Hi Martin,
currently we don't plan to do that. Our beliefs are:
- if there doesn't exist some semi-authoritative source of information
for that entity, than there is no 'meaning' in having a unique
identifier. Any url we return can be used for exactly the same purpose -
in this case http://www.theawl.com would be an identifier. Or you can
use the Amazon's url for that purpose.
- minting new entities that don't have specific well defined meaning is
a bit pointless. You can do it on your side too.
Hope this helps.... and we're always open for discussion.
bye
andraz
Yeah, however what I am saying is use urls, not anchors for comparisons.
>
> One thing I'm still wondering about though: if the same entity is
> extracted from different text (with a different anchor etc), will it
> always have all the same URL identifiers? So can it happen that one
> time I get both dbpedia and wikipedia links for say "zemanta" entity,
> and some other text only returns me a dbpedia link but not wikipedia?
> (basically that comes down to the question if those urls are matched
> by some identifier in your internal database i guess :))
yes they will have the same urls.
we could add or remove some urls to the list as we aggregate more
databases or find that one wasn't accurate enough, etc.
> Also, the "title" returned with an "url" can change based source, or?
> So if the Wikipedia article about something slightly adjusts it's
> title (or adds some identifier after it, like "(band)") will the title
> change as well? Actually, in that case the url will change as well..
> even if it's the same entity :x *arg*
Wikipedia rarely changes the titles of established entities. So no worry
about that :)
bye
andraz