Phoenix inspection module docs wording fix request

22 views
Skip to first unread message

"Boštjan Mejak"

unread,
May 22, 2013, 2:34:21 AM5/22/13
to wxpytho...@googlegroups.com
Please visit this link: http://wxpython.org/Phoenix/docs/html/lib.mixins.inspection.html#usage

There is a text "InspectableApp usage:" which is okay when the usage of the InspectableApp class is being explained, but then below that we have an explanation of the InspectionMixin class and the text "InspectableApp usage:" repeats.

Please fix the second occurence of the text "InspectableApp usage:" to "InspectionMixin usage:".

Boštjan Mejak

unread,
May 25, 2013, 10:55:56 AM5/25/13
to wxpytho...@googlegroups.com, mejak...@gmail.com
Anyone interested in fixing this?

werner

unread,
May 25, 2013, 12:51:41 PM5/25/13
to wxpytho...@googlegroups.com
On 25/05/2013 16:55, Bo�tjan Mejak wrote:
> Anyone interested in fixing this? --
One would need to know what you would like to fix?

Anyhow I think by now you know that a patch is the way to get things
done - and if it is for Phoenix then you should propose and discuss it
on the dev list and not on this one.

Have a nice weekend
Werner

Boštjan Mejak

unread,
May 25, 2013, 2:25:43 PM5/25/13
to wxpytho...@googlegroups.com
I would love to make a patch but I don't know where can I get the source code of those Phoenix docs... Do you know?

Robin Dunn

unread,
May 25, 2013, 4:50:12 PM5/25/13
to wxpytho...@googlegroups.com
Bo�tjan Mejak wrote:
> I would love to make a patch but I don't know where can I get the source
> code of those Phoenix docs... Do you know?
>

In the same place as the source code. They're called docstrings.

Oh, by the way, the fix has already been done in my git repository for a
few days now, it just hasn't been pushed to the subversion repository yet.

--
Robin Dunn
Software Craftsman
http://wxPython.org
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages