LMI feasible whatever the T parameter??

25 views
Skip to first unread message

elmajidi azeddine

unread,
May 13, 2020, 7:16:01 PM5/13/20
to YALMIP
Hello Professor,

In order to get familiar with delayed nonlinear, i picked up a delayed LTI system example cited in various paper, in which it is said that the latter system is stable till a given value of T (best case T=4.472), however whatever the value i give to T, it got me always feasible!!!, in addition when i perform the simulation it is clear that system beyond T=5 got instable. I'm not sure what i did wrong in my LMIs.

Another question, if i get from the solver that the primal and the dual problem is feasible and in the same time i got a negative eigenvalue from one of my matrix variable (which should be definite positive), what should i understand?

Could you please help?

Thank you in advance.
Park99_Su2005.docx
Park99.m
DelayTestFuncHist.m
DelayTestFunc.m

Johan Löfberg

unread,
May 14, 2020, 1:46:28 AM5/14/20
to YALMIP
This

issymmetric(Pfeasible)

is a completely redundant check. It cannot be unsymmetric as it is structurally symmetric


Your model is not well posed as it is homogenuous, thus 0 is always feasible

>> assign(P,0);assign(Q,0);assign(X,0);assign(W,0);assign(Y,0);
>> check(Constraints)
 
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|   ID|          Constraint|   Primal residual|   Dual residual|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|   #1|   Matrix inequality|                 0|             NaN|
|   #2|   Matrix inequality|                 0|             NaN|
|   #3|   Matrix inequality|                 0|             NaN|
|   #4|   Matrix inequality|                 0|             NaN|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

some constraint must be intended to be a strict inequality. Using P >= I leads to infeasibility


Johan Löfberg

unread,
May 14, 2020, 1:47:33 AM5/14/20
to YALMIP
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages