------
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-request@listproc.autodesk.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
MPC and PSYOP output some great work with Fabric Engine but in the end I always felt it was too narrowly aimed at senior TD's with plenty of programming experience. The success of ICE was fuelled by the compounds that acted as a gateway drug to the inner workings. I thought maybe that Kraken would develop into that gateway drug, but after seeing experienced riggers feeling out of their comfort zone, soon realised it wasn't to be.
When Eric Mootz joined the team I thought maybe that would bring about tools for technically minded artists who weren't necessarily TD's.
Whatever the reasons I feel for the FE team after all their hard efforts. But I feel as one door closes others will open for them, folk with that much talent don't remain jobless for long.
------ Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
I agree with everything you said..
And I'm also saddened to see fabric close-up it's doors, especially in this already diversity deprived environment.
& all the best to the FE team!
On 10/27/17 17:59, Jonathan Moore wrote:
MPC and PSYOP output some great work with Fabric Engine but in the end I always felt it was too narrowly aimed at senior TD's with plenty of programming experience. The success of ICE was fuelled by the compounds that acted as a gateway drug to the inner workings. I thought maybe that Kraken would develop into that gateway drug, but after seeing experienced riggers feeling out of their comfort zone, soon realised it wasn't to be.
When Eric Mootz joined the team I thought maybe that would bring about tools for technically minded artists who weren't necessarily TD's.
Whatever the reasons I feel for the FE team after all their hard efforts. But I feel as one door closes others will open for them, folk with that much talent don't remain jobless for long.
On 10/28/17 5:19, Michael Amasio wrote:
That's too bad.This is rough market. There's not much money in developing better solutions. I guess we'll ride out our DCC's with ancient architecture, and wait till one of us becomes a billionaire and funds something cutting edge.I'd love to here more of the story of what happened from some of the developers.
Guess I'll finally follow you to Houdini, Oliver.
On Oct 28, 2017 12:31 AM, "Olivier Jeannel" <facial...@gmail.com> wrote:
------
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
------ Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-request@listproc.autodesk.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
------
Softimage Mailing List.
I agree with everything you said..
And I'm also saddened to see fabric close-up it's doors, especially in this already diversity deprived environment.
& all the best to the FE team!
On 10/27/17 17:59, Jonathan Moore wrote:
MPC and PSYOP output some great work with Fabric Engine but in the end I always felt it was too narrowly aimed at senior TD's with plenty of programming experience. The success of ICE was fuelled by the compounds that acted as a gateway drug to the inner workings. I thought maybe that Kraken would develop into that gateway drug, but after seeing experienced riggers feeling out of their comfort zone, soon realised it wasn't to be.
When Eric Mootz joined the team I thought maybe that would bring about tools for technically minded artists who weren't necessarily TD's.
Whatever the reasons I feel for the FE team after all their hard efforts. But I feel as one door closes others will open for them, folk with that much talent don't remain jobless for long.
On 10/28/17 5:19, Michael Amasio wrote:
That's too bad.This is rough market. There's not much money in developing better solutions. I guess we'll ride out our DCC's with ancient architecture, and wait till one of us becomes a billionaire and funds something cutting edge.I'd love to here more of the story of what happened from some of the developers.
Guess I'll finally follow you to Houdini, Oliver.
On Oct 28, 2017 12:31 AM, "Olivier Jeannel" <facial...@gmail.com> wrote:
------
Softimage Mailing List.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
------ Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimag...@listproc.autodesk.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-request@listproc.autodesk.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
Hey list, having used Fabric Engine intensively for the last few years I thought it would be nice to share a few words about what it was and the void it leaves as it is no longer developed.
Here is the link for that post: http://gustavoeb.com.br/whatwasfabric
From: softimage-bounces@listproc.autodesk.com <softimage-bounces@listproc.autodesk.com> on behalf of Gustavo Eggert Boehs <gust...@gmail.com>
I’m sure he did. I wonder if MPC bought the rights to the Fabric Engine too haha, it just makes sense that something for data flow and technical development between software would be assimulated as in house tech within a huge production house over keeping it free/available for competition.
-Draise
From: Jonathan Moore
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 10:49
To: Official Softimage Users Mailing List. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/xsi_list
Subject: Re: Fabric engine is gone
I wonder if Paul brought more than his executive rucksack with him on his first day at the office? ;)
On 23 January 2018 at 15:36, gareth bell <garet...@outlook.com> wrote:
Co-founder of Fabric Software brings more than two decades of experience to new job.