Google Page Created: "XRMS 2.0 Action Plan"

[Ivaylo Boiadjiev]

Hi, Everyone!

Sorry for the delay in doing this but I have not had any time to even
read my emails for the last two days. To avoid emailing this document
to everyone over and over again, I have now posted it to the xrms-
users group and have updated it, as best as I could, with all the
constructive points that have been brought up.

Click on http://groups.google.ca/group/xrms-users/web/xrms-2-0-action-plan
- or copy & paste it into your browser's address bar if that doesn't
work.

The page is viewable and editable by any of the members of the xrms-
users group. Feel free to improve it in any way you see fit.

It also appears that at least some of the XRMS team do not appreciate
my initiative in putting this document together so I will cease my
work on it unless the consensus is that I should resume my
participation.

Thank you all and I hope it is of some use to you.

Cheers,
Ivaylo

[Walter Torres]

> It also appears that at least some of the XRMS team do not appreciate
> my initiative in putting this document together so I will cease my
> work on it unless the consensus is that I should resume my
> participation.

I think it will be of use to all of us.

I think your work, your thoughts, your ideas will be of great value,
now and in future.

I, for one, do "appreciate" your effort in putting this together.

The only thing I had issue with was announcing to the community at
large a plan and a time line that has not been discussed, or at least
not discussed much.

I didn't think I implied that what you were doing was wrong or not the
way to go. Well, yes, I did imply that he direction was a bit off.

We need to have a plan of incremental steps. Small successes to build upon.

Announcing a stable release in 3 weeks is not an incremental step. It
is a big undertaking that will involve several individuals, none the
least is a developer or 3 and then we have to figure out how to do a
release on Sourceforge.

So, the upshot, the ideas are nice, the time line needs to be scaled
back, and the implications of moving needs to be discussed.

Either way, thanks for the working document.

Walter