Nah, dari definisi tersebut, kita bisa pahami bahwa Discussion Text adalah Sebuah teks yang berisi sebuah diskusi atau berdebatan (wacana) dalam skala besar sehingga menimbulkan Pro dan kontra pada masyarakat dan khalayak orang banyak.
Dalam pembahasan Discussion Text kali ini, Quipper Video akan mencoba menggunakan Bahasa Inggris juga agar kalian bisa latihan memahami materi ini dengan lebih fasih lagi. Yuk latihan lebih jauh lagi tentang Discussion Text melalui Contoh Soal SBMPTN dari materi ini yang ada di Quipper Video. Bagi kamu yang belum berlangganan, yuk deh berlangganan!
A discussion text consists of an issue and arguments for supporting and opposing sides. The issue is already stated, then we can confirm that the next sentence will discuss arguments about the issue, which are the pros and cons of smartphones.
As you have learned, discussion text tells information and opinion about an issue. The opinion consist of supporting and opposing argument.
The benefit of nuclear power plant for life is not a suitable topic for discussion text, because it only elaborates one perspective which is pros.
The use of nuclear power plant endangers human life is not a suitable topic for discussion text, because it also only elaborates one perspective which is cons.
How nuclear power plants produce clean and save energy is not a good topic, because it is topic for explanation text.
Many countries in Europe start using nuclear power plants. This sentence is suitable for news item text, not discussion.
The advantages and disadvantages of nuclear power plants is the most suitable topic for discussion text. It gives two argument that oppose each other (advantages and disadvantages).
The sentence state that marriage has a beneficial effect on men. Study and comprehend each argument to know what it supports. There are word such burden, dissatisfaction, unhappy, suffer, and depression indicate that the argument is opposing the main sentence. Thus, the most suitable supporting sentence is Compared to single men of the same age group, married men enjoy better physical and mental health.
One of language features of discussion text is the use of conjunction. A conjunction is a word that connect parts of the sentence. We can see the last sentence use conjunction not only. To complete the sentence into a good logic, the right phrase to fill the blank is but also.
Begitulah Quipperian! Soal-soal mengenai discussion text di atas adalah soal-soal yang diambil langsung dari Quipper Video, lho. Soal-soal tersebut juga soal-soal yang diambil oleh tim Quipper Video untuk persiapan SBMPTN di Paket Intensif SBMPTN 2018! Semakin seru kan jika menjawab soal dari Quipper Video ini? Yuk buruan berlangganan Quipper Video jika belum, ya! Kalau kalian masih penasaran seperti apa sih belajar online menggunakan Quipper Video itu, kalian bisa tonton video di bawah ini.
The document defines a discussion text and outlines its key components and language features. A discussion text presents differing viewpoints on an issue and aims to explore various opinions to enable an informed decision. It discusses both sides of an argument, weighing positives and negatives before making a conclusion. Key elements include an issue statement, arguments for and against with evidence, and a recommendation. Language features emphasize presenting multiple perspectives through language like comparative adjectives and words showing opinion. Examples of discussion texts on school uniforms and national exams are also provided.Read less
Countries reached agreement on the remaining issues of the so-called Paris rulebook, the operational details for the practical implementation of the Paris Agreement. Among them are the norms related to carbon markets, which will allow countries struggling to meet their emissions targets to purchase emissions reductions from other nations that have already exceeded their targets. Negotiations were also concluded on an Enhanced Transparency Framework, providing for common timeframes and agreed formats for countries to regularly report on progress, designed to build trust and confidence that all countries are contributing their share to the global effort.
137 countries took a landmark step forward by committing to halt and reverse forest loss and land degradation by 2030. The pledge is backed by $12bn in public and $7.2bn in private funding. In addition, CEOs from more than 30 financial institutions with over $8.7 trillion of global assets committed to eliminate investment in activities linked to deforestation.
103 countries, including 15 major emitters, signed up to the Global Methane Pledge, which aims to limit methane emissions by 30 per cent by 2030, compared to 2020 levels. Methane, one of the most potent greenhouse gases, is responsible for a third of current warming from human activities.
Over 30 countries, six major vehicle manufacturers and other actors, like cities, set out their determination for all new car and van sales to be zero-emission vehicles by 2040 globally and 2035 in leading markets, accelerating the decarbonization of road transport, which currently accounts for about 10 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions.
Private financial institutions and central banks announced moves to realign trillions of dollars towards achieving global net zero emissions. Among them is the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero, with over 450 firms across 45 countries that control $130 trillion in assets, requiring its member to set robust, science-based near-term targets.
Countries were still locked in negotiations as night descended on the last official day of COP26, with all indications pointing to a long night of working out a final agreement. Earlier in the day, parties met for over three hours to discuss draft texts for the agreement.
As parts of COP26 spent a day taking up climate and gender connections, negotiations on a final outcome agreement entered high gear. Ministers led discussions to narrow differences on key issues that will determine climate ambition going forward.
At the heart of COP26 is the urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, 80 per cent of which come from energy generation and use. A day dedicated to a future of clean energy saw multiple announcements of new initiatives, funds and pledges to reduce and end coal use, the dirtiest of the fossil fuels. The United Kingdom called for consigning coal to history. Since the Paris Agreement in 2015, the number of planned new coal plants globally has dropped by 76 per cent.
World leaders have left Glasgow. Attention at COP26 turned to the specifics of moving the climate action agenda, with a focus on how to finance the transition to a greener future. The issue of finance is all encompassing. There is much concern over the failure of developed countries to meet their promise to provide $100 billion a year to help developing countries finance climate mitigation and adaptation. At the same time, there is a broader effort to mobilize vast amounts of private investment globally behind low-carbon and eventually no-carbon growth.
The second day of the World Leaders Summit at COP26 had a decidedly different tone, with much of the focus moving from the vast plenary room, where speeches continued, to side events that announced new actions. Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan said his bank would mobilize $100 billion a year in climate financing. Ecuador said it was expanding the Galapagos marine nature preserve by 60,000 square miles. Major initiatives were launched to reduce methane and slow deforestation.
Discussion text adalah sebuah teks yang menyajikan suatu topik permasalahan yang kemudian didiskusikan dalam berbagai sudut pandang. Discussion text sendiri membahas suatu hal yang berisikan pandangan professional dan kontra terhadap suatu hal tersebut. Topik yang dibahas dalam discussion text sendiri biasanya adalah isu-isu kontroversial yang terjadi di masyarakat.
Tujuan Dari discussion text di antaranya memberikan informasi baru kepada pembaca terkait suatu isu. Informasi ini juga berupa sudut pandang baru, sehingga pembaca dapat melihat suatu isu dari sudut pandang berbeda. Masih banyak yang keliru dengan perbedaan Discussion Text dan Persuasive Text. Hal ini dikarenakan struktur keduanya sangat mirip.
Walau demikian, keduanya memiliki fungsi dan tujuan yang sangat berbeda. Pada persuasive text biasanya bersifat persuasif atau membujuk. Tujuannya adalah membujuk pembaca untuk setuju dengan opini penulis dan condong ke suatu pihak. Sementara discussion text biasanya bersifat logis dan objektif. Si penulis tak mengajak pembaca untuk condong ke salah satu pihak.
Tujuannya hanya memberikan informasi dari berbagai sudut pandang yang berbeda. Karena discussion text bersifat objektif, maka penulis tidak boleh berat sebelah dan harus senetral mungkin. Dalam pembuatan teks diskusi sendiri terdapat beberapa unsur kebahasaan. Berikut ini beberapa ciri dari discussion text yang perlu kamu ketahui:
Merasa berbahasa Inggris kalian masih minim? Atau sering merasa kesulitan dalam belajar bahasa Inggris? Padahal sudah belajar bahasa Inggris sejak SD, bahkan hingga di Perguruan Tinggi. Buku berjudul 100 Language Functions for Fluent English dirancang bagi siapapun yang ingin meningkatkan dan mengembangkan keterampilan berbahasa Inggris secara aktif dalam komunikasi sehari-hari.
Dengan berisikan 100 ungkapan yang relate dalam percakapan sehari-hari, tentunya buku ini akan membantu kalian dalam melakukan komunikasi dengan teman ataupun keluarga menggunakan bahasa Inggris. Maka dari itu, yuk, beli!
Tujuan dari Discussion Text sendiri adalah mengetengahkan suatu masalah dari dua sudut pandang berbeda sebelum akhirnya sampai pada suatu kesimpulan atau rekomendasi dengan cara menyajikan sebuah isu atau informasi dengan memaparkan beberapa pendapat para pakar di bidangnya dan biasanya pendapat yang dipaparkan tersebut adalah pendapat yang saling bertentangan (pro dan kontra).
c80f0f1006