X Force Keygen Revit 2014 Download
Kenneth Calimlim
I'm loading a family that is giving me the error "Invalid column unit type: POUNDS" A second message says "Could not parse column header:Unit Weight" With Revit 2020 the family works fine. When loading the Revit family on Revit 2021 I get that error. I checked my units and The only difference is that Revit 20 has Pounds per cubic foot but in Revit 2021 it has Pounds force per cubic feet for the Unit weight units. I'm not sure if there is a way to change the units to not include the force part, oo if I can edit the parameter text file to include it so maybe Revit can read the Unit weight properly. I'm not sure if the force part is messing up with the family but that's the only thing I can think of. Any help is appreciated, thanks.
I have seen it before and it typically means that Revit is asking for a value and something else is typed in. The last time I saw this message I had to go through all the code and check everything individually to make sure there were no typos. Unfortunately, the text scripts are not like typical code where you can use the compiler to give you a general idea of where the code is wrong.
@RIPENG and @casquatch provided some batch solutions to the Type Catalog conversion issue. I'd recommend implementing these until such potential future where Autodesk provides some version of the service themselves.
I am aware of the change and I was able to resolve the issue a long time ago. it looks like someone else is having a similar issue. Unfortunately, it looks like making the change to the new format didn't work for them.
I mentioned the same in one of the posts and also @iainsavage gave a few other things that could be wrong. Unfortunately, the txt format being used doesn't give you much help to try to narrow down the parts of the code the program doesn't like. I spend a few hours getting rid of that error the last time I had it.
I noticed that Revit is very reluctant to update these views after loading updated information with my plugins. The views remain the same, even if the parameter values are indeed changed and the filter should kick in.
I guess that starting from the shared parameters I touch, which I know, I could check for filters using those parameters and from there, I could check which views uses those filters... but once there, should I fake a filter change? Or there is a easier way to force to regen the views?
Recently I had the same weird behaviour when creating materials and assigning them to revit elements or family geometry. They were not displayed correctly until I manually modified material. It would be great to understand the reason of such behaviour. Perhaps our cases are related.
Experiencing the same issue here. I'm using color filters based on two shared family parameters in my electrical equipment, and sometimes as I move around the view the panels just disappear. I can hover over them to highlight them and select them, but otherwise there's no indication they are there unless you have them tagged. I tried doc.Regenerate(), UIDocument.RefreshActiveView, and adjusting the uiview.zoom, but none of them worked. I noticed that other simple changes like adjusting the crop view forced a refresh. Simply toggling it on and off seemed to do the trick for me. Luckily the crop view can't be controlled by view templates either, so the code is pretty simple, though it does require it to be nested in a transaction.
@m.cicognani, I think I have a solution for this. I was experiencing the same issue only when editing a Shared Project Parameter assigned to a family category (curtain panels in my case): the View Filter would not respond automatically without a "refresh" trick as others have mentioned above.
In the family editor, adding the same Shared Parameter to the curtain panel family itself, as well as all shared families nested within, my View Filter now responds live to any changes I make to the shared parameter in my project.
Can I suggest you open the model with only one workset open, it sounds like you aren't using worksets so teh default workset is workset1 close this and open the file, it should open faster then force relinquish
at is the risk anytime you force relinquish. It's a trade off, either you need to force as the user forgot or missed syncing and your mow stuck and can't work, or you wait for the user to return and sync, if you have the users logon details you can relinquish for them. If the users is a experienced user they should know to sync every max 1/5 hour, if they didn't then their work is "at risk' anyway.
So either they lose their work, which could happen if they don't sync often (model can go out of date if lots of others are editing the model) and you continue your work or you wait, currently these are the only options, unless someone else has something which is an alternative. (Would love to know if there is another option
From the value, looks like Revit takes the loading value in GH (1,000,000) as feet, and convert it to km in Revit (304.8). I wonder has anyone faced this issue before? If so how did you solve it? Thank you very much
In my case, I need to times my force value from Grasshopper by 1,000,000 to make it becomes kN in Revit. Is this always the case? (Meaning the default force unit when we push data from GH to Revit is miliNewton?)
The idea behind that is that you can operate with those values and lengths that come from Rhino model assuming lengths are always in Rhino model units, mm in your case, and SI units for the rest of magnitudes.
It appears that a fair number of firms are deploying "even" years and skipping the "odd" years. The larger the scope of deployment seems to have some influence over that choice. I've been working with 2021 in smaller situations though, wishing it were true everywhere...I digress.
Wishing it were that simple, we are still running into it. Naturally there is another ARTICLE that mentions they are still researching the issue but that using Force Relinquish (BIM 360 Manage Cloud Models option) can cause this situation too. This requires us to clear the collaboration cache for a user who has forced us (haha) to use Force Relinquish. We are still in the diagnosis phase ourselves so we're not convinced of anything yet.
"This is happening because somebody has used Manage Cloud Models to force relinquish that user from that link, which breaks the link in the host model for the affected user."
"Note: Force Relinquish is a destructive operation and should be used sparingly! It is intended to be used as a last resort when the user to be relinquished is unavailable for some reason."
"If someone has been forced out through Force Relinquish, then all the changes that they have not synced, become orphaned and lost. While the central model will be unaffected by the use, people can lose work (and have to close and reopen the model which will be slow)."
"It is better for the user to open the model and use Relinquish All Mine to relinquish their permissions rather than using the Manage Cloud Models dialog."
It would be nice if employees didn't quit and go elsewhere or earn a dismissal. It would be nice if 3rd party applications didn't need to borrow a workset on our behalf and then refuse to return a workset without our knowledge. It would be nice is 3rd party applications that do automation didn't require their own username to run quietly in the background and then fail to return a workset from time to time.
Right now clearing a workset conflict in Revit Server projects is not nice. BIM 360 at least has Force Relinquish...but now we're told you really shouldn't use it because it might wreck your linked model paths. It starts the kind of internal conversations that make EyeTee license management "heads spin". Nobody wants users to start sharing log in credentials do they?
Thank you for posting this. This has been a known problem for months and it has affected multiple models in our firm. In a big, multi-office firm, where everyone is working from home, it has been nearly impossible to get the word out to every corner of the firm that users should not force-relinquish users under almost any circumstances. But there is no way to curb the user who is working late, discovers that someone left without relinquishing, and so searches the internet for "force relinquish BIM 360". I'm so angry with Autodesk that they didn't take down these pages on force relinquishing the moment they understood what a problem this is. On a large project this can takes hours to fix not to mention the countless hours of work lost for the project team. It's been months since Autodesk first posted their difficult-to-find mea culpa about this issue claiming that they were working on a solution. The least they could do is to take down all the (easy-to-find) instructions on how to force relinquish.
It's possible to select apps to not throttle in nVidia's Program Settings area. I know with other real time rendering apps this can really help. Is there a way to point it to the Enscape Revit Plugin to force this max performance? Is this path to an Enscape exe that nVidia will recognize?
angelo_arch , be aware that you can also adjust your settings that the maximum performance will be used for any 3D application - furthermore though, usually these settings don't make too much of a difference. If you activate it the GPU will run on full power constantly instead of throttling down when less performance intense tasks are run (when looking at the Sky in Enscape as an example) at the expense of more electricity cost.
b1e95dc632