Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

OUR NEW WORLD

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Huge Cajones Remailer

unread,
Mar 30, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/30/97
to

WELCOME TO YOUR NEW WORLD ORDER!

By David Silver - a student at the Washington State University

Kindly submitted by Euro-American Students' Union

The extermination of all nationalism. The extermination of all racial consciousness. The extermination of race. A one-world government ruled by very few, a very select minority.

We will eliminate any and all distinctions between people, because we will outlaw racism. We will live where White is Black, Black is White, and they will muddle into grey shortly thereafter. We will live where men and women are by all means the same, except in anatomy, because we will outlaw sexism. We will be subject to massive Third World integration, in the name of equality.

We will live in police states. We will be required to carry standardized identification cards. We will lose all facets of our civil liberties because there will be no one to stop the government from taking them. Political organizations will be outlawed under the pseudonym "hate-groups." We will convince ourselves that in order to be safe, we must disarm ourselves. And those who don't want to be disarmed will go to prison. They will be charged with conspiracy or some other fraudulent offense, and be erased from our memory.

We will be told by the propaganda administrators that despite the falling standard of living, we are prospering. We will justify this with the concept of a one-world economy. As our standard of living falls, Malaysia's will rise, and we will be told this is for the better (in the name of future "free-trade"). And we will believe it.

Our government will be controlled by the same people who control our media, as it is to a large degree today. The masses will vote in what is called a "democracy," but they will be told how to vote by their newspapers, televisions, and radios.

Independent thought will be discouraged, so that we might not get the wrong idea. Those who do get the wrong idea will suffer the same fate as the person who didn't want to give up his guns.

We will amuse ourselves with the tiny spectrum of right and left wing politics. We will choose between two people who serve the same purpose in all elections. And we won't care.

We will amuse ourselves with our television, the food on our tables, and the food in our refrigerators. No, we won't care a moment about anything until these things are gone. Then. we will vent our frustration by saying we should have elected the other guy, even though it would have made no difference. And we will not realize that everything we see on it was put there for a reason. Everything!

We will not determine the social conditions which will be reflected on our screens. Our screens will determine the social conditions reflected in real life. We will believe that since the media is so huge, surely all points of view must be represented somewhere. But they will not be. We will, again , amuse ourselves with the tiny spectrum of what our masters say is acceptable. And we will still be none the wiser.

We are following ourselves to slip into this decay right now, and it is almost surely too late to stop it. You will hear more about those violent and dangerous militias, extremists, hate-mongers, and nationalists so that you will be conditioned to react acceptably to their existence, you will, of course, hate them. Your children will hate them, and you will enact laws to eradicate them.

We will cripple any government that might pose a threat so we may "restore Democracy," or "preserve human rights." We have no more right to turn China into a democracy than they do to turn us into a Communist state,whether or not you agree with their policies. I can assure you, the same "human rights violations" occur in Israel (the recipients of which are Palestinians), perhaps even to a greater degree, but we hear nothing of them. There is a reason for this good-guy/bad-guy impression you receive(from the media), and it is to garner support for the interests of that same elite who will one day rule the world.

We are being fooled. We are being lied to. And we don't care. As long as we have our easy chairs and MNET or SKY to keep us company, we will believe that everything's all right. The only problems we really face are those which we are told to be concerned about.

This is a wake-up call. If we don't speak up now, we never will. In the future, we will not be able to. So we may outlaw hate-speech (which is a term with infinite inaleability, and no clear definition). Democracy is the right to say what you think as long as your masters don't disgree with it.

Welcome to your slave-state. Welcome to the New World Order. Ain't life GREAT in the New South Africa?


Guess Who

unread,
Apr 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM4/7/97
to

In article <1997033017...@fat.doobie.com>, nob...@huge.cajones.com
says...

>Welcome to your slave-state. Welcome to the New World Order. Ain't life
GREAT in the New South Africa?
>

Hey man, what's wrong with u ?

Would u like to live in a world where u can't travel in peace all
around our own country without showing a discriminating Id card?
Would u like to live in a world where our country is the Devil's country?
Would u like to live in a world where nobody does care about the future of
anything related to your country, so your family and friends?
Would u like to live in a country where the majority's only needs is the
civil war to stop apartheid ?
Would u like to be an alien from Hell in this world ?

So, reflect twice before saying bullshits like that !!!!

Words...


Sabsy

unread,
Apr 7, 1997, 3:00:00 AM4/7/97
to

Here is the full post that started this whole issue (a week away from one
year)
1st post on the subject:

Subject: Re: Language in SA
From: e...@ix.netcom.com(Errol Back-Cunningham )
Date: 1996/04/15
Message-Id: <4ku08v$f...@dfw-ixnews3.ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.south-africa,za.politics
[More Headers]

The question is: Who benefits from keeping all the peoples of South
Africa
linguistically seperate? Those with vested interests in the status quo
obviously. But who has vested interests?

Insofar as it seems that a large percentage of the middle to upper ANC
hierarchy consists of individuals who have dual roles - ie chiefs,
sub-chiefs
of various clans - generally aristocracy - the term Democratic Monarchy
does not seem to be out of place.

These individuals have a lot to gain by keeping the status quo in
place.
I mean what is the point of being king if you don't have any peasants
tied to the land? This of course would also be something that big
business would like - cheap labour etc.

Therefore, comparatively poor education would be a mechanism for doing
this. And of course, it is not too far a leap to assume that, one group
may
persist in attempting to get the best education for their group while
denying another. So, who are all these people that cry out about
culture
and tradition whenever the issue of one language that facilitates
learning
is raised, and what is their interest in maintaining the status quo?

I think that another revolution is needed - one that really hands the
power to
the people, not to some outdated aristocracy that is hand in glove with
the
interests of big business. Onward toward democracy.
One language, one people, one nation.

Errol


Guess Who <Supe...@hec.unil.ch> wrote in article
<33491...@cisun2000.unil.ch>...

Mr Koos Schumann

unread,
Apr 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM4/11/97
to

Huge Cajones Remailer wrote:
sorry u mist the boat and take real good look at yoyr own society and
then you deside what is real democracy.

0 new messages