-------- Original Message --------
Dear Tyler,
The following are our comments related to the Parcel U/Forest
Hills development project.
We are concerned that there is not enough retail/community space
in the project. Parcel U is part of a larger vision for Forest
Hills that will increase density around the transit station and
provide the amenities necessary to promote pedestrian activities.
Potential users of the retail and community space will be the new
residents of this development and future developments, the
existing surrounding residents, and the thousands of commuters
passing through Forest Hills Station daily.
As the first residential project in the area, it needs to set a
precedent for future residential projects. It should be a mix of
housing and other uses that provide amenities for all. We are
concerned that one 1760 S.F. retail space, and one community space
of 1250 S.F. is not enough. The gym shown in the ground floor
plan (pg. 3-30 of the PNF) has no access from the street and we
assume is for the use of the residents of the building only. The
1190 S.F. three bedroom apartment adjacent to the vestibule on the
ground floor could be an additional retail space or community
oriented space such as a daycare accessed from the street. Two
retail spaces rather than one, would support one another.
At the meeting on 9/29/14 it was stated that the three pocket
parks would be privately owned and maintained but open for public
use. This seems in conflict with the PNF. 3.6 Landscape Design,
p.3-4, states "the pocket parks are open to the residents and
visually
accessible to the public." We hope that the parks will be
open to the public.
We do not object to the size or height of the multi-family
apartment building at the corner of Ukraine Way and Hyde Park
Avenue. However, the massing of the building as currently
designed does not achieve the stated design objective stated in
the PNF 3.2, Massing p. 3-1. It reads as a large single block and
appears undifferentiated in relation to the rest of the project
and the surrounding urban fabric. The bay window on the corner
needs to be a stronger element that reads as more of a lantern.
The storefront glass at the base does not have enough doorways
into the public areas.
We applaud the projects mix of affordable and market rate
housing. We think the balance between public and private
amenities needs to be recalibrated with greater focus on the
retail and community spaces. The retail need not be an anchor
tenant such as Walgreens that requires visible parking. It could
be a more pedestrian focused locally owned business or community
space.
Throughout the public process of the Forest Hills Improvement
Initiative, the community was promised civic and community
improvements as a trade-off for increased density that would
benefit everyone living, shopping and passing through Forest Hills
Sincerely,
Nancy Shapero and Bill McIlroy, Shapero/McIlroy Design
landscape architect and architect/urban designer and Woodbourne
neighborhood residents