* External Email - Caution * |
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
Unfortunately there’s no way to resolve the issue short of a code change or change in the project (i.e. have fewer experiments in the project). The
--
Rick Herrick
XNAT Architect/Developer
Computational Imaging Laboratory
Washington University School of Medicine
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/xnat_discussion/eeb1fb99-959b-42be-a954-2b9d63f25f0an%40googlegroups.com.
I did not mean to send that email that soon. My cat jumped on my wrist and I inadvertently hit the magic send key stroke 😊
Unfortunately, there’s no way to resolve the issue short of a code change or change in the project (i.e. have fewer experiments in the project). The method in which that’s happening really should be refactored anyway, because it does several operations more than necessary (e.g. repeatedly checking whether the user can access a particular XSI type within a project, when the answer is always the same for that XSI type and project combination). Even in cases where the code isn’t blowing up the database, it could run a lot more efficiently.
But that doesn’t help you right now. But like I said I have no ideas on how to work around this problem in the context of an existing XNAT deployment.
BTW, if you did mention it I can’t find it: what version of XNAT, PostgreSQL, etc., are you running?