Forgot to reply-all. :)
I think that's the only thing missing that's needed for a windows build. And that's just MSVC builds that need it. With msys you should be able to do `make install` and then run it from the command line.
There are other issues with the postscript interpretation we're still working on. And image quality.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "xpost-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to xpost-discuss+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/xpost-discuss.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/xpost-discuss/1dfad44c-e3c6-4c87-baa3-14ada4aea94a%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Forgot to reply-all. :)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "luserdroog ." <luser...@gmail.com>
Date: Dec 1, 2016 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [xpost-discuss] Windows build
To: "L Michaels" <lme...@gmail.com>
Cc:I think that's the only thing missing that's needed for a windows build. And that's just MSVC builds that need it. With msys you should be able to do `make install` and then run it from the command line.
Thanks for the information on building for Windows.
Vincent Torri wrote:
>You need freetype and fontconfig, indeed. MSYS + MinGW is fine, though
>i would suggest MSYS2 + Win-Builds.
I do my own custom builds and have my own build system, utilites and scripts. I have a copy of the MinGW compiler (from the MinGW.org project), but I also have my own build of MinGW with POSIX threading enabled by default and other modifications. I also use several BSD utilities and am slowly trying to replace MSYS with Win32 native versions of utilities that don't rely on a Cygwin fork to run. My build of fontconfig includes some patches that let it run more like it does on Linux and Unix systems and doesn't require any registry settings. I run a lot of portable apps (portable as in cross-platform, but also portable as in easy to move from computer to computer via flash drive).
>I have begun to write a very simple viewer (look at xpost_view* in
>src/bin) but there is a little problem i can't fix for now (i just
>have a blank page...)
Will check it out. Thanks.
Was thinking a lightweight SDL based viewer might be a nice, cross-platform portable option. Might try coding something once I get a better feel for the xpost software and how it works.
Saw a mention of SVG in a few of the xpost-discuss posts. May not be useful, but I thought I'd mention the nanosvg code ( https://github.com/memononen/nanosvg ). I've used it in a few projects that needed SVG support (like Tuxmath).
Hoping to find a cross-platform Postscript viewer that let's me view the output of programs like abcm2ps, lcal and pcal. So far, Xpost looks more portable and more lightweight than Ghostscript. The license differences sound like a nice plus too. Wish you good luck with the project and if I can help with testing or something, let me know.
Sincerely,
Laura
http://www.distasis.com/cpp
On Friday, December 2, 2016 at 7:21:54 AM UTC-6, L Michaels wrote:Thanks for the information on building for Windows.
Vincent Torri wrote:
>You need freetype and fontconfig, indeed. MSYS + MinGW is fine, though
>i would suggest MSYS2 + Win-Builds.
I do my own custom builds and have my own build system, utilites and scripts. I have a copy of the MinGW compiler (from the MinGW.org project), but I also have my own build of MinGW with POSIX threading enabled by default and other modifications. I also use several BSD utilities and am slowly trying to replace MSYS with Win32 native versions of utilities that don't rely on a Cygwin fork to run. My build of fontconfig includes some patches that let it run more like it does on Linux and Unix systems and doesn't require any registry settings. I run a lot of portable apps (portable as in cross-platform, but also portable as in easy to move from computer to computer via flash drive).I'd agree that MSYS2 is significantly more supported. When I looked last,MSYS does have all the bells and whistles now like a package manager,but MSYS2 has that + lots of packages already available.