Re: [wst-list] Literal encoding, SOAP body and other questions

[Inoussa OUEDRAOGO]

Hi,

> In the documentation, it was always litteral instead of literal as the
> coding style. In wiki fixed

For SOAP related matters please take a look at the unit
base_soap_formatter.pas :
TSOAPEncodingStyle and TSOAPDocumentStyle are defined there.

> Now the question is without much hope of a response :).

Wrong :-)

> 1. How can I access the request SOAP body (*client side*) before sending it

See client_filters.pas for an actual sample; The unit filter_intf.pas
is the base for this.
For an usage, see [1].

> 2. Project abandoned?

No, absolutely NO!

WST is used every in production and in new projects.

I am since a moment in a long running mission out of my usual working place ...

[1] https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer#!topic/wst-list/LZw3GdRmkf4

Best regards.

--
Inoussa O.

[Ренат Сулейманов]

Hi. Thank you very much. I am glad!

суббота, 16 июня 2018 г., 5:37:16 UTC+4 пользователь Inoussa OUEDRAOGO написал:

Hi,

> In the documentation, it was always litteral instead of literal as the
> coding style. In wiki fixed

For SOAP related matters please take a look at the unit
base_soap_formatter.pas :
TSOAPEncodingStyle and TSOAPDocumentStyle are defined there.

I mean, there was an error in the WST help. I have already fixed in wiki

> Now the question is without much hope of a response :).

Wrong :-)

:)

> 1. How can I access the request SOAP body (*client side*) before sending it

See client_filters.pas for an actual sample; The unit filter_intf.pas
is the base for this.
For an usage, see [1].

Thank you!

> 2. Project abandoned?

No, absolutely NO!

WST is used every in production and in new projects.

It's cool!

I am since a moment in a long running mission out of my usual working place ...  

I'm understand