Australian attack against Tubbataha Reef (Sulu Sea)?

[Arnold Tarrobago]

What possible benefit can this "experiment" ever hope to achieve? Parang nagpapa-loko na lang tayo nito a!

See the blind beggars dance, the cripples sing, the idiot a hero, the lunatic, king...

---

From: eonne...@eon3.net
Subject: World Body Warns Over Ocean ‘Fertilization’ To Fix Climate Change
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:25:55 -0800

preview snip:  Environmental groups on Monday called on the Philippine government to stop an Australian company’s plan to dump hundreds of tonnes of urea fertilizer into the Sulu Sea, site of the UNESCO World Heritage Tubbataha Reef Marine Park, as an experiment.

============

Published on Tuesday, November 13, 2007 by Agence France Presse

World Body Warns Over Ocean ‘Fertilization’ To Fix Climate Change

LONDON — Countries gathered under an international accord on maritime pollution have warned against offbeat experiments to tackle climate change by sowing the sea with chemicals to help soak up airborne carbon dioxide (CO2).1113 05

Parties to the London Convention and London Protocol declared that they hold authority over such experiments, and “large-scale operations” of this kind “are currently not justified,” according to a statement issued on Monday.

Several controversial experiments have been carried out or are being planned to “fertilize” areas of the sea with iron or urea to see whether this encourages the growth of plankton.

Much of the CO2 emitted by fossil fuels is dissolved by the sea from the atmosphere.

In turn, microscopic marine plants at the sea surface absorb some of the CO2 through photosynthesis. When they die, they fall to the ocean floor, thus potentially storing the carbon for millions of years.

Defenders of fertilization say that carbon pollution is so far out of control that a swift fix is needed to avert catastrophe for the climate system.

By accelerating plankton growth, carbon could be massively sucked out of Earth’s atmosphere, reducing the warming effect of this greenhouse gas, they argue.

But marine biologists and climate scientists say the experiments are hedged with environmental peril, such as the risk that runaway algal growth could starve swathes of the ocean of oxygen.

Monday’s statement said the London Convention and London Protocol parties agreed a five-point position on ocean fertilization at their 29th consultative meeting on Friday.

They endorsed a “statement of concern” by expert opinion to this panel, and said consideration of ocean fertilization fell within their purview for protecting the marine environment.

The parties urged states “to use the utmost caution when considering proposals for large-scale ocean fertilization operations,” the communique said.

“Given the present state of knowledge regarding ocean fertilization, such large-scale operations are currently not justified.”

The London Convention and Protocols come under the International Maritime Organization (IMO).

The 1972 London accord, called the “Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter 1972,” has 82 signatory states.

It was followed in 1996 by a tougher agreement, the London Protocol, under which all dumping is prohibited, except for “possibly acceptable” wastes on the so-called “reverse list”. There are are currently 31 Parties to the Protocol.

Earlier this year, the UN’s Nobel-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said that ocean fertilization and other geo-engineering schemes, such as erecting a giant parasol in orbit to cool the planet, were “largely speculative and with the risk of unknown side effects.”

In a study published on Sunday by the British journal Nature, scientists confirmed that plankton can suck up far more CO2 than previously realized, but stressed that the damage to the marine ecoystem was unknown.

German-led researchers closed off part of Raune fjord in southern Norway to see how plankton reacted to different levels of CO2, simulating emissions levels that likely to prevail over the next 150 years.

The organisms were able to gobble up to 39 percent more dissolved carbon compared with today, but did not need any additional nutrients to achieve this.

The paper, though, warned that algal blooms could inflict oxygen depletion in some parts of the ocean while rising carbon levels could cause an imbalance in primary nutrients, with implications that could ripple across the marine food web.

Environmental groups on Monday called on the Philippine government to stop an Australian company’s plan to dump hundreds of tonnes of urea fertilizer into the Sulu Sea, site of the UNESCO World Heritage Tubbataha Reef Marine Park, as an experiment.

© 2007 Agence France Presse

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.

Article printed from www.CommonDreams.org

URL to article: http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/11/13/5193/

____________________________

EON

The Ecological Options Network

"Documenting Deep Democracy"

            www.eon3.net

---

Blog it to your Space with Live Writer! Live Writer