I have never understood why the veil, in countries where it is not
required (which I find a violation of personal rights), is such a
contentious symbol. As we learned, it started out as a relic of Middle
Eastern fashion, when women wore it as a status symbol, like pearl
necklaces or designer jeans in the West. When countries such as France
try to ban the veil, they are trampling women's expression as much as
the Iranian theocracy.
On the other hand, I had to disagree with Navila when she cited some
of her reasons for wearing the veil. As we learned, the Koran does not
explicitly state that a woman must wear a veil, and "modest dress" can
be interpreted any number of ways. The analogy about offering fruit to
hungry people and then snatching it away was clever, but missed the
point, as far as I can tell--in a perfect, lawful society, a woman
should be allowed to walk down the street in a bikini without being
accosted (although even the United States has a way to go in this
matter). A provocatively dressed woman is not "asking for it." Wearing
the veil out of personal choice is admirable when one considers all
the opposing social pressures, but when you make those kinds of
justifications, you miss the point.