Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

highest SpamAssassin score?

116 views
Skip to first unread message

Jim Janney

unread,
Nov 5, 2013, 4:05:37 PM11/5/13
to
I was looking at my spam file today and happened to notice this beauty:

X-Spam-Level: **************************************************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=74.7 required=8.0 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_3_NEW,
ADVANCE_FEE_4_NEW,ADVANCE_FEE_5_NEW,AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2,BAYES_80,
DCC_CHECK,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FROM_MISSPACED,FROM_MISSP_EH_MATCH,
FROM_MISSP_MSFT,FROM_MISSP_REPLYTO,FSL_CTYPE_WIN1251,FSL_MISSP_REPLYTO,
MISSING_HEADERS,NSL_RCVD_HELO_USER,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_PSBL,
REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP,TO_NO_BRKTS_MSFT,
TR_Caps_n_Bayes_80,TR_Mismatch_TLD_01,TR_Orig_Subnet,TR_Sbj_FN_Bdy,
UNTRUSTED_Relay,XM_SPF_SoftFail,XM_XX_Yahoo autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2

Then I did a search on X-Spam-Status and found this one:

X-Spam-Level: **************************************************
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=108.2 required=8.0 tests=ADVANCE_FEE_2_NEW_MONEY,
ADVANCE_FEE_3_NEW,ADVANCE_FEE_3_NEW_MONEY,ADVANCE_FEE_4_NEW,
ADVANCE_FEE_4_NEW_MONEY,ADVANCE_FEE_5_NEW,ADVANCE_FEE_5_NEW_MONEY,
AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2,BAYES_99,BOTNET,BOTNET_NORDNS,DCC_CHECK,
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,FORM_FRAUD_3,
FORM_FRAUD_5,FROM_MISSPACED,FROM_MISSP_EH_MATCH,FROM_MISSP_MSFT,
FROM_MISSP_REPLYTO,FROM_MISSP_USER,FSL_CTYPE_WIN1251,FSL_MISSP_REPLYTO,
HTML_MESSAGE,JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_3,LOTS_OF_MONEY,MILLION_USD,MIME_HTML_ONLY,
MONEY_FORM_SHORT,MONEY_FRAUD_3,MONEY_FRAUD_5,MONEY_FROM_MISSP,MultiRelay_CC,
NSL_RCVD_FROM_USER,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PSBL,
RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RELAYCOUNTRY_BR,RELAYCOUNTRY_KR,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,
TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP,TO_NO_BRKTS_MSFT,TR_Caps_n_Bayes_99,TR_DCC_Bayes_99,
T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,UNTRUSTED_Relay,XMBody_17,
XMRcvdHeader_02,XMStrtUSub autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2

Anybody got a better one?

--
Jim Janney
0 new messages