I'd like to second that - it's a feature that would be really helpful, given that, as the DICOM standard evolves and new elements are added, it can be difficult to ensure that all fields potentially containing PHI are removed by the "blacklist" (ouch, we need a
better, more socially acceptable term!) approach.
However, there is a caveat to this. DICOM is a large and complex standard and it's possible to render data almost useless by failing to "add back in" all the fields that users "down the line" might need via the "whitelist" approach. A possible solution to this might be a rigorous implementation of the DICOM Part 15 Basic Confidentiality Profile
https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/html/part15.html#chapter_E, followed by adding back in your specific tags. But, as per the first paragraph, it's a hassle keeping the Basic Profile up to date.