Re: Are the "Boeremag two" freedom fighters?!
Skokkie
"Steve Hayes" <haye...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fg2fs2155kql05eft...@4ax.com...
> On 5 Feb 2007 10:28:37 -0800, "Schorsch" <bart...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >On 5 Feb, 19:11, "jackmehoff" <jackmehof...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> "Schorsch" <bartel...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >>
> >> news:1170682260.5...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> >>
> >> > On Feb 5, 1:36 pm, "jack mehoff" <jackmehof...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> Yes, if you mean they are fighting against freedom.
> >>
> >> > I see the internet at the asylum is working again.....
> >>
> >> That was a very weak attempt...even for you Schorsch.
> >
> >So its even a weak attempt that can put you on your place, moron.
>
> And that answers the question.
>
I cannot understand why the post sent by Jack Mehoff in response to Schorsh
was deleted from the server, but the slightly older one by Steve Hayes was
allowed to remain. Is someone actively censoring this group? Under what
authority? Jack Mehoff has as much right to respond to ad hominems as
everyone else. The interactive flaming that goes on is more or less
consensual so who has the right to interfere?
Steve Hayes
>
>"Steve Hayes" <haye...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:fg2fs2155kql05eft...@4ax.com...
>> On 5 Feb 2007 10:28:37 -0800, "Schorsch" <bart...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 5 Feb, 19:11, "jackmehoff" <jackmehof...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> "Schorsch" <bartel...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> >>
>> >> news:1170682260.5...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>> >>
>> >> > On Feb 5, 1:36 pm, "jack mehoff" <jackmehof...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Yes, if you mean they are fighting against freedom.
>> >>
>> >> > I see the internet at the asylum is working again.....
>> >>
>> >> That was a very weak attempt...even for you Schorsch.
>> >
>> >So its even a weak attempt that can put you on your place, moron.
>>
>> And that answers the question.
>>
>
>I cannot understand why the post sent by Jack Mehoff in response to Schorsh
>was deleted from the server, but the slightly older one by Steve Hayes was
>allowed to remain. Is someone actively censoring this group? Under what
>authority?
Perhaps we should move this to alt.conspiracy now.
> Jack Mehoff has as much right to respond to ad hominems as
>everyone else. The interactive flaming that goes on is more or less
>consensual so who has the right to interfere?
It would be better if all ad hominems were responded to here.
Reading the opinion of someone I've never met about someone else I have never
met is downright boring.
>
--
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk