writ Petition No. of 2006 Ravi Kant Khare, (Baba Ji) S/O Sri Rama kantSonia Gandhi alias Sania Maino of Turin, Italy W/O Late Sri RajivRoberto “Gandhi”

[yogesh saxena]

IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Bench at Luck now

Civil Misc. writ Petition No. 2908 of 2009
( Under Article 226 0f the Constitution Of
India
District- Raibarelly
Ravi Kant Khare, (Baba Ji) S/O Sri Rama kant Khare, Journalist/ Writer/
Publisher and President of Sarva Hitkari seva Sansthan,(unregistered
Society of elite citizens, scholars, Advocates and Writers)., R/O
D.S.- 13, Nirala Nagar, Lucknow- 226020 ----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union of India through its Secretary of Human Resources Ministry,
Govt. Of India, New Delhi.
2. Election Commission of India, through chairman, Election
commission of India, New Delhi
3. State Election Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Luck now
4. Smt. Sonia Gandhi alias Sania Maino of Turin, Italy W/O Late Sri
Rajiv Roberto “Gandhi” President of National Congress Party, 10,Jan
Path, New Delhi
To,
The Hon’ble Chief Justice and his Lordship’s other companion Judges.
The humble application of the applicant submit as under:-
1. That this petition is filed as public Interest litigation as the
petitioner’s organization, which is rendering their service to the
downtrodden people after collecting the data’s useful to the fellow
citizens as being submitted in this petition from the contribution
given by the number of the advocates, elite class of citizens, who
wants to save the nation, but on account of fear from the people
ruling this Nation, including of the fear of the “yes men” of
respondent no. 4, these person or others do not want take the risk of
their life, nor they are interested to take undue advantages of any
type of popularity. The true copy of the book published by the
petitioner relating to his Publications are filed
2. That thus the present public Interest Petition is maintainable
according to the different yard sticks imposed by the Apex Court in
various recent and past Decision.
3. That the petitioner is the representatives of Unregistered
Social organizations, meant for rendering their services and are also
the senior citizen, retired as the Sale Tax Officer by having their
creditability of being honored by different organizations for his
forceful writing benevolent to the citizens and are also beneficial
to the citizens of India in individual capacities. He is having
his desire to protect the integrity, unity and solidarity of our
Nation from the inefficacious designed to rule our country from the
instructions of the alien power as the respondent no. 4 is having the
adherence to the foreign State namely the Italy and is Christian by
religion.
4. That the petitioners seek direction, for the purposes of
enlightenment of the people casting the vote in favour of right
candidate contesting the election to the respondent no. 1 to provide
him the information contained in the following books for the purposes
of enlightenment to the voters of Amethi constituency participating in
the election scheduled to be held on 8th may of 2006. The name of the
books and the writers thereof are “The Nehru Dynasty”, Written by
Astrologer K. N. Rao, “Reminiscences of the Nehru Age” written by Sri
M. O. Mathai (a longtime private secretary, of Jawaharlal Nehru) in
his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI) and Mohammad Yunus book,
‘Persons, Passions & Polities’. The true copy of the book published by
Hindu Writers Forum relating to the Extracts of all these prohibited
Publications is filed herewith and marked
5. Why the extract of this book are prohibited for being known to
general public, who has right of Information Guarantee under Article 19
(1) (a) of the constitution of India and Under the Provision of Right
of Information Act, 2002?
6. That the reason for the purposes of demand of these books
on cost to the public is that the politicians in the conspiracy have
deceived the people of India, who is now called as the Father of the
Nation, in connivance with Sri Jawaharlal Nehru, the First prime
minister of India. As the part of conspiracy to rule our nation and
thereby have the extinction of the Hindu Religion for ever by getting
the partition of our country on Geographical basis and not on the
basis of the reasons of religious fanatics, on which the country was
divided in two parts as it may hamper the progress and the hatred be
perpetuated which may not provide the growth to the Nation as super
power of the world.
“The Nehru Dynasty”, astrologer K. N. Rao mentions the names of
Jawahar Lal’s father and grandfather. Jawahar Lal’s father was
believed to be Moti Lal and Moti Lal’s father was one Gangadhar Nehru.
sri Jawaharlal Nehru’s grand-father belong to Kaul Clan of Kasmir.
Sheikh Mohd. Abdullah hails from their ancestors whose Grand Father
was Bal Mukund Kaul.
That Jawahar Lal’s only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru,
Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis.
She was totally against Indira’s proposed marriage with Feroze Khan,
Why? No one tells us now, who is this Feroze Khan?
One frequently hears that Rajeev/Rajiv Gandhi’s grandfather was Pandit
Nehru. But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the
paternal and the material grandfather. In fact, the paternal
grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most
societies. Why is it then nowhere we find Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal
grandfather’s name?
It appears that the reason is simply this Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal
grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujrat.
This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, the grocer who supplied
wines etc. to Anand Bhavan, had married a Parsi woman after converting
her to Islam.
This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was
derived. Rajiv’s father Feroze was Feroze Khan before he married
Indira, against Kamala Nehru’s wishes. Feroze mother’s family name was
Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi,
sometime before his wedding with Indira by an affidavit.
Indira Gandhi was Chased out of the Shanti Niketan University by Guru
Dev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, She was an isolated girl by
herself, while father Jawaharlal was busy with polities, pretty women
and illicit sex; the mother was in hospital. Feroze Khan, the grocer’s
son was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and
soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim women and
married Feroze Khan in a London mosque.
Indira Gandhi name was also changed as Smt. Maimuna Begam after the
marriage with Firoj Khan?
The news of this married eventually reached Mohandas Karan Chand
Gandhi. Gandhi ji urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to
ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had
nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hindustan for
instance. It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit.
And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi. The surprising thing is that
the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India’s Mahatma
and the ‘Father of the Nation’ didn’t mention this game of his in the
famous book. ‘My Experiments with Truth’ Why?
When they returned to India, a mock ‘Vedic marriage’ was instituted
for public consumption. On the subject, writes M. O. Mathai (a
longtime private secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now
suppressed by the GOI) ‘Reminiscences of the Nehru Age’ on page no.
94, second paragraph: “For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the
marriage to be performed according to Vedic rite in 1942. An inter-
religious and inter-caste marriage Vedic rites at that time was not
valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage. It’s a known
fact that after Rajiv’s birth Indira and Feroze lived separately, but
they were not divorced. Feroze used to harass Nehru frequently for
money and also interfere in Nehru’s political activities. Nehru got
fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime
Minister’s residence Tri-Murthi Bhavan?
Why does the death of Feroze Gandhi in 1960, when he was consolidating
to make his own political set up remained the Mystery?
Feroze had even planned to remarry.
Those who try to keep tabs on our lenders in spite of all the
suppressions and deliberate misinformation are aware of the fact that
the second son Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was
not the son of Feroze. He was the son of another Moslem gentleman,
Mohammad Yunus. Here in passing, we might that the second son was
originally named Sanjeev. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother’s
name.
Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards. M. O. Mathai very
graphically describes at least one case in his “Reminiscences of the
Nehru Age” page 206. Muthai writes: “In the autumn of 1948 ( India
became free in 1947 and a great deal of work needed to be done) a
young woman from Banaras arrived in New Delhi as a sanyasin named
Shraddha Mata ( an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit
Scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology.
People including MPs, thronged to her to hear her discourses. One day
S. D. Upadhyaya, Nehru’s old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from
Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM’s House.
As her departed, I noticed (Mathai is speaking here) that she was
young, shapely and beautiful. Meetings with her became rather
frequent, mostly after Nehru finished his work at night. During one of
Nehru’s visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there, and
Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual. Nehru sent her the
reply, and she visited Nehru at midnight…. Suddenly Shraddha Mata
disappeared.
In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person
to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from
northern India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth
to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars
about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to
move out but left the child behind.
She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which,
among other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother
superior, who was a foreigner, had the letters examined and was, told
they were from the Prime Minister. The person, who brought the letters
surrendered them,. “I (Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly
about the boy but failed to get a clue about his whereabouts. Convents
in such matters are extremely tightlipped and secretive.
Had I succeeded in locating the boy. I would have adopted him. He must
have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his
father was.”
It was claimed to Sanjeev/ sanjay, when the British police in England
and his passport impounded, for having stolen a car, arrested him.
Krishna Menon was then India’s High Commissioner in London. He offered
to issue another passport to the felon who changed his name to
Sanjay.
Incidentally, Sanjay’s marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka (now they
call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of Lord Indra’s court
dancer rather offensive) took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad
Yunus house in New Delhi. And the marriage with Manaka who was a model
(She had modeled for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel) was not so
ordinary either.
Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Sanjay too
rendered Menaka pregnant. It was then that her father. Colonel Anand
threatened Sanjay with dire consequences, if he did not marry her
daughter. And that did the trick. Sanjay married Menaka.
It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was
unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka; apparently he had
wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was
Mohammad Yunus who carried the most-, when Sanjay died in the plane
accident.
In Yunus book, ‘Persons, Passions & Polities’ one discovers that baby
Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the
reason stated was phimosis.
It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and
due to this she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to
run the country as though if were his personal fiefdom.
Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father was?
When the news of Sanjay’s death reaches Indira Gandhi, the first thing
she wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with
him.
Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so
called Parisi religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of
Turin, Italy. Rajiv become Roberto. His daughter’s name is Bianca and
son’s name is Raul. Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the
people of India as Priyanka and Rahul. What is amazing is the extent
of our people’s ignorance in such matters. The press conference that
Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as prime minister of
India was very informative.
In this press conference, Rajiv boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a
Parisi. Mind you, speaking of the Parisi religion, he had no Parisis
ancestor at all. His grandmother (father’s mother) has turned Muslim
after having abandoned the Parisi religion to marry Nawab Khan. It is
the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of
Rajiv.
From the New York Times to the Los Angles Times and the Washington
Post the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children’s encyclopedias
recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the
revered University of Cambridge.
The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that
University, Rajiv had not passed a single examination. He had,
therefore, to leave Cambridge without a certificate. Sonia too had the
same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be student in Cambridge.
Such a description is calculated to mislead Indian. She was a student
in Cambridge all right but not of the University of Cambridge but of
one of those fly by night language schools where foreign student come
to leave English.
Sonia was working as an ‘an pair’ girl in Cambridge and trying to
learn English at the same time. And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was
even cremated as per Vedic rites in full view of India’s public. This
is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now an Italian leads a
prestigious national party because of just one qualification – being
married into the Nehru family. Maneka Gandhi itself is being accepted
by the non-Congress parties, not because she was a former model or an
animal lover, but for her links to the Nehru family. Saying that an
Italian should not lead India will amount to narrow mindedness

7. That Christianity and Muslims have plundered the concept of Vedic
religion from about 2006 A.D. years, prior to it there was the Hindu
Religion was flourishing through out the world. Baba Ambedkar in his
book on “Thoughts on Pakistan” has described the apprehension against
the appeasement policy for Muslims, which as per its gospel of Jihad
being professed in religion speaks of killing of Hindu citizens as
Khafir and Kufr, who are meant for killing instead of being saved for
enjoying by keeping Nihamat and Hurreys for pacifying the carnal
Sexual desire, on the basis of which, the foundations are kept and
based in the other religion.
8. That the background of Sri Jawaharlal Nehru was obviously converted
to be the full-fledged Muslim, as he was nurtured at the place of
Anand Bhawan belonging to Mr. Mubarak Ali, a barrister, at Nawab of
Avadh palaces and at place of Rani of Amethi. Gandhi ji has never
thought of avoiding Martyr Bhagat Singh’s death sentence/
Assassination, for which, even the British pleaded for him , but was
demanding the release of Mr. Abdul Rasheed, the death sentence
convict, who killed Sri Nitya Nand Swami, when he was suffering from
viral fewer. The invitation of Ali Brothers sponsored by Gandhi Ji,
for invading our country by Afghanistan/ Teliban was declared to be
the sedition by British Ruler and thus it appears that our country has
not been ruled by Indian but by Foreign Invaders from such time.
9. That what was the religion of Rajeev Gandhi? . What is the religion
of Sonia Gandhi and her Children? Whether Sonia Gandhi is living in
this country on the strength of Italian Passport? How she can take the
citizen ship and contest the election without disclosing her Religious
Ambitions and political ambition to the people of the constituency,
from where she will get her votes? When assets of the candidate may be
directed to be disclosed by the election commission on the dictates of
the Hon’ble Supreme court of India, why not the president of the
biggest party of the country may be directed to disclose her Religion?
During visit of Pope in India, the entire country became Christian.
Why president Bush and Sonia Gandhi are against the Kingdom of Nepal
as the Hindu Nation?.
10. That Whether Indira Gandhi was married twice or she was married
once?. When she changed her name from Smt. Magnoona Begham to Indira
Gandhi? Whether Rajeev Gandhi and Sanjay Gandhi were the real
Brothers? For being born out of one father or from different fathers?
Whether the people of this country may be befooled forever or there is
any limit of falsehood imposed upon them by these people, who have
never acted for integrity, Solidarity and security of our Nation.
11. That whether we are still slave of our orthodox, primitive and
superstitions? Why we are still trusting with them, who are the anti-
national rather the criminals, who have betrayed our trust , which was
reposed by you? How long we will have the enforced Silence?
12. That Whether the Long slavery, paradoxically enough, makes the
slave to look upon the very change that bind him as his life support?.
This story was told to the convict in ancient time and who was
confined in the dingy cell for fifteen years. After fifteen year the
detainee was set free and he gingerly step out of the prison gate. His
eyes, which were used to the dim light wilted at the bright sunshine
outside everything including traffic, the gazing eyes were the strange
look to the detainee and as such he felt terrified. He took a long
look at the outside world and thereafter he inhaled a deep breath and
there after by a sudden dash he again reached to his dog’s tether in
the cell as his imprisonment has sapped his self-confidence. This is
what has happened in India. Truth will not make us rich, but it will
certainly make us free.
13. That the citizens were having the orthodox feeling and they were
very much living under the domination of superstitions. This was the
reason that the Hindus were subjected to the cruelty by the foreign
invaders.
14. That this feeling of utter destitution, dejection, desperation and
the loss of all confidence is the result of our slavery, by which the
Indians have forgotten their own past history, lost freedom and
obliviousness of the delights of an unfettered life. Thus it is
necessary to keep the flame of the truth burning in the heart of every
enlightened citizen, as the majority of the public is unaware of the
truth. The glory of our country may only be restored, when our
traditional heritage culture may revive every citizen from
unadulterated history. The historical concepts, which were distorted
during the long period of slavery, may become a task of utmost
importance and urgency. An inadequate understanding on impressionable
citizen has resulted the further accessibility in implanting the
misleading concepts and thereby breaking the heads and idols of the
fellow citizen, due to the segmentation of the society in many
compositions.
15. That no man can survive in isolation. There is a rule of give and
take. The moment, one person is inclined to accept everything as a
matter of his right, the person who is inclined to give him his extra
potential, withdraw the basic offer. This becomes the end of social
collaboration. No country is able to survive except by the will of the
people. The bitterness amongst the people may ultimately lead to a
crisis on psychological level. Thus the country required the coercive
method for the enforcement of law and order situation. This was on
account of partition of India.
16. That the disqualification prescribed for membership of Parliament
under article 102 (1) (d) of the constitution of India that the
individual contesting the election may not in any acknowledgement of
allegiance or adherence to a foreign state. It is known to every
citizen that the respondent No.4 is a foreign lady and her husband
namely Rajeev Khan “Gandhi” converted his religion prior to his
marriage with respondent No.4, which he had admitted to the world
media after becoming the Prime Minister of India.
17. That the matter pertaining to the disqualification was referred to
the Election Commission of India for referring the same to the
President Of India by Srimati Sushama Swaraj, than Minister after
consultation with Sri Arun Jaitelly than Law Minister and also Sri
R.V. Bhasin, all Advocates practicing at Supreme court of India, but
it appears that on account of the status of the respondent No. 4,
being the president of Indian Congress party, no body could take any
decision in the matter. Since the Respondent No. 4 is now contesting
again the election as to become full fledge prime Minister Of India
and is having allegiance and adherence to the foreign Country,
Particularly Italy, where she owns the property namely the House, as
she has herself disclosed on affidavit submitted to the District
election officer/District Magistrate and also have her affiliation
with Political parties of such Nation and since the election process
has now started again, the declaration of the result of such result
may be withheld till the decision may not be taken by Election
Commission in this regards.
18. That the extracts passages written in all the three books may
further disclose the game is played with the country men by the
guardian of our nation to whom the people in India have always
regarded as equivalents to the father of the Nation and they were
trusted as head of the Government. The deceptive approach may be
visualized from the passages of all the three books, which have been
suppressed from the approach of general public or being suppressed by
Govt. Of India during Congress regimes during the dynasty of these
person.
19. That whether it is worthwhile to shout a voice and thereby invite
some lighter sleeper to suffer the agony of the death and this purpose
achieved through my writing, may serve some purpose. Since the
daylight shallows the darkness, I have written articles to take the
intellectual from apathetically approach towards rectification of
prevailing maladies as to wake up. The politicians have imposed
mindless socialism, which held in thrall the peoples endeavor and
enterprise resulting in transfer of potential from the honest
benevolent to the dishonest opportunist.
20. That there is always an excuse for tyranny and mal-administration,
which has degenerated the national character. The power given needs a
safeguard from such arbitrary power and unfair exercise. In present
set up freedom has become an abuse and liberty as license. Therefore
the moral damage is more terrible. An oppressive system is more to be
feared, than a Tiger.
21. That the people of this country have completely forgotten the
sacrifices given by guru Teg Bahadur Singh and his brothers, who were
poured inside the boiled oil and beheaded by Aurangzeb period as the
refused to give up Hindu religion. The preaching of Guru Govind Singh
have been forgotten so early by our present prime-minister.
22. That Neta Ji Sri Subhash Chandra Bose, after being elected as the
president of the Congress party was denounced to rule the congress in
league with Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru and at that occasion
Mr. Govind Ballabh Pant and said that the Congress party (created by
Mr. A.Hume and carrying it’s activities on instruction of British
Government) wants the nominated members of the choice of Mahatma
Gandhi be remained as Executives. Neta Ji Left the Party and the
Nation and was declared as War Prisoner, who was required to be handed
over to the British govt., if he would have found alive in our
Country. Jhinnah passed the Pakistan Resolution on 6th June 1940 at
Lahore.
23. That all the peace loving Hindu organizations like R.S.S. and
Jansangh were virtually banned during the period of Indira Gandhi and
Rajeev Gandhi and there were number of cow and bullock slaughter
houses opened in Andhra Pradesh and west Bengal, while subsidy was
provided to number of haz voyages meant for slaughtering the thousands
of cows , camels and sheep’s from the donations of the temples offered
by our Hindu citizens. This was the mockery of situation in our
country.
24. That every one knows that we are seeing the integrated nation only
on account of indulgences of Iron Man Sardar Sri Ballabha Bhai patel
and denouncement of the policy of Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru, who has
created the insurgencies in Kashmir by keeping it beyond the control
of Home Minister purposely for ruling this nation on the cherished
principles of “Divide And Rule” fully experienced in this country and
now the respondent No. 4 is trying to rule upon it from Italy in
consultation of U.S.A. for which George Bush was invited to our
Nation , in spite the insurgencies of Muslims during relevant period
on the issue of cartoon at Denmark’s news papers.
25. That Baba Ambedkar wrote a book named as “Thoughts on Pakistan”
specifying the tendencies of Muslims towards Hindus and ultimately
resigned from parliament as he was deceived by Mr. Jawaharlal Nehru to
capture the votes of Schedule Castes and other backwards class citizen
as he was against reservation of the posts in employment. He adopted
Buddhism on before Two months prior to his death. The rising of
Mahatma Gandhi, when Kamal Passa, the hereditical line of successions
of Mohammad Shahab, was denounced from Turks by allied powers by
doing and participating in KHALIFAT MOVEMENT, the planning to Get Ali
brothers soliciting the support from Afghanistan, now Teliban, and
tendering of apologies to the British Govt. when this Sedition plan
was came to their notice. These were the well known planning of
mahatma Gandhi to take the command of our Nation. The denouncement of
Ambedkar Ji as the representative of Schedule caste and other backward
class citizen in the Round Table Conferences and thereafter the reason
for the arrival of Simon Commission are now well known to people of
this nation and as such Baba Ambedkar had shown his resentment at
the time of Quit India Movement Launched By Mahatma Gandhi. Then Why
he was made the Chairman of Drafting committee of Constitution of
India. The Answer is dividing and Rule Policy adopted By Mr. Nehru.
The hatred is created purposely to perpetuate the policy of DIVIDE AND
RULE in this country by Congress Govt. Unfortunately the change in the
Govt. during B.J.P. Regime has again given power to the Opportunists,
which was prevalent during Congress Regime.
26. That the system of governance is in the hands of Criminal. They
have protection of Article 20 (3) of the Constitution of India, when
they commit crime in animosity or where no witness may be allowed to
turn up against them. The acquittal of the accused in Parliament
attack and acquittal to the accused of Jaisikalal Murder case is not a
Blot on our System. Who is going to accept the truth as defense in
Contempt proceedings and fixing the responsibility of the officer
pronouncing a wrong Judgement? No one. The concept of Plea Bargaining
shall further be abused thus we cannot implement any reform in this
nation. Thus the appease meant with criminals is justified to our
citizens. Kindly wake the people lest it will be too late. The
religious non- violent People will be killed in Godhara train Carnage
Genocides, but the retired Supreme court Judge will report this in his
one Man Inquiry Commission report a mere accident as could not smell
the kerosene, petrol , naphtha and thus safely declared it on the
inefficacious planning of Railways Minister, An accused in fodder
Scam, as having no smell of crime committed by the traitors of our
nation.
The sovereignty and the people should form three
Councils, Educational, Religious and Administrative. One individual
should not have the absolute power of government, the sovereignty
being the general president of the councils .The qualifications of the
president the presidents of separate councils are their interest in
the welfare of the country, their excellence of learning and
character, and their influence over the people. A country prospers as
long as the people are righteous. Also their welfare requires the
appointment of learned educational officers, appointment of learned
men as the dignitaries of the spiritual council and of virtuous
learned men as administrators. Obedience to law is required of all.

27. That “It is common knowledge that 70 percent of the people living
in rural areas are illiterate and even more than that percentage of
the people are not aware of the rights conferred upon them by law.
28. That Even literate people do not know, what are their rights and
entitlements under the law. It is this absence of legal awareness
which is responsible for the deception, exploitation and deprivation
of rights and benefits, from which the poor suffer in this land.
The Student/children, the future citizens under taking the education
of Indian History on the misconception/ pattern of Anglo Saxon
teaching meant for division of Indian society on the policy of “Divide
and Rule”. There is a important question posed as to whether we have
actually gain our independence or we have to under take another
journey full of animosity, aggresses on account of terrorism and
fanatic ideology a prevalent throughout the World of a particular
religion. Thus on account of being sentinel /Guardian at large, this
is the voice of the majority of Hindu Citizens to save our ancestral
cultural heritage and there by to give protection to our future
citizens
29. That their legal needs always stand to become crisis-oriented
because their ignorance prevents them from anticipating legal troubles
and approaching a lawyer for consultation and advice in time and their
poverty magnifies the impact of the legal trouble and difficulties
when they come.
30. That more over, because of their ignorance and illiteracy, they
cannot become self-reliant; they cannot even help themselves. The law
ceases to be their protector because they do not know that they are
entitled to the protection of the law and they can avail of the legal
service programmer for putting an end to their exploitation and
winning their rights.
31. That the result is that poverty becomes with them, as a condition
of total helplessness. This miserable condition in which the poor find
themselves can be added to situations”
32. That “The busybodies meddlesome interlopers, wayfarers, or
officious interveners having absolutely no public interest, except for
personal gain or private profit, either for themselves or as proxy of
others or for any other extraneous motivation or for glare of
publicity break the queue muffling their faces.”
33. That Article 14 has a pervasive potency and a versatile quality,
equalitarian in its soul, but allergic to discriminatory dictates. It
is well known that equality is anti-thesis to arbitrariness. Since the
license may not be given to a blind man to drive a car, how
worthwhile, it may be to give the similar license to a criminal to do
every sort of atrocities being committed by indulging into the crime
of the innocent people.
34. That there are inherent restrictions applicable for the
enforcement of the individual personal right under article 19, which
empowers the state to enforce reasonable restriction on the exercise
of the right of the people in the interest of sovereignty, integrity
of India security of the state, friendly relations with foreign state,
public order, decency or morality etc. including the incitement to an
offence pertaining to the reasonable restrictions regarding freedom of
speech and expression, to assemble ,to form associations and freedom
to reside and move freely throughout the territory of India.
35. That “ We, the People” are still like cavemen with our back turn
to light watching the shadow of the wall. There is an iron cage, not
having any ventilation and people are living in the state of
suffocation, virtually on the verge of their death point. There is a
complete apathy of the custodian of the power towards their welfare
and in our country "We, the people" who are regarded to be the
sovereign of the nation, are living a life full of abrogation and
subjugation.
a. All the members of the court are considered as wounded, where
justice is found wounded with inequity, and judges do not extract the
dart of inequity from justice or remove its blot and destroy inequity,
in other words where the innocent are not respected and the criminal
are not punished.
b. A virtuous and just person should never enter a court and when he
does so, he should speak the truth; he who holds his tongue on seeing
injustice done, or speaks contrary to truth and justice, is the
greatest sinner.
c. Justice destroyed destroys its destroyer; and justice preserved,
preserves its preserver. Hence, never destroy justice, lest being
destroyed; it should destroy thee.
d. In this world justice or righteousness alone is man’s friend that
goes with him after death. All other things or companions part on the
destruction of the body and he is detached from all company. But the
company of justice is never cut off.
e. When injustice is done in the government court out of partiality,
the criminal or doer of injustice, the second by the witness, the
third by the judges, and the fourth by the president king of an unjust
court divides it into four parts of which one is shared.
36. That the lawyers are always having perplexed with fear of change.
He knoweth not the law, who knoweth not the reason there of,
therefore, it is not advisable to live in cloistered seclusion,
detached from the world and all its pursuits. If you are ever tempted
to join in the fierce hunt after the vulgar prizes of the world,
remember that after all. That accretes and frets his hour upon the
stage, and then is heard no more.
“There is a land in the present age,
Where the people live in graves
Liberty, freedom all unknown,
Service and be slaves.
The people are living in free past glory of their own,
As an outright, beggars would had sung,
Well once upon a time. I was a king
When such of the attitude of the people
How can they get the freedom,
Least to talk of liberty.
Yet a certain day may come
When the people will hum
In the orchard of freedom
Taste the juice of liberty”.
(Not hearsay, not gossip, not publicity, but action.)
37. That it has been observed by the Hon’ble Courts “where the power
is conferred to achieve a purpose it has been repeatedly reiterated
that the power must be exercised reasonably and in good faith to
effectuate the purpose. And in this context ‘ in good faith’ means
‘for legitimate reasons’. Where power is exercised for extraneous or
irrelevant considerations or reasons, it is unquestionably a colorable
exercise of power or fraud on power and the exercise of power is
vitiated”.
38. That the Hon’ble Supreme Court has also held that ‘ Pithily put,
bad faith which invalidates the exercise of power- sometimes called
colorable exercise or fraud on power and oftentimes overlaps motives,
passions and satisfactions- is the attainment of ends beyond the
sanctioned purposes of power by simulation or pretension of gaining a
legitimate goal. If the use of the power is for the fulfillment of a
legitimate object the actuation or catalysation by malice is not
legicidal. The action is bad where the true object is to reach an end
different from the one for which the power is entrusted, goaded by
extraneous considerations, good or bad, but irrelevant to the
entrustment. When the custodian of power is influenced in its exercise
by considerations out side those for promotion of which the power is
vested the court calls it a colorable exercise and is undeceived by
illusion’.
39. That Transparency of action and accountability are perhaps two
possible safeguards, which the court enforcing the protection of
fundamental rights must insist upon. Thus police in India requiring to
perform a difficult and delegate task in view of the deteriorating law
and order situation, communal riots, politics turns to student unrest,
terrorist activities, dealing with hard core criminals, drug peddlers,
smugglers having strong root in society, will feel difficulties in the
detection of the crime committed by the hardened criminals. Thus a
balanced justice approach is needed to meet the ends of justice. The
cure cannot however, be worst them the diseased itself.

In Keshavanand Bharti Vs state of Kerala A.I.R 1973 S. C. Page 1431
Justice Matthew held "The fundamental rights have no fixed content,
most of them are empty vessels into which each generation must pour
its content in the light of its experience. It is relevant in this
context to remember that in building of just social order, it is
sometimes imperative that the fundamental rights should be somewhat
related to directive principles. The following rights are held to be
covered world under article 21.
40. That Hon’ble Supreme court has taken into account two spheres of
dimensions to the right of personal liberty against the sovereign
power exercising its functioning. Thus personal liberty is a sacred
and cherished right under the constitution (UBI JUS IBI REMIDIUM).
41. That Where the public functionaries were involved in such a
malafide and colourable exercise of power that may abridge or abrogate
the right of livelihood of a citizen duly guaranteed under Article 21
of the Constitution.
42. That we are now slave of destructive elements and foreign
ambitions. Politicians act in nefarious designs with impunity.
Political parties motivated with vested interests are dancing to usurp
power through any means, fair or foul even at the cost of sacrificing
the Nation’s existence to personal interest. Party systems have pushed
to advance its own schemes upon the ruin of the rest. Our politicians
are Mafia dons next to the invaders. Robbers have generally plundered
the rich who are seldom subjected to legislation always plunder the
common citizens and protect those Mafia dons under the phraseology of
“law making sovereign power” having the connotation “procedure
establish under law to be cherished instead of due process”.
That the Freedom of expression may be necessarily including right of
information. There is no expression with out having an idea on the
subject, regarding which the expression of an individual may be given
effect to change the existing values an ideology which are based on
the notable extracts of certain facts .An enlightening informed
citizen would undoubtedly enhance democratic values (People’s Union
for Civil liberty (P U C L) Vs. Union of India) (2003) 4 SCC Para 94.
43. That “The freedom of speech and expression is basic to indivisible
from a democratic polity .It includes right to impart and receive
information. Restriction to the said right could be only as provided
in article 19(2). Right of a voter to know the bio-data of the
candidate is the foundation of the democracy. The old dictum let the
people have the truth and the freedom to discuss it and all will go
well with the Government should prevail. The true test for deciding
the validity of the Act is whether it takes away or abridges
fundamental right of the citizens. If there is direct abridgement of
the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression, the law
would be invalid. If the provisions of the law violate the
constitutional provisions, they have to be struck down and that is
what is required to be done in the present case .It is made clear that
no provision is nullified on the ground that the Court does not
approve the underlying policy of the enactment. (Para 69 to 71 and
66). (People’s Union for Civil liberties (P U C L) Vs. Union of India,
(2003) 4 SCC 399:AIR 2003 SC 2363.
The right to live with human dignity free from exploitation (A.I.R
1980 S. C 849) and the right of livelihood (A.I.R 1986 S. C. 180)
respectively was also considered to be within ambit of article 21.
Every endeavor has been provided till now to make this article
reverberate with life and articulate with meaning.

44. It has been held that authority not performing their statutory
duties to enforce laws for the protection of environment inre- J.T
1996 (2) S. C 196 and J.T 1996 (7) S. C. 775 are jeopardizing the
right of life of the citizen. However the authorities have still to
provide protection by providing a fool proof.
The constitution is required to kept young energetic and alive .The
attempt be endure to expand the ambit of fundamental right. It is said
that the dignity of the ocean lies not in its fury capable of causing
destruction, but in its vast extent and depth with enormous tolerance.
Thus the wider the power, the higher the need of caution and care,
while exercising the power.


45. They have the threat of being subjected to atrocities if the
drastic step to save the citizens from the oppression and exposure of
falsehood may not be done at an earliest time. Thus every nationalist
who has got a slightest patriotic cult in his inhibition has got a
Fundamental Right and a Constitutional Duty to safe guard our cultural
heritage against the falsehood. Imparting of education is a State
function. The State, however, having regard to its financial and other
constraints is not always in a position to perform its duties. The
function of imparting education has been, to a large extent, taken
over by the citizens themselves. Some do it as pure charity; some do
it for protection.
Now the sovereignty is attributed upon the three institution namely
the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. The combined effect
of the three institutions makes a democratic society. The legislature
is creature like lord Brahma while the executives like lord Vishnu may
provide the welfare to the public. The judicial institutions like lord
Shiva is the dispenser of justice and is also the protector of all
subjects. The law of retributive justice wakes when the people sleep.
Hence wise men regard the law or punishment as virtue or religion.

46. The constitution as it stands does not proceed on the “melting pot
“theory while it represents a “salad bowls” where there is homogeneity
without any obliteration of identity. The foundation of the religion
is spiritualism, which is based on trust and confidence and an ability
to strive for the good self of the other individual.
The freedom of speech and expression is basic to
indivisible from a democratic polity .It includes right to impart and
receive information. Restriction to the said right could be only as
provided in article 19(2) to (6) of our Costitution. Right of a voter
to know the bio-data of the candidate is the foundation of the
democracy. The old dictum let the people have the truth and the
freedom to discuss it and all will go well with the Government should
prevail. The true test for deciding the validity of the Act is whether
it takes away or abridges fundamental right of the citizens. If there
is direct abridgement of the fundamental right of freedom of speech
and expression, the law would be invalid. If the provisions of the law
violate the constitutional provisions, they have to be struck down and
that is what is required to be done in the present case .It is made
clear that no provision is nullified on the ground that the Court does
not approve the underlying policy of the enactment.

47. The people of our country has right to know every public Act and
the principle of finality may not be insisted upon as the maxim
“interest reipublicae ut sit finis litiun”. Wisdom and advisability of
public policy may be demonstrated in order to given effect to the
statutory provisions under our constitution.
“To control the ill effects of money power and muscle power the
commissions recommend that even the election system should be
overhauled and drastically changed lest democracy would become a
teasing illusion to common citizens of this country. Not only a half
hearted attempt in the direction of the reform of the election system
is to be taken as has been done by the present legislation by amending
some provisions of the act here and there, but a much improved
election system is required to be evolved to make the election process
both transparent and accountable as that influence of tainted money
and physical force of criminals do not make democracy a farce the
citizens fundamental “Right to Information” should be recognized and
fully effectuated (Para 127) (People’s Union for Civil liberties (P U
C L) Vs. Union of India,(2003) 4 SCC 399:AIR 2003 SC 2363.
48. The ambit and scope of “Right to Know “ is conferred fundamental
right under article19 (1)(a) of the Constitution of India read with
the provision of Freedom of Information Act,2002 .The right to get
information in democracy is recognized all throughout and it is a
natural right flowing from the concept of democracy itself Freedom of
expression may be necessarily include right of information. There is
no expression with out having an idea on the subject, regarding which
the expression of an individual may be given effect to change the
existing values an ideology which are based on the notable extracts of
certain facts.
Justice is a virtue, which transcends all barriers in the way of
administration of justice. This is the acknowledged position of law
that no party can be forced to suffer for the inaction or omission on
the part of law enforcement agencies and whosoever he may be strong.
Every decision will be passed according to the procedure established
by law. Thus the law has to bend before justice. No court can restore
the broken heart of the justice and he should provide such protection,
which is necessary for them like dutiful parents.

It is fundamental that if rule of law is to have any meaning and
content, the authority of the court or a statutory authority and the
confidence of the public in them should not be allowed to be shaken,
diluted or undermined. The courts of justice and all tribunals
exercising judicial functions from the highest to the lowest are by
their Constitution entrusted with functions directly connected with
the administration of justice. It is that expectation and confidence
of all those, who have or are likely to have business in that court or
tribunal, which should be maintained so that the court/tribunal
perform all their functions on a higher level of rectitude without
fear or favour, affection or ill-will.

49. That It has been held that “The newspapers serve as a medium of
exercise of freedom of speech. The right of its shareholder to have a
free press is a fundamental right. Advertisements in newspapers play
an important role in the matter of revenue of the newspaper and have a
direct nexus with its circulation. For the purpose of meeting the
costs of the newsprint as also for meeting other financial
liabilities, which would include the liability to pay wages,
allowances and gratuity etc. To the working journalist as also
liability to pay a reasonable profit to the share holders vis-a-vis
making the newspapers available to the readers at a price at which
they can afford to purchase it , the petitioners have no other option
but to collect more funds by publishing commercial and other
advertisements in the newspaper.(Paras 33,36,34and 38) .Hindustan
Times Vs State of U. P.(2003) 1 SCC 591,AIR 2003 SC 250,(2003) 1 LLJ
206: (2002) 258 ITR 469.
50. That under these circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed
that the decision on the disqualification as contemplated under
Article 102 (1) (d ) read with Article 9 of the Constitution of India
may be directed to be taken by the Respondent No. 2 for its
recommending to the matter to the President of India regarding
adherence of the Respondent No. 4 with Foreign Country as per her own
affidavit submitted in respect of her family assets and since the
election process has been commenced , the counting and declaration of
the result may be differed till such decision.
Grounds
1) Because this petition is filed as public Interest litigation as the
petitioners are rendering their service to the downtrodden people
after collecting these data’s submitted in this petition from number
of the advocates, elite class of citizens, who wants to save the
nation but on account of fear from the people including of the fear of
the yes men of respondent no. 4, the petitioners or they do not want
take the risk of their life, nor they are interested to take undue
advantages of any type of popularity
2) Because the petitioners seek direction, for the purposes of
enlightenment of the people casting the vote in favour of right
candidate contesting the election to the respondent no. 1 to provide
him the information contained in the following books for the purposes
of enlightenment to the voters of Amethi constituency participating in
the election scheduled to be held on 8th may of 2006.
3) Because one may know that what was the religion of Rajeev
Gandhi? . What is the religion of Sonia Gandhi and her Children?
Whether Sonia Gandhi is living in this country on the strength of
Italian Passport? How she can take the citizen ship and contest the
election without disclosing her Religious Ambitions and political
ambition to the people of the constituency, from where she will get
her votes? When assets of the candidate may be directed to be
disclosed by the election commission on the dictates of the Hon’ble
Supreme court of India, why not the president of the biggest party of
the country may be directed to disclose her Religion?
4) Because this feeling of utter destitution, dejection, desperation
and the loss of all confidence is the result of our slavery, by which
the Indians have forgotten their own past history, lost freedom and
obliviousness of the delights of an unfettered life. Thus it is
necessary to keep the flame of the truth burning in the heart of every
enlightened citizen, as the majority of the public is unaware of the
truth. The glory of our country may only be restored, when our
traditional heritage culture may revive every citizen from
unadulterated history. The historical concepts, which were distorted
during the long period of slavery, may become a task of utmost
importance and urgency.
5) Because the busybodies meddlesome interlopers, wayfarers, or
officious interveners having absolutely no public interest, except for
personal gain or private profit, either for themselves or as proxy of
others or for any other extraneous motivation or for glare of
publicity break the queue muffling their faces.”
6) Because the lawyers are always having perplexed with fear of
change. He knoweth not the law, who knoweth not the reason there of,
therefore, it is not advisable to live in cloistered seclusion,
detached from the world and all its pursuits. If you are ever tempted
to join in the fierce hunt after the vulgar prizes of the world,
remember that after all.
7) Because it has been observed by the Hon’ble Courts “where the
power is conferred to achieve a purpose it has been repeatedly
reiterated that the power must be exercised reasonably and in good
faith to effectuate the purpose. And in this context ‘ in good faith’
means ‘for legitimate reasons’. Where power is exercised for
extraneous or irrelevant considerations or reasons, it is
unquestionably a colorable exercise of power or fraud on power and the
exercise of power is vitiated”.
8) Because the Hon’ble Supreme Court has also held that ‘ Pithily
put, bad faith which invalidates the exercise of power- sometimes
called colorable exercise or fraud on power and oftentimes overlaps
motives, passions and satisfactions- is the attainment of ends beyond
the sanctioned purposes of power by simulation or pretension of
gaining a legitimate goal. If the use of the power is for the
fulfillment of a legitimate object the actuation or catalysation by
malice is not legicidal. The action is bad where the true object is to
reach an end different from the one for which the power is entrusted,
goaded by extraneous considerations, good or bad, but irrelevant to
the entrustment. When the custodian of power is influenced in its
exercise by considerations out side those for promotion of which the
power is vested the court calls it a colorable exercise and is
undeceived by illusion’.
9) Because Transparency of action and accountability are perhaps two
possible safeguards, which the court enforcing the protection of
fundamental rights must insist upon. Thus police in India requiring to
perform a difficult and delegate task in view of the deteriorating law
and order situation, communal riots, politics turns to student unrest,
terrorist activities, dealing with hard core criminals, drug peddlers,
smugglers having strong root in society, will feel difficulties in the
detection of the crime committed by the hardened criminals. Thus a
balanced justice approach is needed to meet the ends of justice. The
cure cannot however, be worst them the diseased itself.
10) Because in Keshavanand Bharti Vs state of Kerala A.I.R 1973 S.
C. Page 1431 Justice Matthew held "The fundamental rights have no
fixed content, most of them are empty vessels into which each
generation must pour its content in the light of its experience. It is
relevant in this context to remember that in building of just social
order, it is sometimes imperative that the fundamental rights should
be somewhat related to directive principles. The following rights are
held to be covered world under article 21.
11) Because Hon’ble Supreme court has taken into account two spheres
of dimensions to the right of personal liberty against the sovereign
power exercising its functioning. Thus personal liberty is a sacred
and cherished right under the constitution (UBI JUS IBI REMIDIUM).
12) Because where the public functionaries were involved in such a
malafide and colourable exercise of power that may abridge or abrogate
the right of livelihood of a citizen duly guaranteed under Article 21
of the Constitution.
13) Because we are now slave of destructive elements and foreign
ambitions. Politicians act in nefarious designs with impunity.
Political parties motivated with vested interests are dancing to usurp
power through any means, fair or foul even at the cost of sacrificing
the Nation’s existence to personal interest. Party systems have pushed
to advance its own schemes upon the ruin of the rest. Our politicians
are Mafia dons next to the invaders. Robbers have generally plundered
the rich who are seldom subjected to legislation always plunder the
common citizens and protect those Mafia dons under the phraseology of
“law making sovereign power” having the connotation “procedure
establish under law to be cherished instead of due process”.
14) Because the Freedom of expression may be necessarily including
right of information. There is no expression with out having an idea
on the subject, regarding which the expression of an individual may be
given effect to change the existing values an ideology which are based
on the notable extracts of certain facts .An enlightening informed
citizen would undoubtedly enhance democratic values (People’s Union
for Civil liberty (P U C L) Vs. Union of India) (2003) 4 SCC Para 94.
15) Because “The freedom of speech and expression is basic to
indivisible from a democratic polity .It includes right to impart and
receive information. Restriction to the said right could be only as
provided in article 19(2). Right of a voter to know the bio-data of
the candidate is the foundation of the democracy. The old dictum let
the people have the truth and the freedom to discuss it and all will
go well with the Government should prevail. The true test for deciding
the validity of the Act is whether it takes away or abridges
fundamental right of the citizens. If there is direct abridgement of
the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression, the law
would be invalid. If the provisions of the law violate the
constitutional provisions, they have to be struck down and that is
what is required to be done in the present case .It is made clear that
no provision is nullified on the ground that the Court does not
approve the underlying policy of the enactment. (Para 69 to 71 and
66). (People’s Union for Civil liberties (P U C L) Vs. Union of India,
(2003) 4 SCC 399:AIR 2003 SC 2363.
16) Because the right to live with human dignity free from
exploitation (A.I.R 1980 S. C 849) and the right of livelihood (A.I.R
1986 S. C. 180) respectively was also considered to be within ambit of
article 21. Every endeavor has been provided till now to make this
article reverberate with life and articulate with meaning.
17) Because it has been held that authority not performing their
statutory duties to enforce laws for the protection of environment
inre- J.T 1996 (2) S. C 196 and J.T 1996 (7) S. C. 775 are
jeopardizing the right of life of the citizen. However the authorities
have still to provide protection by providing a fool proof.
18) Because the constitution is required to kept young energetic and
alive .The attempt be endure to expand the ambit of fundamental right.
It is said that the dignity of the ocean lies not in its fury capable
of causing destruction, but in its vast extent and depth with enormous
tolerance. Thus the wider the power, the higher the need of caution
and care, while exercising the power.
19) Because the threat of being subjected to atrocities if the
drastic step to save the citizens from the oppression and exposure of
falsehood may not be done at an earliest time. Thus every nationalist
who has got a slightest patriotic cult in his inhibition has got a
Fundamental Right and a Constitutional Duty to safe guard our cultural
heritage against the falsehood. Imparting of education is a State
function. The State, however, having regard to its financial and other
constraints is not always in a position to perform its duties. The
function of imparting education has been, to a large extent, taken
over by the citizens themselves. Some do it as pure charity; some do
it for protection.
20) Because now the sovereignty is attributed upon the three
institution namely the legislature, the executive and the judiciary.
The combined effect of the three institutions makes a democratic
society. The legislature is creature like lord Brahma while the
executives like lord Vishnu may provide the welfare to the public. The
judicial institutions like lord Shiva is the dispenser of justice and
is also the protector of all subjects. The law of retributive justice
wakes when the people sleep. Hence wise men regard the law or
punishment as virtue or religion.
21) Because the constitution as it stands does not proceed on the
“melting pot “theory while it represents a “salad bowls” where there
is homogeneity without any obliteration of identity. The foundation of
the religion is spiritualism, which is based on trust and confidence
and an ability to strive for the good self of the other individual.
22) Because the disqualification prescribed for membership of
Parliament under article 102 (1) (d) of the constitution of India that
the individual contesting the election may not in any acknowledgement
of allegiance or adherence to a foreign state. It is known to every
citizen that the respondent No.4 is a foreign lady and her husband
namely Rajeev Khan “Gandhi” converted his religion prior to his
marriage with respondent No.4, which he had admitted to the world
media after becoming the Prime Minister of India.
23) Because the matter pertaining to the disqualification was
referred to the Election Commission of India for referring the same to
the President Of India by Srimati Sushama Swaraj, than Minister after
consultation with Sri Arun Jaitelly than Law Minister and also Sri
R.V. Bhasin, all Advocates practicing at Supreme court of India, but
it appears that on account of the status of the respondent No. 4 being
the president of Indian Congress party, no body could take any
decision in the matter. Since the Respondent No. 4 is now contesting
again the election as to become full fledge prime Minister Of India
and is having allegiance and adherence to the foreign Country,
Particularly Italy, where she owns the property namely the House, as
she has herself disclosed on affidavit submitted to the District
election officer/District Magistrate and also have her affiliation
with Political parties of such Nation and since the election process
has now started again , the declaration of the result of such result
may be withheld till the decision may not be taken by Election
Commission in this regards.
24) Because the extracts passages written in all the three books may
further disclose the game is played with the country men by the
guardian of our nation to whom the people in India have always
regarded as equivalents to the father of the Nation and they were
trusted as head of the Government. The deceptive approach may be
visualized from the passages of all the three books, “The Nehru
Dynasty”, Written by Astrologer K. N. Rao, “Reminiscences of the Nehru
Age” written by Sri M. O. Mathai (a longtime private secretary, of
Jawaharlal Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI) and
Mohammad Yunus book, ‘Persons, Passions & Polities’ which have been
suppressed from the approach of general public or being suppressed by
Govt. Of India.

Prayer
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may
graciously be pleased to :-
1)issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing
the respondent no. 2 to decide the matter relating to the
disqualification of the respondent no. 4 pertaining to her adherence
and allegiance to the foreign state namely Italy, for which, the
matter was already represented for having the decision thereof after
the previous election , under article 103 of Constitution of India to
the President of India and till the decision was not taken by the
respondent no. 2, the election result in furtherance of the election
of Respondent no. 4 may not be declared.
2)issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus
directing the respondent no. 1 to produce the books namely ”The Nehru
Dynasty” written by Sri K. N. Rao, Reminiscences of “Nehru Age”
written by his long time private secretary, Sri M. O. Mathai and Book
written by Mohammed Yunus book person “Persons, Passion & Politics”.
For the perusal of this Hon’ble Court to confirm the authenticity of
the Article published by the Hindu Writers Forum filed as Annexure 4
to this writ petition
3) Any other order or direction /writ, which may deemed fit by the
Hon’ble Court.

Dated 3rd May,2009 (Yogesh Kumar Saxena)

Advocate
Counsel
for the Petitioner
Chamber No. 139, High Court,
Allahabad

























IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Bench at Luck now







Civil Misc. Ad- Interim Application No.
of 2006
(Under Chapter XXII Rule 1 of the Rules of the Court read with
section 151 C. P. C. )
Civil Misc. writ Petition No. of 2006
( Under Article 226 of constitution of
India)
District- Raibarelly
Ravi Kant Khare, (Baba Ji) S/O Sri Rama kant Khare, Journalist/ Writer/
Publisher and President of Sarva Hitkari seva Sansthan,(unregistered
Society of elite citizens, scholars, Advocates and Writers)., R/O
D.S.- 13, Nirala Nagar, Lucknow- 226020 ----Petitioner
Versus
3. Union of India through its Secretary of Human Resources Ministry,
Govt. Of India, New Delhi.
4. Election Commission of India, through chairman, Election
commission of India, New Delhi
5. State Election Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Luck now
6. Smt. Sonia Gandhi alias Sania Maino of Turin, Italy W/O Late Sri
Rajiv Roberto “Gandhi” President of National Congress Party, 10,Jan
Path, New Delhi
To,
The Hon’ble Chief Justice and his Lordship’s other companion Judges.
The humble application of the applicant submit as under:-
1. That this petition is filed as public Interest litigation as the
petitioner’s organization, which is rendering their service to the
downtrodden people after collecting the data’s useful to the fellow
citizens as being submitted in this petition from the contribution
given by the number of the advocates, elite class of citizens, who
wants to save the nation, but on account of fear from the people
ruling this Nation, including of the fear of the “yes men” of
respondent no. 4, these person or others do not want take the risk of
their life, nor they are interested to take undue advantages of any
type of popularity.
2. That this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased by directing the
respondent no. 2 and 3 to decide the matter relating to the
disqualification of the respondent no. 4 pertaining to her adherence
and allegiance to the foreign state namely Italy, for which, the
matter was already represented for having the decision thereof after
the previous election , under article 103 of Constitution of India to
the President of India and till the decision was not taken by the
respondent no. 2, the election result in furtherance of the election
of Respondent no. 4 may not be declared.

Prayer
It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may
graciously be pleased to directing the respondent no. 2 to decide the
matter relating to the disqualification of the respondent no. 4
pertaining to her adherence and allegiance to the foreign state namely
Italy, for which, the matter was already represented for having the
decision thereof after the previous election , under article 103 of
Constitution of India to the President of India and till the decision
was not taken by the respondent no. 2, the election result in
furtherance of the election of Respondent no. 4 may not be declared.
Or to pass any other order or direction /writ, which may deemed fit by
the Hon’ble Court.

Dated 3rd May,2006 (Yogesh Kumar Saxena)

Advocate
Counsel
for the Petitioner
Chamber No. 139, High Court,
Allahabad












IN THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Bench at Luck now
Index
Civil Misc. writ Petition No. of
2006
( Under Article 226 0f the Constitution Of
India
District- Raibarelly
Ravi Kant Khare, (Baba Ji) S/O Sri Rama kant Khare, Journalist/ Writer/
Publisher and President of Sarva Hitkari seva Sansthan,(unregistered
Society of elite citizens, scholars, Advocates and Writers)., R/O
D.S.- 13, Nirala Nagar, Lucknow- 226020 ----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union of India through its Secretary of Human Resources Ministry,
Govt. Of India, New Delhi.
2. Election Commission of India, through chairman, Election
commission of India, New Delhi
3. State Election Commission, Uttar Pradesh, Luck now
4. Smt. Sonia Gandhi alias Sania Maino of Turin, Italy W/O Late Sri
Rajiv
Roberto “Gandhi” President of National Congress Party, 10,Jan
Path,
New Delhi---------------------------------Respondents









Dated 3rd May,2006 (Yogesh Kumar Saxena)

Advocate
Counsel
for the Petitioner
Chamber No. 139, High Court,
Allahabad