Qari Abdul Basit

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Karri Pretty

unread,
Aug 3, 2024, 6:07:06 PM8/3/24
to xyamifuncfec

How can you just blindly accept? There's no evidence of it whatsoever. What makes it more dubious is that no name is given for abdul basits son and theres no evidence anywhere that he went to Hawza. Theres not even a statement by abdul basits son that he actually had this dream and became shia. no information whatsoever!

In your lecture, you said that Abdul Basits son converted to Shiaism and went to Hawza after he had a dream of his father, who was neither in heaven or hell because he recited the Quran alot. The proposed reason why abdul basit was stuck between heaven and hell is because he had not found the wilayat of Ali (as) in the Quran and so his son had to find it in order for abdul basit to go to heaven.

1. Can you kindly tell me where you retrieved this information from? Because there's no proof of it anywhere , not even on the Internet. Unfortunately, some people have accused you of giving out false and conjecture information on Youtube comments.

2. You have stated that Abdul Basit had a dream where he saw that his father was neither going to heaven or hell due to the fact that he read "so much Quran" ... But does this not contradict the Quran itself and traditions ? From what i know, you either go heaven or hell, you are not suspended between the two.

3. You also stated that Abdul Basits son went to the "Hawza" and "Studied" there ... Can you please tell me which hawza he went to and where? There should be an article of this somewhere since we are talking about the son of arguably the most famous Quran reciter ever.

Can you now understand my concern? No doubt, Ammar Nakshwani is very knowledgable scholar and i've benefited from him, but when i heard this i lost a bit of trust in him. But let's see if i get an answer, anyway, inshallah

In your lecture, you said that Abdul Basits son converted to Shiaism and went to Hawza after he had a dream of his father, who was neither in heaven or hell because he recited the Quran alot. The proposed reason why abdul basit was stuck between heaven and hell is because he had not found the wilayat of Ali (as) in the Quran and so his son had to find it in order for abdul basit to go to heaven.

1. Can you kindly tell me where you retrieved this information from? Because there's no proof of it anywhere , not even on the Internet. Unfortunately, some people have accused you of giving out false and conjecture information on Youtube comments.

2. You have stated that Abdul Basit had a dream where he saw that his father was neither going to heaven or hell due to the fact that he read "so much Quran" ... But does this not contradict the Quran itself and traditions ? From what i know, you either go heaven or hell, you are not suspended between the two.

3. You also stated that Abdul Basits son went to the "Hawza" and "Studied" there ... Can you please tell me which hawza he went to and where? There should be an article of this somewhere since we are talking about the son of arguably the most famous Quran reciter ever.

I would be extremely grateful if you could take the time to answer these queries yourself, Sayed, since this would clear up alot of accusations and confusion. I look forward to hearing your response.

Good job in pointing that out. I had watched the video and never taken notice. I still respect the guy, after all he's a good speaker. But yeah, we should be a little more cautious. As for him replying to your message, I highly doubt he would. I've sent him so much things but nothing, zilch :mellow: .. Let's hope he replies back to you.

Yeah, so you see, we have to be speculative when we hear stories like this from the pulpit, especially if they're odd and sound "alleged". Anyway, Ammar Nakshwani is a busy man so if you got zilch from him, then so am I. It's a bit heartbreaking that he says he'll "try" to answer all emails ... Yet, he doesn't.

If this information is false (I'm not suggesting it is because I don't know), then remember this was in his early lecturing days where he may not have been as disciplined with his sources as he is now. I don't think he would "lie" on purpose as you are making it out. As a speaker, you develop and get better over the years so it's unfair to bring up something in the past and use it as a black-mark on his character.

I wasn't suggesting that he was lying, at all. Rather, I'm saying that it looks like he heard of this tale word-of-mouth and decided it was authentic without any evidence attached to it and decides to speak about it on the pulpit. Sure, he may be more disciplined with his sources now, but then again how do you know?..

I wasn't suggesting that he was lying, at all. Rather, I'm saying that it looks like he heard of this tale word-of-mouth and decided it was authentic without any evidence attached to it and decides to speak about it on the pulpit.

If you don't like him and don't trust him, that's fine. But don't go making a thread defaming him for no reason. If he's made a mistake, why dwell on it when it's in the past, 6 years ago? Where's the forgiveness? Do you think it's fair to judge a person early in his career when he's less experienced?

If you were a noble person, you would have not made a thread about him and made a thread about the Qari's son instead, so that the topic is about him and we can discuss whether he converted or not. This would have been better than making a thread trying to make Sayed Ammar look bad.

Sister I have actually heard that story being told from the pulpit by people who are more "senior" than Sayid Ammar. Allah knows best where he got that information from but back then it could have been from other more learned people. Now I am not saying that the story is authentic but what I am saying is that this happens quite a bit. Someone hears a more learned person say something and then goes on to say it themselves. Sometimes there is a need to verify what has been said by people who are more learned than us.

Take this as an example: "The opinion of the Imam was unanimously approved and for the first time an Islamic coin was minted. Some of these coins were exhibited at the British Museum in 1988 at the event of the Islamic Art exhibition in London and a note shown that these coins were minted at the time of Walid Ibn Abdul Malik on the advice of the 5th Imam of Ahlulbayt." -islam.org/kaaba14/8.htm

c80f0f1006
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages