I could measure these up as a baseline if you were to get some
made....?
The info I have is for US springs that should lower the car about 1 inch in
the front and 1/2 inch in the rear.
The fronts are specified as 7 coils, 117.5lbs/inch, with a free height of 9
inches. By my calculations they should then be 145mm under load of 200kg.
The rears are specified as 8 coils, 154lbs/inch, with a free height of 10
1/4 inch. They should then be 185mm under load of 235kg.
I'd be interested in how these stack up against yours. I've seen sets in the
UK for 150 pounds (about $350 at current rates) plus freight. US sets seem
to be about $290US ($400 NZ) plus freight.
Regards
PeteR
Fronts = 11.15mm diameter, 170mm(ish) compressed height, 4.5 coils
Rears = 11.75mm diameter, 175mm(ish) compressed height, 6 coils
These would not be captive in standard struts, both fronts and rears
have been modified with 128 strut top nuts and shortened shocks.
It sits just about perfectly, the only complaint I have is the rears
are a wee bit soft - the last track day Ewan Mitchell said it felt a
bit softer than his one. Still goes around corners pretty well
though....
There is no rub with the standard rims and 175/70 tyres, but I think
it would rub with bigger rubber.
Thanks
Dylan
It looks like your rears are possibly 25mm lower than standard as under load
these should be 200mm. Your front length is pretty close to standard the
manual says 170mm. As far as I know my one is on standard springs and sits
170 at the front and about 190-195 at the rear.
Thanks for the extra info. I plan on visiting Chamberlains here in ChCh as
they make and export Cobra springs and see if they can make something (or
already have) that is close to the specs I have.
I just went out and measured ride height (ground clearance), as opposed to
spring length. At the front - ground to bottom of the control arm/radius arm
link (the flat area where the bolt goes through - not the nut or the end of
the bolt though, the actual arm) - mine measures 165mm. I checked both sides
and they are the same - so that's a bonus. The rear I measured from ground
to bottom of the control arm nearest the wheels - this was 145mm (again the
same on both sides :-) ). You'll need a flat and level garage floor to do
these measurements. These measurements are possibly more meaningful when
comparing cars - especially mark 1 and mark 2 - as the springs may have been
different but I don't think so.
As an aside the spec I have for rear springs says free length of 10 1/4 inch
(260mm) and a compression rate of 154lb/inch. The rear corner weights
according to Haynes are 562lb - this should compress the spring 3.65" (93mm)
to give a compressed spring length of 167mm (33mm less than standard).
So based on the spring specs I have the car would be dropped more at the
front than at the rear, which I guess is what we want. Shifting weight
forward could be expected to increase understeer but stiffer rear springs
would increase oversteer - so if the Yanks have done it right the overall
effect should be neutral!
If you can make the same measurements, I'd be interested to compare.
Pete
Sorry for the bum (dumb) steer.
Pete
> > > > > Christchurch- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Rear - at the jacking points = 170mm
Front - at the lowest point of the radius arm body mounting which is a
kind of fin thing = 165mm
Dylan
Mine has 175/70's which in theory are 575mm diameter, 185/60's are
552mm diameter, so 11.5mm lower....if it helps!
Also I have a tyre size calculator that I have uploaded to the docs
section, I have found it quite useful.
Dylan