US August employment data was consistent with
“some further improvement” in the labour market. By itself that seems to meet the criteria for
“lift-off” for US interest rates in September, but it’s not that simple.
The only disappointment in the report was the
increase of 173k in non-farm payrolls which was below expectations of a +200k
result. But that disappointment is ameliorated
by the observation that the initial estimate of August payrolls often undershoots
the recent trend, only to benefit from upward revisions in subsequent months.
Everything else in the report pointed in the
right direction. June and July
employment growth was revised up by a combined 44k, jobs growth is increasingly
broad-based, hours worked remains consistent with above trend growth and the
average work week rose.
Average hourly earnings rose 0.3% in the
month although the annual rate of increase remains stuck at 2.2%. Most importantly the unemployment rate fell
to 5.1% - and is now bang on the mid-point of latest Fed estimate of longer run
unemployment (NAIRU). On its own this
data fits the bill for some further improvement in the labour market and supports
the case for “lift-off” in September.
That just leaves the Committee’s interpretation
of recent market volatility. As I said
last week, market volatility by itself should not delay the Fed. Indeed some volatility should be expected
whenever the Fed starts any rate hiking cycle, let alone the first hike in
nearly a decade.
But it’s a different matter if the Committee
views that volatility as indicative of factors that may impact the growth and
inflation outlook in the US. To the
extent that recent volatility has been due to concerns about growth in China,
this week’s release of the usual monthly plethora of Chinese activity data will
add further fuel to the debate. More on
that later in the week.
--
Posted By Bevan Graham to
Economic Insights at 9/07/2015 02:24:00 PM