MSDN article

Laurent Bugnion

unread,

Feb 20, 2013, 4:51:27 PM2/20/13

to WPF Disciples

I am happy to let you know that the first of a series of articles on MVVM was just published on MSDN.

"IOC Containers and MVVM"

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/jj991965.aspx

Cheers
Laurent
--
Laurent Bugnion
Senior Director, IdentityMine
Microsoft MVP, Regional Director
http://www.galasoft.ch | http://www.identitymine.com
Sent from my beautiful Nokia Lumia 920

Peter O'Hanlon

unread,

Feb 20, 2013, 4:53:31 PM2/20/13

to WPF Disciples

Very nice. I will read it when I get some free time.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "XAML Disciples" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wpf-disciple...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
Peter O'Hanlon

Sacha's Gmail

unread,

Feb 20, 2013, 4:59:01 PM2/20/13

to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com, WPF Disciples

How topical just finished writing my own IOC container for funsies....have to read when I get a moment

Sent from my iPhone

--

Laurent Bugnion

unread,

Feb 20, 2013, 5:15:44 PM2/20/13

to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com

Writing SimpleIoc was really interesting. Turns out it is a very popular component of mvvm light.

Cheers
Laurent

From: Sacha's Gmail
Sent: ‎20.‎02.‎2013 23:07
To: wpf-di...@googlegroups.com
Cc: WPF Disciples
Subject: Re: [WPF Disciples] MSDN article

Laurent Bugnion

unread,

Feb 20, 2013, 5:14:20 PM2/20/13

to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com

I am sure the series will be finished by 2053. Not sure if we will still use MVVM ;)

Cheers
Laurent

From: Peter O'Hanlon
Sent: ‎20.‎02.‎2013 22:56
To: WPF Disciples

Subject: Re: [WPF Disciples] MSDN article

Very nice. I will read it when I get some free time.

On 20 February 2013 21:51, Laurent Bugnion <lau...@galasoft.ch> wrote:

I am happy to let you know that the first of a series of articles on MVVM was just published on MSDN.

"IOC Containers and MVVM"

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/jj991965.aspx

Cheers
Laurent
--
Laurent Bugnion
Senior Director, IdentityMine
Microsoft MVP, Regional Director
http://www.galasoft.ch | http://www.identitymine.com
Sent from my beautiful Nokia Lumia 920

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "XAML Disciples" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wpf-disciple...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--

Peter O'Hanlon

Daniel Vaughan

unread,

Feb 20, 2013, 5:48:04 PM2/20/13

to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com

Way to go Laurent! Congrats mate.

--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "XAML Disciples" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wpf-disciple...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--

Daniel Vaughan

danielvaughan.org

outcoder.com

karl shifflett

unread,

Feb 20, 2013, 9:21:23 PM2/20/13

to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com

Good to see IOC and MVVM getting some press.

Been using WPF/Prism/Unity on my huge Manufacturing application.

My views & view model and business objects never see Unity or Prism.

All dependencies are loaded into the Container using Attributes on concrete classes.

All views are registered with the container using Attributes also.

This is one reason I really love Prism & Unity. Great frameworks that do their work behind the scenes, not necessary to burden view models with low level code.

Best to you all,

Karl

Corrado Cavalli

unread,

Feb 21, 2013, 12:32:15 AM2/21/13

to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com

Congrats!, added to my reading queue.

Cheers,

/Corrado

--

Sacha's Gmail

unread,

Feb 21, 2013, 1:40:35 AM2/21/13

to wpf-di...@googlegroups.com, wpf-di...@googlegroups.com

Agree with Karl. Soc is the way to go. Prism is neat. Truly good the way you can mix and match

Sent from my iPhone

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward