Hi Simon, this question comes at an amazing time for me. I am a QA tester so unlike many of the individuals in your forums I'm not a developer but I do work with them :)
My development team are looking for a few things that would help them have confidence in the reports we are reviewing from the scans.
1. We now recognize that all of the alerts are grouped by the Plugin id.
2. If there is only 1 instance found for an Alert, using the PluginID to customize an Alert so that the comments persist for all new executions would not be a problem if there is only 1 instance or evidence found. However, like this example, the comments we need to add to the Other Info field against the Plugin id would not apply to the solution for every instance. We need a way to isolate comments so if we could either reference the URL, or the evidence information or a different indicator that gives us the ability to add a comment to the appropriate instance in the Alert that would be great.
3. If I could personally speak with someone that would be great for me because our company is also interested in using Zap to also execute the Attack function and I have been asked to look into doing that. I would also like to know what the difference in the report would look like when doing a passive assessment versus an attack.
Thank you in advance.