|
•
You have chosen the blank card and need to consult your inner truth
about this rather than the oracle. Perhaps this area is still unformed,
or perhaps you already know the answer but are consulting the oracle as
if you didn't.
It is the unformed aspects of life that create room for free will.
Paracelsus, the great alchemist, said that we are here to "finish
nature." We are subcreators, here to bring form out of the formless. In
writing this card, I am bringing form out of the formless mass of zeros
and ones from which the card arises. This card indicates an area of
formlessness that you are called upon to give form to.
Often we tend to think that the answer to what troubles us lies fully
formed somewhere, and we need only seek out that fully formed answer
through an oracle or some other means. But perhaps we are, as George W.
Bush would say, "The Decider." It is not for something outside of us to
supply the answer; it is for us to choose the answer. Some people fall
for what I call the "museum curator fallacy." Perceiving that there is
something sacred about the universe, they feel that they don't dare
touch anything or change anything or interfere with anything. They
become like a member of a Star Trek away team with an over fussy sense
of the prime directive. What people caught by the museum curator
fallacy forget is that they are not outside of the glass case, they are
in it, and that they were designed by nature to be interventionist
alchemists.
•
Another classic mistake people make is what I call the "single
correct diagnosis fallacy." According to this fallacy, there is a
single correct diagnosis of what is going on in a given situation. But
we know from quantum physics that the universe is not as cut and dried
as that. An electron is not in any particular place; it is more like a
cloud of probabilities. Interpretation of what is going on is often a
choice, a choice that generates a timeline. For example, a friend of
mine had his wallet stolen. Unconsciously defaulting to the single
correct diagnosis fallacy, he assumed that he was the victim of a
random, meaningless misfortune. From the rationalistic point of view,
this diagnosis was the most reasonable interpretation. From the point
of view of Occam's Razor, the random misfortune diagnosis was the
simplest explanation, and therefore, logically, the one most likely to
be true. But there are other ways to judge truth than logical
efficiency. Although one could make the strongest logical case for the
random misfortune diagnosis, it was a truth that was both aesthetically
displeasing and disempowering. By choosing the logically efficient
random misfortune diagnosis my friend gained absolutely nothing but a
demoralized sense of being a random victim. I suggested an alternative
diagnosis, that the loss of the wallet was a synchronicity. In dreams,
I pointed out, the loss of a wallet often means a need to shed an old
identity as our wallets are full of ID that supposedly tell who we are.
The loss of the wallet was a painful but synchronistic shock, I
proposed, to awaken him to the need to shed an old identity that no
longer served him. Since this related to things my friend was going
through, this new interpretive choice was felt by him to be very
empowering and it allowed the painful shock to become a catalyst for
his metamorphosis.
Consider that the truth is sometimes unformed and waiting for you to
choose an interpretation that will govern the ensuing timeline.
Consider this a propitious moment of unformed space, a propitious
moment for you to give form to the formless.
• See: Temporal Fencing and Life Fields
|