WW 1 Dawson & Yukon Volunteers.
>The message <36634a0a...@news.zetnet.co.uk>
> from w...@directors-1.zetnet.zet (Ag@whd) contains these words:
>
>> Everyone knows that *I* am the one and only. Huh!
> Hmmm!
It's also the opening music to "Doc Hollywood", a quite enjoyable film!
>> No doubt it's the reason why I am not married.
> The only reason?
Hmmm, I can't think of any others :-)
> The message <199811281...@zetnet.co.uk>
> from Frances Patricia Amas <ja...@zetnet.co.uk> contains these words:
> > Neither, Edward. I'd rather be alone.
> Thank you Zsa Zsa!
> --
>
> Guy King
Try Greta Garbo and you'd be correct!
--
Fran
ja...@zetnet.co.uk
The message <199811281...@zetnet.co.uk>
> from Frances Patricia Amas <ja...@zetnet.co.uk> contains these words:
> > Neither, Edward. I'd rather be alone.
> What? No warmth at all? Lonely old life dear!
> E.
Preferable to living with a man who shares his warmth around!
--
Fran
ja...@zetnet.co.uk
> Of course they want to be the one and only even if they
> often offer so little that the man looks elsewhere.
> That being the case:-
> Would they rather that 'their' man had a lasting and serious affair?
> or
> Would they rather have a Bill Clinton who spread his pleasures wide
> and thin?
I just want to love and be loved honestly and faithfully. And I want
forever to mean forever.
Everything else is negotiable in the end.
Sian
> I just want to love and be loved honestly and faithfully. And I want
> forever to mean forever.
> Everything else is negotiable in the end.
> Sian
So would you consider a fling with a married man then or not?. :)
Mark Trudgill..
> > I just want to love and be loved honestly and faithfully. And I want
> > forever to mean forever.
> > Everything else is negotiable in the end.
> > Sian
In an ideal World.
Christa
> You suggest only one answer, Edward. I suspect you'll find there are
> as many different answers as there are different women!
Indeed there are Linda. I was genuinely interested in what women
really want. Most of us expect too much from others and by the answers
'provoked' it seems that most women want all or nothing.
Fair enough but the fact that the 'mistress' exists proves that, like
most of us, women will make the best of a bad job.
This thread has caused distress to at least one zetnet subscriber who
has e-mailed me and is, at the moment, extremely vulnerable. I deeply
regret that and wholeheartedly apologise for any offence caused.
Edward.
> I just want to love and be loved honestly and faithfully. And I want
> forever to mean forever.
> Sian
You have been watching too much Disney.
Serial polygamy is by far the best
option, but I don't know where that
would leave you, being of the female
sort.
Stubbsy stu...@zetnet.co.uk
<:)(((((><<
> This thread has caused distress to at least one zetnet subscriber who
> has e-mailed me and is, at the moment, extremely vulnerable. I deeply
> regret that and wholeheartedly apologise for any offence caused.
> Edward.
Edward, I don't think it is a good idea to
gratuitously attack an individual's known
sensibilities, but neither do I think that
anyone should mentally run through the list
of suscribers to satisfy themselves that they
are not going to offend anyone.
Someone will always be offended by something,
that is just the way of things. I think
most people understand this. As many of the
threads are on controversial subjects it is
inevitable that people will read things that
may upset them.
All the best,
Stubbsy stu...@zetnet.co.uk
<:)(((((><<
> Indeed there are Linda. I was genuinely interested in what women
> really want. Most of us expect too much from others and by the answers
> 'provoked' it seems that most women want all or nothing.
> Fair enough but the fact that the 'mistress' exists proves that, like
> most of us, women will make the best of a bad job.
> Edward.
>
What do you mean by "all or nothing"? If you mean fidelity in what
is apparently a close and loving relationship, then you're absolutely
correct. Why should any woman accept that her partner has a mistress?
Would you accept it if your wife or partner chose to have a
relationship with another man? I rather doubt it.
--
Fran
ja...@zetnet.co.uk
> > The message from Sian Lindsey <nigh...@zetnet.co.uk> contains these words:
> > > I just want to love and be loved honestly and faithfully. And I want
> > > forever to mean forever.
> > > Everything else is negotiable in the end.
> > > Sian
> In an ideal World.
> Christa
Yeah, like the one I lived in until recently.
Sian
> > What? No warmth at all? Lonely old life dear!
> > E.
> Preferable to living with a man who shares his warmth around!
I think this would be by far the most often held opinion - and not
just by women. I do think there are a lot of couples who stay
together just because it maintains their standard of living, i.e.
assuming they own their property 50-50, they can afford to live
somewhere twice as expensive together as they would alone.
Gary
> The message <199811291...@zetnet.co.uk>
> from Sian Lindsey <nigh...@zetnet.co.uk> contains these words:
> > I just want to love and be loved honestly and faithfully. And I want
> > forever to mean forever.
> > Everything else is negotiable in the end.
> > Sian
> So would you consider a fling with a married man then or not?. :)
> Mark Trudgill..
I'm pleading the 5th (Amendment, Anne) again.
Sian
> Try Greta Garbo and you'd be correct!
Garbo, Gabor, what do I know, they wre both well before my time, and
I've never been one for ogling film stars.
> The message <199811282...@zetnet.co.uk>
> from Linda Sutherland <linda.su...@zetnet.co.uk> contains these words:
> > You suggest only one answer, Edward. I suspect you'll find there are
> > as many different answers as there are different women!
...........................8-<
> This thread has caused distress to at least one zetnet subscriber who
> has e-mailed me and is, at the moment, extremely vulnerable. I deeply
> regret that and wholeheartedly apologise for any offence caused.
Can I lighten this a little for you Edward by giving the compromise
that my wife and I have worked out;
SHE "Have I told you today that I love you?"
ME "No"
SHE "Well I do"
........later
SHE "You never tell ME that you love me".
Now she knows full well that I will remind her that I did make just
such a statement to her last Christmas (or whenever it last was) and
nothing has changed since then.
Harmony reigns.
HTH John.
> > > Everything else is negotiable in the end.
> > > Sian
> > So would you consider a fling with a married man then or not?. :)
> > Mark Trudgill..
> I'm pleading the 5th (Amendment, Anne) again.
> Sian
So not totally out of the question then. :)
I came across your well Bills website the otherday, I thought you had
erased all existence of this relationship.
I noticed you are in northampton at the listening station. I know
this place quite well but have never been in the place.
I was nearly killed there on the long downhill drag coming from the
M1 just outside the place.
There are some laybys at the side of the road here and whilst
traveling in an old Ford transit van with crappy brakes the car in
front slammed his brakes on in the middle of the road, I just swerved
to avoid him nearly hitting a convoy of large trucks coming from the
opposite direction.
I pulled in front of this prat who turned out to be one of the young
sirs (officer) at the RAF base there. He was driving a small MG
sports car and his excuse was his friend had stopped on the layby
there. Why he couldn't have done the same I dont know as this thing
goes on for miles and has plenty room and could have reversed back to him.
As you can proberbly tell, I wasn't in a friendly mood and proceeded
to yell at him quite alot. He just sat in his car winding up the
window cowering away, Which is just as well really as if he'd made
any attempt to get out the car I think I'd have slapped him silly.
This was seen by everyone behind me and by this time all the traffic
had come to a standstill and they were all shouting at him as they drove past.
Neither of you looked as I expected you to, about the only thing Bill
and I have in common is that neither of us has a peeled helmet. :)
I pictured you more of a mousey blonde with gold rimmed glasses, Why
I dont know you just sound like you should.
Lucky you eh getting Colarado, one of these days I'll get out there
and do one of the cattle drives they do there, I really quite fancy
that but doubt I'd want to do it for a living but it would be an
experience if nothing else I might learn to ride a horse.
All the best now.
Mark..
> The message <199811291...@zetnet.co.uk>
> from Edward Sparkes <spa...@zetnet.co.uk> contains these words:
> > The message <199811282...@zetnet.co.uk>
> > from Linda Sutherland <linda.su...@zetnet.co.uk> contains these words:
> > > You suggest only one answer, Edward. I suspect you'll find there are
> > > as many different answers as there are different women!
Er.....Yes!
> Can I lighten this a little for you Edward by giving the compromise
Trouble is John, that Linda is right. They often are you know and
if they are
not it can be wise not to notice. Napoleon was no coward. Well
when he was
young he wasn't. He opined that the only victory in love is in retreat.
Cynical was he not. He is said to have had over recorded love 100 affairs.
Surely it must have been more than that.
> Harmony reigns.
> HTH John.
Long may it last. Once a year need not hurt too much. ;)
Best regards. Edward
What happened to it?
> >Yeah, like the one I lived in until recently.
> What happened to it?
The glass broke and the fish fell out. Literally.
Sian
--
"Reality continues to ruin my life." ... Calvin (of Calvin and Hobbes)
|\ _,,,---,,_ nigh...@zetnet.co.uk
/,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ kara...@aol.com
|,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' http://members.aol.com/karacanim
'---''(_/--' `-'\_)
> > Try Greta Garbo and you'd be correct!
> Garbo, Gabor, what do I know, they wre both well before my time, and
> I've never been one for ogling film stars.
> --
> Guy King
It shows!
--
Fran
ja...@zetnet.co.uk
> > Neither, Edward. I'd rather be alone.
> Thank you Zsa Zsa!
> --
That was Greta Garbo, wasn't it?
....Karen
> Garbo, Gabor, what do I know, they wre both well before my time, and
> I've never been one for ogling film stars.
> --
I came in late and everyone has corrected you already. What did Zsa
Zsa say? Anything?
../...Karen
> I came in late and everyone has corrected you already. What did Zsa
> Zsa say? Anything?
> ../...Karen
I think "I do", going by the number of marriages!
--
Fran
ja...@zetnet.co.uk
> I came in late and everyone has corrected you already. What did Zsa
> Zsa say? Anything?
According to some - that she was a good housekeeper: after each divorce
she kept the house.
> I came in late and everyone has corrected you already. What did Zsa
> Zsa say? Anything?
"I will" and then a few months later "Oh no I won't!"
Gary
> I came in late and everyone has corrected you already. What did Zsa
> Zsa say? Anything?
Darrliing!
Stubbsy stu...@zetnet.co.uk
<:)(((((><<
> > I came in late and everyone has corrected you already. What did Zsa
> > Zsa say? Anything?
It certaily wasn't "I vant to be alone" !!
> According to some - that she was a good housekeeper: after each divorce
> she kept the house.
That is quite a coincidence - I went a restaurant this evening, prior
to a concert, and that quote - attributed to Zsa Zsa herself - was
written on one of the beams above our table!
JG
> You have been watching too much Disney.
> Serial polygamy is by far the best
> option, but I don't know where that
> would leave you, being of the female
> sort.
Got it wrong again Stubbsy!! "Polyandry" is the answer! <BBG>
Anne
> > So would you consider a fling with a married man then or not?. :)
> I'm pleading the 5th (Amendment, Anne) again.
Thanks Sian! I would have known, as you said "Pleading" not
"Taking" this time! <G>
Anne
> I think "I do", going by the number of marriages!
<lol> I think you maybe right, Fran!
....Karen
> Darrliing!
That was it! Nice one, Stubbsy!
....Karen
> > I came in late and everyone has corrected you already. What did Zsa
> > Zsa say? Anything?
> Darrliing!
>
> Stubbsy stu...@zetnet.co.uk
>
> <:)(((((><<
I thought Zsa Zsa said 'Dahlink' or is that Ivana Trump?
Christa
> I thought Zsa Zsa said 'Dahlink' or is that Ivana Trump?
> Christa
I think you're right there, Christa. Both came from the same neck of
the woods I believe, Hungary or something
--
Fran
ja...@zetnet.co.uk
> The message <199811291...@zetnet.co.uk>
> from Gerald L R Stubbs <stu...@zetnet.co.uk> contains these words:
> > You have been watching too much Disney.
> > Serial polygamy is by far the best
> > option, but I don't know where that
> > would leave you, being of the female
> > sort.
> Got it wrong again Stubbsy!! "Polyandry" is the answer! <BBG>
> Anne
In order to propogate the species, it is
a poor substitute for polygamy.
Unknown, as far as I know, in the animal
world.
BTW, In the post above I had meant to
write 'Serial rolling polygamy'
--
Stubbsy stu...@zetnet.co.uk
<:)(((((><<
> I thought Zsa Zsa said 'Dahlink' or is that Ivana Trump?
> Christa
Neither, that was in 'Dr. Who'
Stubbsy stu...@zetnet.co.uk
<:)(((((><<