Reapeatedly my ISP [ABSA] is o.o. over the weekend.
And for several months the NewsGroup:
comp.os.linux.networking
shows only my posts.
This was previously a high volume group, and must
have become locally-isolated.
Based on previous experience that 'technical support'
only knows how to read from their question-sheet, any
attempt to report the fault is only likely to promote the
pending nervous break down.
Apparently much/all of the NewsGroups are locally
centralised ? If so then not only *.saix.* has this problem.
Do any other ZA users have local access to this group ?
Thanks foe info,
== Chris Glur.
> Like health-services, law & justice-departmemt, banking
> Do any other ZA users have local access to this group ?
yes and no - it seems my last postings in 2004/2005 was the only ones here
in this gorup. Bit i come from european inet...
My postings asked about existing interests in starting/growing
Linux-User-Groups (LUG) with international partnerships to some of us in SA
and/or especially in cape town. No answers come - but a lot of spammers
posted their porn and ads shit here...
I would be happe to hear from some real linux / Unix users - private or
companies wich are fiddelng with open source here (in the za.unis.misc)
again ~;).
hth
greetings,
Niels Dettenbach.
http://www.syndicat.com
http://www.syndicat.co.za
I can also see you, but all the za. related newsgroups seem to very quiet
lately?? Maybe newsgroups are not the prefferred way communicating anymore??
I donno, havent been on myself in quite a long time.
Regards
Mars
<ne...@absamail.co.za> wrote in message
news:sqqdnbmvTdUQoHzZ...@is.co.za...
I love it all the time.
doc
In article <eeb5mp$i72$1...@newsreader02.ops.uunet.co.za> CMHQ
<in...@minds.co.za> wrote:
>I can also see you, but all the za. related newsgroups seem to very
>quiet lately?? Maybe newsgroups are not the prefferred way
>communicating anymore?? I donno, havent been on myself in quite a long
>time.
Yes, more and more people prefer to log into 100 different websites and
sit there waiting forever for each message to load, so that they can
top-reply [that presupposes there is any quoting at all] with a long and
incoherent missive that the website swallows when they accidentally
press the "back" button in their browser. Oh, and they can't easily
tell who wrote what either, each message is just a "comment" to the top
article.
I can't imagine why people would ever want to participate in newsgroups.
- --
On choosing companies to invest in on stock market:
"Choose one...
that even an idiot can run because one day an idiot will!" - Warren Buffet
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Please fetch my new key 804177F8 from hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net/
iD8DBQFFEAtJwyMv24BBd/gRAlrtAJ0S2INVfi3WBjA3C4h3PgKSQIu82wCgoDz6
hIp597GKyVPGyIyw/CxixYo=
=I8ug
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----