Hi Andrew,
I hope are enjoying a quiet December 25th and a well deserved break!
I apologize for not getting back to you sooner after our meeting. I really wanted to thank you for your time and clarity about our situation. FYI, below are the notes a I took during our conversation.
As you might imagine, the group is definitely interested in learning more
about the "adaptive reuse" option that we discussed at the meeting. We agree that this may be our most realistic path to cohousing. We would appreciate your getting us the list of NW Philly properties mentioned at the meeting, with addresses, sizes, basic specs and price points (real or estimated,) that we might be able to convert into cohousing. We will then look at these properties and get back to you. Do you think we could have this over the next week or two?
Meanwhile, we may have a few more questions about the possibilities of using 7048 Germantown, but I will let you know. I am curious what the status of the property is
these days and whether your planning for it has advanced at all as well.
Thanks very much & a very happy & healthy New Year to you and yours!
Abby
Meeting
with Andrew Eisenstein (Iron Stone), and WVC members:
Bob
Bernstein Janet Boys, Vanessa Lowe and Abby Weinberg
Thursday,
December 13, 2012; 2:15 – 3:35 pm
Andrew explained that the economics of condominiums is
different from building houses or apartments. He insisted that it is uniquely
difficult to finance the building of condos in Pennsylvania at this time
because bank regulators won’t allow banks to lend to condo builders. Currently,
only rental apartment buildings and single-family homes are being financed, and
therefore built, not condos.
The only thing Andrew thinks it makes sense to build on 7048
Germantown are
“Fee
Simple” residences, which would mean townhouses or possibly duplexes where
the top and bottom are owned by the same person.
When asked “what is we significantly simplify the design?”
his response was:
- Be
careful not to design something you don’t want to live in.
- If you
are wiling to live in a simple apartment building, the most economically
feasible idea is to buy an existing apt building and fix it up to your
standards.
Renovation vs. New Construction
We spoke a lot about the implications of deciding to locate
WVC in an already existing building in Northwest Philadelphia:
- Andrew felt that we were very likely to find a
suitable apartment building or warehouse to buy in our geographically
preferred area. (Approx ½ mile from Weavers Way Coop.)
- He explained that once we were to purchase an
apartment building and had enough renters who wanted to buy, we could turn
the apartments into condos in stages. Although it is impossible to
get financing to build a new condo, it seems it is not a problem to turn
and an existing apt building into a condo. (Bob agrees this is true.)
- Andrew owns several building we may be able to do
this with and knows of many others in Mt. Airy. He will give us a
list with addresses, basic specs, and anything he can tell us about
general pricing.
- Andrew believes that any building can get an elevator
put in and most any other feature we want.
- Things
we may
give up if working with an existing building:
- Access
to parking (most buildings in Mt. Airy do not have lots.)
- Some
sustainability features (although it is as important to think about
retrofitting for sustainability as it is to think about it for new
constriction)
- Green
outdoor space for community gathering
- Etc.
- The main benefits are: sustainable reuse of buildings
and MUCH less expensive!
Moving Forward
1. Show
him the money: In order to become partners with Iron Stone, in addition to
drafting and signing an agreement, we will need to put money into our LLC so
that it is a real organization that can be a partner. This will likely
come out to putting $500,000-600,000 in escrow to ensure that we don’t walk
away from the project.
2. Andrew
pointed out that we still need to clarify some of our values especially as they
relate to the build environment. Hs saw several conflicting impulses in
our group that will need to be prioritized in order to find a property that
works. The values are:
a. Sustainability
b. Affordability
c. Geography
(location in W. Mt. Airy)
d. Need
for Financing
e. Cohouing
principles (Parking away from homes, common house, etc)
f. Green
open space
Conflicts include:
a. Sustainability
(passive house) vs. geography: Homes in Mt Airy can’t really be oriented to
maximize solar exposure because the lots do not line up correctly, therefore
that feature of Passive Haus may not be an option
b. Cohousing
principles vs. Geography: It will be hard to find a building in Mt. Airy that
has parking in one spot…
3. We agreed
that the best way to proceed is to get a list of local apartment buildings from
Andrew and go visit them. This way we can see what we like & don’t
like and whether we could imagine creating and living cohousing in one of these
buildings. We will see first hand what is it we would be giving up and
what we would gain from turning various buildings into cohousing. (Abby
will get the list from Andrew next week.)