Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Cement carbon dioxide emissions quietly double in 20 years, CLAP! CLAP! CLIMATISTS! WAY TO GO!
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Nutless Buzz Lightyear
Dec 31, 2022, 1:55:02 AM12/31/22
to
In article <stcm1r$t42v$2...@news.freedyn.de>
<governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Democrats are stupid criminals.
Heat trapping carbon dioxide emissions from making cement, a
less talked about but major source of carbon pollution, have
doubled in the last 20 years, new global data shows.
In 2021, worldwide emissions from making cement for buildings,
roads and other infrastructure hit nearly 2.9 billion tons (2.6
billion metric tons) of carbon dioxide, which is more than 7% of
the global carbon emissions, according to emissions scientist
Robbie Andrew of Norway’s CICERO Center for International
Climate Research and the Global Carbon Project. Twenty years
ago, in 2002, cement emissions were some 1.4 billion tons (1.2
billion metric tons) of carbon dioxide.
Driven by China, global cement emissions globally have more than
tripled since 1992, recently growing at a rate of 2.6% a year.
It’s not just that more cement is being made and used. At a time
when all industries are supposed to be cleaning up their
processes, cement has actually been going in the opposite
direction. The carbon intensity of cement — how much pollution
is emitted per ton — has increased 9.3% from 2015 to 2020,
primarily because of China, according to the International
Energy Agency.
“Cement emission have grown faster than most other carbon
sources,” said Stanford University climate scientist Rob
Jackson, who leads Global Carbon Project, a group of scientists
that track worldwide climate pollution and publish their work in
peer reviewed journals. “Cement emissions were also unusual in
that they never dropped during COVID. They didn’t grow as much,
but they never declined the way oil, gas and coal did. Honestly,
I think it’s because the Chinese economy never really shut down
completely.”
Cement is unusual compared to other major materials, such as
steel, because not only does it require a lot of heat to make,
which causes emissions, but the chemical process of making
cement itself produces a lot of carbon dioxide, the major human-
caused long-term heat-trapping gas.
The recipe for cement requires lots of a key ingredient called
clinker, the crumbly binding agent in the entire mixture.
Clinker is made when limestone, calcium carbonate, is taken out
of the ground and heated to 2700 to 2800 degrees (1480 to 1540
degrees Celsius) to turn it into calcium oxide. But that process
strips carbon dioxide out of the limestone and it goes into the
air, Andrew said.
Rick Bohan, senior vice president for sustainability at the
industry group Portland Cement Association, said, “in the U.S.,
60% of our CO2 is a chemical fact of life... The reality is
concrete is a universal building material. There is no single
construction project that doesn’t use some amount of concrete in
it.”
Cement, which is the key ingredient in concrete, is in
buildings, roads and bridges.
“Each person on the planet is consuming on average more than a
kilogram (2.2 pounds) of cement per day,” said University of
California Earth systems scientist Steve Davis. “Obviously,
you’re not going to, you know, Home Depot and buying a sack of
cement every day. But on your behalf, the roads and buildings
and bridges out there are using more than a kilogram. And that’s
kind of mind boggling to me.”
Even though there are greener ways to make cement, cutting its
emissions dramatically is so difficult and requires such a
massive change in infrastructure and the way of doing business,
the International Energy Agency doesn’t envision the cement
industry getting to zero carbon emissions by 2050. Instead there
will still be emissions from cement, steel and aviation that
need to be balanced out with negative emissions elsewhere, said
IEA researchers Tiffany Voss and Peter Levi.
“These are hard, hard to cut,” Andrew said.
But industry’s Bohan said his group is certain that they can get
to net zero carbon emissions by 2050, if it gets help from
governments and especially cement users to accept and use green
cement properly. One of several ways to make greener cement is
to mix in fly ash, which is a waste product from burning coal,
in place of some of the clinker and he said there’s more than
enough fly ash available even with coal use reductions.
IEA’s Voss said the switch to green cement “is not there yet”
because of technology, infrastructure and other concerns. But
many in and outside the industry are working on the problem.
China is key because it produced more than half of the world’s
cement emissions in 2021, with India a distant second at about
9%, Andrew’s data shows. The United States spewed 2.5% of the
emissions from cement, ranking fifth behind Vietnam and Turkey.
“China is a huge country and its development ramped up,” Andrew
said. “It’s driven everything.”
China is not just making and using more cement, but the carbon
intensity has been going up a lot lately, IEA’s Voss said.
That’s because earlier in its development, China was using
cheaper, weaker low-clinker cement and buildings and bridges
were collapsing, so now the Chinese government is mandating
stronger cement, Norway’s Andrew said.
That’s a reasonable conservatism that slows efforts at making
greener cement, Davis said. People are not eager to try untested
cement recipes because “these are the structural materials of
our society,” he said.
For example, Portland limestone cement has 10% less emissions
but customers are so worried about strength they often say they
are only willing to use it if they use 10% more, industry’s
Bohan said.
Different cement uses have specific needs, such as strength
versus longevity but users often just want the strongest and
most durable when they don’t need it and this causes unnecessary
emissions, Bohan said.
And while people talk about curtailing flying, global aviation
emissions are less than half of that coming from concrete,
according to Global Carbon Project. There’s “flight shaming”
among scientists and activists, but no building shaming, Davis
said.
Cement as it ages does suck some carbon dioxide out of the air,
just like trees do, in small measurable, significant amounts,
Jackson said.
“Our primary focus needs to be on fossil fuel use because that’s
where most emissions come from,” Stanford’s Jackson said. “I
don’t think cement is on most policymakers’ radar.”
Perhaps not on most, but it is on some. California, Colorado,
New Jersey and New York have all passed legislation on cleaner
concrete and the trend is growing.
https://apnews.com/article/climate-science-china-pollution-
3d97642acbb07fca7540edca38448266
<governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Democrats are stupid criminals.
Heat trapping carbon dioxide emissions from making cement, a
less talked about but major source of carbon pollution, have
doubled in the last 20 years, new global data shows.
In 2021, worldwide emissions from making cement for buildings,
roads and other infrastructure hit nearly 2.9 billion tons (2.6
billion metric tons) of carbon dioxide, which is more than 7% of
the global carbon emissions, according to emissions scientist
Robbie Andrew of Norway’s CICERO Center for International
Climate Research and the Global Carbon Project. Twenty years
ago, in 2002, cement emissions were some 1.4 billion tons (1.2
billion metric tons) of carbon dioxide.
Driven by China, global cement emissions globally have more than
tripled since 1992, recently growing at a rate of 2.6% a year.
It’s not just that more cement is being made and used. At a time
when all industries are supposed to be cleaning up their
processes, cement has actually been going in the opposite
direction. The carbon intensity of cement — how much pollution
is emitted per ton — has increased 9.3% from 2015 to 2020,
primarily because of China, according to the International
Energy Agency.
“Cement emission have grown faster than most other carbon
sources,” said Stanford University climate scientist Rob
Jackson, who leads Global Carbon Project, a group of scientists
that track worldwide climate pollution and publish their work in
peer reviewed journals. “Cement emissions were also unusual in
that they never dropped during COVID. They didn’t grow as much,
but they never declined the way oil, gas and coal did. Honestly,
I think it’s because the Chinese economy never really shut down
completely.”
Cement is unusual compared to other major materials, such as
steel, because not only does it require a lot of heat to make,
which causes emissions, but the chemical process of making
cement itself produces a lot of carbon dioxide, the major human-
caused long-term heat-trapping gas.
The recipe for cement requires lots of a key ingredient called
clinker, the crumbly binding agent in the entire mixture.
Clinker is made when limestone, calcium carbonate, is taken out
of the ground and heated to 2700 to 2800 degrees (1480 to 1540
degrees Celsius) to turn it into calcium oxide. But that process
strips carbon dioxide out of the limestone and it goes into the
air, Andrew said.
Rick Bohan, senior vice president for sustainability at the
industry group Portland Cement Association, said, “in the U.S.,
60% of our CO2 is a chemical fact of life... The reality is
concrete is a universal building material. There is no single
construction project that doesn’t use some amount of concrete in
it.”
Cement, which is the key ingredient in concrete, is in
buildings, roads and bridges.
“Each person on the planet is consuming on average more than a
kilogram (2.2 pounds) of cement per day,” said University of
California Earth systems scientist Steve Davis. “Obviously,
you’re not going to, you know, Home Depot and buying a sack of
cement every day. But on your behalf, the roads and buildings
and bridges out there are using more than a kilogram. And that’s
kind of mind boggling to me.”
Even though there are greener ways to make cement, cutting its
emissions dramatically is so difficult and requires such a
massive change in infrastructure and the way of doing business,
the International Energy Agency doesn’t envision the cement
industry getting to zero carbon emissions by 2050. Instead there
will still be emissions from cement, steel and aviation that
need to be balanced out with negative emissions elsewhere, said
IEA researchers Tiffany Voss and Peter Levi.
“These are hard, hard to cut,” Andrew said.
But industry’s Bohan said his group is certain that they can get
to net zero carbon emissions by 2050, if it gets help from
governments and especially cement users to accept and use green
cement properly. One of several ways to make greener cement is
to mix in fly ash, which is a waste product from burning coal,
in place of some of the clinker and he said there’s more than
enough fly ash available even with coal use reductions.
IEA’s Voss said the switch to green cement “is not there yet”
because of technology, infrastructure and other concerns. But
many in and outside the industry are working on the problem.
China is key because it produced more than half of the world’s
cement emissions in 2021, with India a distant second at about
9%, Andrew’s data shows. The United States spewed 2.5% of the
emissions from cement, ranking fifth behind Vietnam and Turkey.
“China is a huge country and its development ramped up,” Andrew
said. “It’s driven everything.”
China is not just making and using more cement, but the carbon
intensity has been going up a lot lately, IEA’s Voss said.
That’s because earlier in its development, China was using
cheaper, weaker low-clinker cement and buildings and bridges
were collapsing, so now the Chinese government is mandating
stronger cement, Norway’s Andrew said.
That’s a reasonable conservatism that slows efforts at making
greener cement, Davis said. People are not eager to try untested
cement recipes because “these are the structural materials of
our society,” he said.
For example, Portland limestone cement has 10% less emissions
but customers are so worried about strength they often say they
are only willing to use it if they use 10% more, industry’s
Bohan said.
Different cement uses have specific needs, such as strength
versus longevity but users often just want the strongest and
most durable when they don’t need it and this causes unnecessary
emissions, Bohan said.
And while people talk about curtailing flying, global aviation
emissions are less than half of that coming from concrete,
according to Global Carbon Project. There’s “flight shaming”
among scientists and activists, but no building shaming, Davis
said.
Cement as it ages does suck some carbon dioxide out of the air,
just like trees do, in small measurable, significant amounts,
Jackson said.
“Our primary focus needs to be on fossil fuel use because that’s
where most emissions come from,” Stanford’s Jackson said. “I
don’t think cement is on most policymakers’ radar.”
Perhaps not on most, but it is on some. California, Colorado,
New Jersey and New York have all passed legislation on cleaner
concrete and the trend is growing.
https://apnews.com/article/climate-science-china-pollution-
3d97642acbb07fca7540edca38448266
0 new messages