Who gains if posts are illegally cancelled on this newsgroup?
Rick Sherwood
> Who gains if posts are illegally cancelled on this newsgroup?
As usual ARS Bigots blame the
Chruch for everything they cant understand. Your posts were cancelled
by an internet hate group known as the CABAL, because they did not
follow the teachings of there sacred BI. The CABAL is a well-known hate
group that sympathizes with the ARSCC, and may even be affiliated with
them.
Woody
Curt West
"Rick Sherwood" <woodn...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:oVE3c.37093$lT6.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...
LOL! Stupid clam. There is no arscc! Or is there? :)
Truth Seeker
In August & September of 2003, multiple articles that I had
posted on Alt.Religion.Scientology were illegally cancelled. They were
articles that put the church of scientology in a negative light. Who
would have the most to lose by their being on the internet? Who would
have the most to gain by their being canceled?
Any person or organization that illegally cancels a person's
posts is suppressing that person's freedom of speech. In the United
States of America, suppressing somebody's freedom of speech is a
crime. The illegal cancellations emanated from the ISP "Mindspring",
which is in the USA, is part of the ISP "Earthlink". "Earthlink" is an
ISP that is heavily used by the church of scientology. A vast amount
of email addresses attached to over 21 Scientology Orgs are from
Earthlink. Here are a few of those email addresses as proof of that
connection:
1. New York: "cofsn...@earthlink.net"
2. Washington DC: "cof...@earthlink.net"
3. Atlanta: "cofsa...@earthlink.net"
4. Boston: "scientol...@earthlink.net"
5. Flagship Org in Clearwater: "flagser...@earthlink.net"
6. Columbus, Ohio: "cofsco...@earthlink.net"
7. Tampa, Florida: "cofsf...@earthlink.net"
8. Portland: "scientolo...@earthlink.net"
9. Chicago: "cofsil...@earthlink.net"
10. Phoenix: "cofsp...@earthlink.net"
11. Los Angeles Org: "hollywood...@earthlink.net"
12. Advanced Organization of Los Angeles: "ao...@earthlink.net"
13. American Saint Hill Organization: "as...@earthlink.net"
14. Church of Scientology of the Valley, Van Nuys:
"cofsv...@earthlink.net"
15. Santa Barbara: "cofssant...@earthlink.net"
16. Orange County, CA : "cofsoran...@earthlink.net"
17. Church of Scientology Celebrity Centre International:
ccinter...@earthlink.net"
18. Albuquerque, NM: "cofsalb...@earthlink.net"
19. Ann Arbor: "cofsbat...@earthlink.net"
20. Dallas: "cofscc...@earthlink.net"
21. Long Island: "cofslon...@earthlink.net"
Is it possible that the church of scientology could have members
working in Earthlink? Is it possible that some of the owners or
controlling management of Earthlink are scientologists? Is it also
possible that these same people could have been given orders by the
church of scientology to illegally cancel my posts?
Any organization that suppresses a person's freedom of speech is
a criminal organization. Could the reason why my posts put up after
September 2003 have not been cancelled be because I have shifted to a
more secure news server in Germany, a country that Scientology does
not have as much reach in? If I hadn't made that shift, you probably
wouldn't be reading this article also and wouldn't know the truth
about what has happened to me. Who would have the most to gain if this
article was illegally canceled also?
Truth Seeker
++++++++++
"The first battle a warrior must win is the battle for his own mind"
Here is a list of the titles of all the articles posted earlier to
this newsgroup that the Church of Scientology does not want you to read.
If you're having a hard time finding them, just do a search on the title
of the article within this newsgroup with your newsreader or go to
google.com, select "groups" and enter the title of the article. Make sure
that if you do a search on a title to leave out the quotation marks:
*- "7 good reasons why you should stay away from Scientology"
*- "The FAQ for Alt.Religion.Scientology"
*- "When does a Scientologist cease to be a Scientologist?"
*- "Never reveal your true identity on this newsgroup!"
*- "The injustice that was leveled against me by the Church of Scientology"
*- "Names the Church of Scientology is posting under on this newsgroup"
*- "The Real Source of Happiness"
*- "Understanding how Scientology is going about discrediting their enemies"
*- "Want to know a good way to spot the undercover scientologists on this newsgroup?"
*- "The Church of Scientology creates their own enemies"
*- "The Church of Scientology is a mind control organization"
*- "The Church of Scientology is like a shadow"
*- "The Church of Scientology's Decoy System"
*- "Be careful of somebody trying to get you to put your name on a petition!"
*- "Arnie Lerma answers this important question"
*- "How Scientology is playing both sides of the coin"
*- "How Scientology wants the reader to Misidentify things on this newsgroup"
*- "How the Church of Scientology tries to discredit it's critics"
*- "How to know if you have been manipulated by OSA on this newsgroup"
*- "How to spot the OSA members on this newsgroup"
*- "This is how to destroy the Church of Scientology"
*- "Another trick Scientologists who are pretending to be critics use on this newsgroup"
*- "A red flag that something isn't right with the Church of Scientology"
*- "How Scientology Creates Identity Confusion"
*- "Don't ever send your mail to other people on this newsgroup!"
*- "Giving Scientology a taste of its own medicine"
*- "OSA's tactics in a nutshell"
*- "The effect The Church of Scientology is aiming for with those "Xenu" web sites"
*- "The key to how The Church of Scientology is trying to handle this newsgroup"
*- "The Magical Transformation of Church Member into Critic"
*- "The one thing the Church of Scientology won't help you go "free" from"
*- "The subject of CONTROL and the Church of Scientology"
*- "The truth about the book "Introduction to Scientology Ethics""
*- "There are two justice systems in Scientology"
*- "Be careful logging on to Scientology related web sites!"
*- "Church of Scientology's Solution to Stopping Real Critics & Criticism of their church"
*- "Conclusions the Church of Scientology want you to come to"
*- "Here's the real reason the OSA trolls want you to go on those "xenu" web sites"
*- "Is the Church of Scientology really helping you get somewhere?"
*- "Some ways to "handle" the Church of Scientology"
*- "Tactics OSA uses to stop critics on this newsgroup"
*- "The discrepancies between what's in Scientology's books and how things are in reality"
*- "What a undercover OSA agent Will & Will Not do"
*- "Want to know if you have been manipulated by Scientology?"
*- "What a Scientology Staff member sees when they look at you"
*- "What does the Church of Scientology have against free speech?"
*- "What to do so OSA can't hurt you on this newsgroup"
*- "Another Inconsistency in Tory's story"
*- "Tory's real mission on this newsgroup"
If any of the articles listed in this index cannot be found, it is probably because the
Church of Scientology has illegally canceled it in order to keep anybody from reading it.
Please wait for me to re-post it in the future.
Thank You.
Rick Sherwood
As usual, ARS Bigots continue to
blame the Chruch and ignore true data. The CABAL is cancelling your
posts because you do not abide by their BI Dictum. Honor the CABAL and
its rules and they will stop.
Woody
Rick Sherwood
> "Truth Seeker" <doubledr...@yohoo.com> wrote in message
> news:404f9b8f...@news.individual.net...
> ...another duplicate message.
>
> Watch carefully folks, this trained monkey will repost the same drivel
> AGAIN.
As usual ARS Bigots resort
to ridicule instead of solving the problem. If ARS Bigots could
EVLAUATE DATA they would know that Truth Seeker has crossed the CABAL
with his excessive multiposts. If ARS Bigots could EVALAUTE DATA they
would explain this so that he would stop. Instead they encourage him to
continue with the same behavior, knowing that he will falsely accuse the
Chruch of illegally cancelling his posts. Does anyone need any more
proof that ARS bigots only seek to distort and destroy?
Woody
Curt West
Let me help you out here Woodrow.
"Rick Sherwood" <woodn...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b9O3c.38110$lT6.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...
> As usual ARS Bigots resort
> to ridicule instead of solving the problem. If ARS Bigots could
> EVALUATE DATA they would know that Truth Seeker has crossed the CABAL
> with his excessive multiposts. If ARS Bigots could EVALUATE DATA they
> would explain this so that he would stop. Instead they encourage him to
> continue with the same behavior, knowing that he will falsely accuse the
> Church of illegally canceling his posts. Does anyone need any more
> proof that ARS bigots only seek to distort and destroy?
> Woody
Try spell checking your posts, troll.
Rick Sherwood
As usual ARS Bigots try to suppress freedom
of speech when they dont like the truth. ARS bigots think they can stop
Chruch Members from thinking for themselves but they cant. The Tech
takes care of that.
Woody
Curt West
> Curt West wrote:
>
> > Let me help you out here Woodrow.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> As usual ARS Bigots try to suppress freedom
> of speech when they don't like the truth. ARS bigots think they can stop
> Church Members from thinking for themselves but they cant. The Tech
> takes care of that.
> Woody
Here it is again, troll. I've spell checked your post again. Sheesh! If
you're such an all powerful being, please use your "sooper powerz" to hit
the spell check button.
Truth Seeker
Rick Sherwood
> How Scientology is similar to other false sources of happiness:
When will ARS bigots face
the facts about the Chruch? It is the world's fastest growing religion
and it always will be. ARS Bigots lies and distortion will never change
that.
Woody
Rick Sherwood
> How Scientology is similar to other false sources of happiness:
How are ARS Bigots similar to
other bigots? In lots of ways.
Woody
Nico Kadel-Garcia
"Curt West" <entwi...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:meJ3c.32451$PY.1...@newssvr26.news.prodigy.com...
Especially considering that there are primarily two kinds of cancellation
messages found on the $cientology newsgroups.
1: Spam cancellations for bulk stuff submitted to over 15 groups at the same
time. (The actual rule is a bit more complicated, but 15 is the "Briedbart
Index" for the stuff. Feel free to check it out.) This is a necessary rule
to prevent spammers from saturating all the newsgroups.
2: $cientology sponsored and forged cancellations of any material containing
significant amounts of their inner secrets. A lot of the history of this is
over an www.xenu.net, but the cult's cancellation of messages documenting
their inner secrets was first done officially by their attorney Helena
Kobrin (doubtless with some technical help).
A lot of the anti-$cientology people on the newsgroups got into it years ago
*because* of the cult's mishandling and abuse of newsgroups. The wild
spewing of over 3000 posts a night onto alt.religion.scientology by Jim Rego
and his assistants out in California, tying up 3 long-distance lines for 12
hours a night, led to California and other ISP's changing their policies
about accepting cash or money orders for new accounts because the
misbehavior then could not easily be traced to a real address. (An ISP
finally leaked Jim Rego's phone number from their dial-up logs, he was
identified, and the entire campaign stopped dead iin its track.)
The forged cancellations of other people's posts are what caused the
"NNTP-Posting-Host:" header to be added to every major NNTP server,
especially at netcom.com which faced a Usenet Death Penalty (having all
their posts dropped on the floor by other major ISP's) for allowing the
abuse to go on for so long. The history of message cancellation by the cult
aginst Dennis Erlich, Grady Ward, and dozens of other critics is a matter of
court record in the FACTnet lawsuits and the Dennis Erlich copyright
lawsuits.
Folks? This is either another $cientologist trying to "get their stats up"
for their weekly performance review by taking on the role of "Rick Sherwood"
and posting as a $cientologist, or it's a particularly dumb troll. Either
way, there's little to no factual content in the posts. The purpose of them
is to flood the newsgroups with confusing spew, not to enlighten anyone.
If you respond to them, actually include some interesting content. Make your
posts count for something.
Nico Kadel-Garcia
> Who gains if posts are illegally cancelled on this newsgroup?
>
>
> In August & September of 2003, multiple articles that I had
> posted on Alt.Religion.Scientology were illegally cancelled. They were
> articles that put the church of scientology in a negative light. Who
> would have the most to lose by their being on the internet? Who would
> have the most to gain by their being canceled?
>
> Any person or organization that illegally cancels a person's
> posts is suppressing that person's freedom of speech. In the United
> States of America, suppressing somebody's freedom of speech is a
> crime. The illegal cancellations emanated from the ISP "Mindspring",
> which is in the USA, is part of the ISP "Earthlink". "Earthlink" is an
> ISP that is heavily used by the church of scientology. A vast amount
> of email addresses attached to over 21 Scientology Orgs are from
> Earthlink. Here are a few of those email addresses as proof of that
> connection:
[ Earthlink email addresses deleted. ]
Umm. This is not proof of funding sources. Lots of business get AOL. Netcom,
UUnet, or Earthlink accounts because they're some of the biggest providers
and it's convenient to have a dialup line wherever you go for your company.
Small ISP's can't offer that, and most of those have gone out of business
anyway.
Much more compelling for Earthlink is their president Sky Dayton's
graduation from the $cientology "Delphi Academy", their former and possibly
present chief sys-admin Brian Wanger's threatening of former $cientology
members with confidential materials from their confessional material (which
are *NEVER* confidential: they are always sent back to the main office and
often reviewed by OSA staff for internal performance and security reasons).
As Earthlink has grown, the staff I've met from there at trade shows say
they've moved away from the "Hubbard Tech" management style they had in the
early days, especially as they took over other ISP's.
Good for them as a company, and we haven't seen the $cientology cancellation
message campaigns from there, perhaps because $cientology doesn't *pay* for
Earthlink. Earthlink pays *them* through contributions and $cientology
training by its senior staff. But I'd still consider personal email sent
through them to be vulnerable to monitoring by key staff members.
> Is it possible that the church of scientology could have members
> working in Earthlink? Is it possible that some of the owners or
> controlling management of Earthlink are scientologists? Is it also
> possible that these same people could have been given orders by the
> church of scientology to illegally cancel my posts?
Is it absolutely know? Of course it is! They had a VP $cientologist member
get busted for running a pyramid scheme. But frankly, they don't need to use
that. It's much safer, and easier, to pick up cheap or throwaway accounts
scattered around the country and use those instead. Usenet cancellation
messages are *trivial* to create. There's absolutely no reason to, and many
reasons not to, focus their efforts through Earthlink.
> Any organization that suppresses a person's freedom of speech is
> a criminal organization. Could the reason why my posts put up after
> September 2003 have not been cancelled be because I have shifted to a
> more secure news server in Germany, a country that Scientology does
> not have as much reach in? If I hadn't made that shift, you probably
> wouldn't be reading this article also and wouldn't know the truth
> about what has happened to me. Who would have the most to gain if this
> article was illegally canceled also?
I'm afraid you're making a clear technical mistake here. Cancellation
messages do not have to be sent from the systems on which a message was
composed: they can be forged from anywhere. And if it were worth a few Euros
to the $cientologists to do the cancellations from an ISP in Germany, I'm
sure they would. What may help there is the Germans are *Germans*. They're
notorious for keeping good paperwork, and probably use much better
procedures for verifying the real address of ISP clients. This helps make
such abuses easier to track back to their source.
But believe me, friend, with all the root-kitted Windows machines being used
for spam and distributed-denial-of-service attacks, any vaguely competent
cracker could simply use another German machine at the same ISP to forge the
cancellations without their message.
> Here is a list of the titles of all the articles posted earlier to
> this newsgroup that the Church of Scientology does not want you to read.
> If you're having a hard time finding them, just do a search on the title
> of the article within this newsgroup with your newsreader or go to
> google.com, select "groups" and enter the title of the article. Make sure
> that if you do a search on a title to leave out the quotation marks:
[ Titles snipped for brefity. ]
Now, this part is vaguely useful. Much better than off-the-mark or
unprovable allegations.
> If any of the articles listed in this index cannot be found, it is
probably because the
> Church of Scientology has illegally canceled it in order to keep anybody
from reading it.
> Please wait for me to re-post it in the future.
>
>
> Thank You.
Don't repost them too often! You want them to be available for newbies, but
not so frequent as to bore people with duplicates or so frequent as to be
classified as spam. (The threshold is the "Briedbart Index", "the sum of the
square roots of the number of crossposted groups for substantially posts
shall not exceed 15 in a 45-day period".) That leaves enough slack to be
able to post a once-a-week FAQ in a small number of groups, crossposted for
saving bandwidth, or a once-a-month FAQ for a larger number of relevant
groups.