Yes Aldo, He has a group called Out of Poverty on Facebook where I tried to create a discussion last year. Didn't get anything from him but met a Harvard guy running something called Openworld. The idea of making customers of poor people is more generally associated by the disciples of CK Prahalad I think, whereas Yunus takes the line that business shouldn't profit from poor people. Jeff --- On Tue, 27/1/09, ISF (Computer Scientists without Frontiers, Italy) <ceccare...@gmail.com> wrote: |
I'm no expert in this area Aldo and I'm discovering more as I look into it. The Grameen model of microcredit has no collateral, depending on trust between borrowers who must demonstrate a viable business model. This is the creation of Yunus. In later years, other began to think of ways to generate investment to seed microcredit. FINCA began in the mid-80s for example, Acumen another philanthropy based approach a little later. "Acumen Fund was incorporated on April 1, 2001, with seed capital from the Rockefeller Foundation, Cisco Systems Foundation and three individual philanthropists. Since then our network of investors and advisors has grown to include a wide range of individuals and organizations who share our belief in using entrepreneurial approaches to solve the problems of global poverty." Another approach was that conceived by Matt Flannery in KIVA, which leveraged direct public investment with no interest repaid. It now has several lookalikes. My colleague Terry made his pitch for a business driven approach in 1996 and sourced the Tomsk initiative in Russia with his own $4000 investment in 1999. In total it leveraged 10 million dollars from USAID which was deployed by FINCA and a slightly modified version of the Grameen model to create 10,000 new businesses in one city http://www.p-ced.com/projects/russia/ As I've learned more recently Oxfam followed behind in Russia in 2003 and in approximately the same timescale managed to seed 4,000 new businesses from public donations.. http://www.oxfam.org.uk/resources/countries/russia.html An interesting point perhaps is that in the UK, charities are not permitted to lobby politicians and making the case for investment in Russia involved putting the case to US goverment, this is something Oxfam would not have been able to do, even if they wanted to. I'm sure there are many mechanisms for leveraging investment in microcredit, those are just the ones I know about. Jeff --- On Wed, 28/1/09, Aldo Ceccarelli <ceccare...@gmail.com> wrote: |