Autocad Error Code 58000
Pirjo
I can't find a reference for the error code numbers anywhere. Is there a way to increase the error message verbosity? Previous versions of AutoCAD generated descriptive error messages, not just error code numbers. Fixing modelling errors with a descriptive guide to the problem is only achievable through trial and error...
I too wish I had access to a definitive list of what the error codes identify. Apparently they are only helpful to the Dev team. Do you have a model you want me to take a look at to see if I can figure out what might be failing?
I've centred the view on the lofting operation I'm trying to get working - there are two profiles - a 6-sided polygon and a 4-sided, long thin rectangle, joined by six polylines I'm trying to use as guides. Selecting any of the guides during the loft causes a modelling error.
I took a look at your model and found that if I zoomed in very tight, many of the lines did not connect at all. I rebuilt much of the geometry and then lofted parts together, ran SURFSCULPT and ended up with this 3D solid.
I've always trued to avoid generating/using surfaces - I tend to only encounter them when a 3d modelling operation (like loft or extrude) goes wrong - I'll certainly review their usefulness based on what you say.
I've always used AutoCAD out the box to model some pretty sophisticated as well as simple items. I've worked AutoCAD since 1989. I've never ever received so many modeling errors. below are just a few I captured and copied to a log, just today. I"ve provided the error and the command it failed in and the text therein.
Are you using 3D solid models created in prior versions in AutoCAD 2018? If so, my guess is that the updated ASM modeler that we introduced in AutoCAD 2018 is catching additional data errors that were previously overlooked (but will bite you later). Error messages are displayed for errors that the newest ASM can't fix.
anyway, I attempted to put a 1/2x45deg chamfer on the bottom outboard side of the part. first off, I drew half, did my extrusions and subtractions then mirrored it. then unioned it. cleaned it. checked it for "This object is a valid ShapeManager solid.".
1. if the mtext text box is used to change the text justification, the next time the drawing is opened, the text no longer has the justification chosen in the mtext editor. it doesn't stick. I have to change mtext justification in the Properties. always. Now given that the justification in the properties has 9 options and the mtext editor only 3 plus the spread, maybe I;'m missing something here.
Yes, I see the issue. When it tries to chamfer edges that run out to adjacent edges that have already been chamfered, the modeling engine gives up. When I do a Ctrl+Erase on the previously chamfered edges, I can chamfer a 2D loop as shown.
I just had the same error (the first in his list) doing a chamfer on a hardware block for a door hinge. Professionals pretty much all have large block libraries. Does Autodesk expect us to redraw them all in Autocad 2018? I'm sorry, but if it works in 2016 I expect it to not error out in 2018. Saying the new version found an error all previous versions missed is simply making excuses for incomplete development.
As a professional with a library of over a thousand 3D blocks all drawn in Autocad from 2006 up I consider these errors in 2018 are due to the failure of Autodesk's programming. Especially since they were drawn CORRECTLY in YOUR SOFTWARE! Autodesk should be giving us a date for the service pack that will error-trap what you inaccurately call "mistakes" in our Valid ShapeManager Solids. Pointing fingers at the customers shelling out thousands of dollars for your software is not a very intelligent response.
The issue was more likely due to a defect in the previous version of the ASM modeler. Upgrading to a newer version of ASM might have impacted models created with the earlier version. This possibility was enough of a concern when we made the update that we had customers test for issues during a Beta program before it was released.
If there's any way that you can post or email me (die...@companyname.com) a few sample models that exhibit this problem, I'd be happy to involve our engineering team to see whether the update was the case or whether the behavior is due to a different problem. Please note that Autodesk will be closed until January 2.
No offense taken Dieter. This isn't personal. It's business. Most of the blocks I'm using were made by others, many straight from vendors. I'm adding machine code to models based on the insertion points of 3D Solid models for various parts and hardware. I take existing solids and edit them to update or create new models. It's essential that the applied machining is confirmed by the solid model when the engineers import this hardware. I mainly get these errors trying to simply move, edit or delete faces. It makes a simple task a pain in the ass.
You don't need any help from me. Autodesk has more than enough resources, if it has the will, to simply do what I'm doing. Work through a large library of Valid ShapeManager Solids gathered over the last eight years or so and start editing them. You'll find some will generate those inscrutible errors. Find a solution to prevent them so your customers can work more efficiently.
As I said, Autodesk subjected the ASM upgrade to a Beta testing process. The only modeling errors we found came from a Beta customer who received solid models (actually, it turned out that they were 3D faces) from a source generated by a non-Autodesk application. I don't know whether this is the case in your situation and we've no way of verifying the issue without a sample block or two that fails. If there's an issue with AutoCAD, we'd like to fix it. If the issue is with a third party or some other reason, we won't be able to do so.
please advise status to this issue as I too have similar issues... we completed multiple projects for a specific customer using R2013 and they just came back to us wanting a 100% duplicate on a super rush project... We are now using R2018 in which every project file is now corrupt when opened and deletes 95% of the CAD model. This is supposed to be a file-save-as exercise with a find/replace text and build to print... as it stands now... this AutoCad/Autodesk deficiency will now cause us hundreds of hours of rework we did not budget nor have time for and will cause a schedule delay on a critical path project which happens to be a vaccine for this covid pandemic that we are all working through... what the heck happened between R2013 vs 2018 that says all previous project solids are junk?
Here is my version for a text and attribute editor. File vt.lsp must be renamed to vt.vlx because i cound't upload it otherwise. After that you should be able to load it with (load "vt.vlx") , at least , i think , never did a vlx before but the advantage is that you only need one file. Disadvantage , you can't read the code.
I made a vlx also because some parts of the code i made almost 20 years ago so it would be a bad example for y'all. So i have some rewriting to do first. Maybe I'll ask a certain quantum mechanic for his advice what parts of my code I'd better rewrite ;-) because it has some junk / abandoned code in it as well and the titleblock part is a big part and is only relevant for the company I work for at the moment so I'm thinking about removing it before posting the cleaned code.
In case anyone interested I can provide the titleblocks to play with the revision utilities. Just a matter of replacing the logo but attribute names would have to stay the same for VT to recognise them. Could of course write a more generic version but it wouldn't be of much use for myself.
As Lee Mac pointed out at me in my RlxIso thread , for distribution purposes less(files) is more so I sought a way to accomplish this and VLX seems to be a good way. I tried it at home and it worked. But , as 77077 pointed out , you have to rename vt.lsp to vt.vlx and load it with (load "vt.vlx")
As Lee Mac pointed out at me in my RlxIso thread , for distribution purposes less(files) is more so I sought a way to accomplish this and VLX seems to be a good way. I tried it at home and it worked. But , as 77077 remarkt , you have to rename vt.lsp to vt.vlx and load it with (load "vt.vlx")
Monday when im back at work (if sniffy , the drugs dog , lets me in haha) ill post the titleblocks. Last monday it sniffed me and i said , if you shut up youll get half ;-) , nah just kidding , don't do drugs.
Added are the titlebocks. If you have a blank drawing VT will insert one for you (can give an error but it stills insert one , bloody bugs) See page 16 from the second part of the manual. You get this dialog by pressing Revision in the QuickMenu.
I intend to , but not before I do some cleaning up because some parts are reaylly poorly coded and some parts are completely devoded for converting old GE-titleblocks to Sabic-titleblocks and those are totally useless for the rest of the world.
And another reason there still is so much 'vanilla' in VT is that untill recently it still had to work for autocad2000i and that is before the VL-lisp revolution. Correction , it was autocad 12 (not 2012) . But i decided to let go of that legacy. I'm still learning every day (vl-every day )
Are you trying to create 2D and 3D drawings using AutoCAD, but are you getting the error '58000'?AutoCAD is a computer-aided design (CAD) software application developed by Autodesk. It is used to create 3D CAD models and it is often used in the construction industry. The program has many different tools that can be used for modeling and it also includes advanced engineering features such as mechanical, electrical, civil and structural designs.This software can be used on both a personal computer and a workstation. The program can also be installed on the Apple Mac OS X operating system, Microsoft Windows and Linux. Autodesk offers several different types of licensing for AutoCAD depending on your needs. You can purchase either an annual subscription or you can purchase single-user licenses for use with individual users at home or in small offices.Tech Support 24/7Ask a Tech Specialist OnlineConnect with the Expert via email, text or phone. Include photos, documents, and more. Get step-by-step instructions from verified Tech Support Specialists.Get Help From a Technician LivePlease enable JavaScript
ff7609af8f