NREGA Article by Aruna Roy & Nikhil Dey (Peace Mumbai)

10 views
Skip to first unread message

Lysa John

unread,
Jun 22, 2009, 4:54:33 AM6/22/09
to wn...@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================

TOPIC: Aruna Roy and Nikhil Dey Survey and Explore NREGA

http://groups.google.co.in/group/peace-mumbai/t/60a214815be82a4d?hl=en

==============================================================================

 

== 1 of 1 ==

Date: Sun, Jun 21 2009 9:58 pm

From: Sukla Sen 

 

http://www.hinduonnet.com/mag/2009/06/21/stories/2009062150010100.htm

 

*NREGA: Breaking new ground*

 

ARUNA ROY AND NIKHIL DEY

 

The NREGA, the flagship programme of the UPA government, was revolutionary

in its promise of inclusive growth, the right to work and the dignity of

labour and a rational, participatory relationship with the State. And it has

mostly delivered...

 

Suddenly the NREGA has become a buzz word. It stands vindicated by the

mandate of the people in its most basic evaluation in a democracy -- the

general elections. Basking in the glory and security of post-electoral

analysis, it is actually the b est time for those who support the basic

philosophy of the NREGA to focus on what it has done and what it has not, by

its own parameters.

 

The first and the primary focus should be to examine its impact on the human

resource base of rural India. Has it energised, mobilised, empowered, and

delivered to India's poorest and most marginalised rural people? Secondly,

has it provided those who were "not shining" a measure of dignity, tangible

economic benefit, and a motivation to participate in local action? This is

the crux, for, something as vast and ambitious as the NREGA can only succeed

in bringing about change if millions of workers become its true advocates

and monitors.

 

Let us begin with the most persistent charges of endemic corruption.

Notwithstanding negative propaganda and the prominent reportage of

corruption, NREGA stands apart from employment and poverty alleviation

programmes in significant ways. It is the first national programme of

consequence which has woven transparency and accountability into the mundane

fabric of daily interaction of people with government. The cases of reported

corruption have shocked the intelligentsia. The rural worker might often be

the victim but will still offer critical support, not only because it has

provided wage income, but also for facilitating disclosure, which helps

identify and fight pilferage. In fact, in many cases, scams have been

exposed by the workers themselves. NREGA gives an opportunity to break the

feudally enforced silence of its victims. Through transparency and social

audit measures, it allows anyone, anywhere to be part of the monitoring of

the delivery system. The other programmes appear to be clean only because no

one knows what goes on! The NREGA gives a further opportunity to realise the

Constitutional sovereignty, the power of the people. What the political

establishment would do well to understand is that the vote was not a blind

endorsement, but the expression of a fragile hope of a rational

participatory relationship with the government.

New claims

 

The NREGA has opened up a unique legal space for the poor, with a

consequent, legally-mandated obligation on the administration to deliver. In

fact, implementation rests on the simple philosophy that ordinary people

will go to great lengths to procure their entitlements, given the space to

do so. Apart from systemic corruption, we are all aware of the chronic

inefficiency, unwillingness and incapacities of the bureaucratic system to

deliver entitlements for the poor. The persistent argument was that in this

context implementation would be impossible. The NREGA sought to create real

opportunities and legal spaces, with the belief that people will begin to

push to overcome bureaucratic and political resistance. The electoral

endorsement over, it is a good time to begin to examine this aspect of

bottom-up implementation. Does the rights-based approach really work?

 

The Act has a number of "trigger mechanisms" designed to activate and

establish people's entitlements. One such trigger is the right to have a Job

Card. The Act mandates that anyone who applies at their Panchayat for a Job

Card must be given one within 15 days. Without a Job Card, people cannot

even apply for work, nor corroborate the records. It is a "license" and "pan

card" of the wage worker's family, with a record of days of work and wages

received during the year. There are many States where large numbers of

people have demanded, but not received, Job Cards. In many Panchayats, the

Job Cards are in the control of implementing agencies. Publicising the Job

Card as a record of individual entitlements, to be updated by the

authorities, and kept in possession of the workers, would ensure the NREGA

is monitored by its workers.

Crucial accountability

 

The application for work and the dated receipt are crucial to trigger the

demand for work. The receipt is also the basic record for claiming

unemployment allowance if the work is not provided within 15 days. States

like Rajasthan have fared well in providing Job Cards, and providing work

within 15 days, but resistance to giving dated receipts has become a massive

problem. No State has effectively activated this important mechanism.

Nevertheless, it has worked when workers groups have got organised.

 

In the 30 years of existence of its precursor, the Maharashtra Employment

Guarantee Act, there is no recorded instance of payment of unemployment

allowance. The NREGA has already recorded payment of unemployment allowance

to large numbers of workers in chronically poorly-administered areas. The

successful people's struggles for the payment of unemployment allowance -- in

Barwani District of Madhya Pradesh, Raichur of Karnataka, Bolangir,

Navrangpur and Kalahandi of Orissa, Latehar in Jharkhand, Sitapur District

of UP -- has been a breakthrough in accountability, and an inspiration to

other workers struggling for entitlements. The payment of unemployment

allowance emanates from an administrative lapse, and is eventually deducted

from the pocket of erring officials. It is not a freebie doled out of the

government exchequer. Like the Right to Information Act, this has created an

important mechanism for enforcing the right while holding the bureaucracy

accountable.

 

The wage under NREGA has been another trigger and indicator of its success.

The wage rate, the measurement system, and the timely payment of wages have

all become part of the entitlement package. Thanks to NREGA, minimum wages

have, for the first time, become a real factor in determining the lower

limit for market wages. There are many ongoing struggles for the payment of

minimum wages; and adopting a transparent measurement system for every

work-site is a management challenge that has thrown up many grassroots

solutions.

Bottlenecks

 

Wage payments through NREGA have initiated the biggest "financial inclusion"

drive, with the requirement that all wage payments be made through banks and

post offices. The engineers, the accountants, and the post offices have been

unable to cope, and late payments have begun to cripple the Act. Students

and Academics, working together with workers' organisations in Khunti

District in Jharkhand, have operationalised the entitlement in the NREGA to

get Rs. 2,000/- per worker paid to over 300 workers as compensation for

delayed payment under the provisions of the Payment of Wages Act. The Khunti

payment, made last month, has once again demonstrated that the solution to

the vexatious issue of late payments lies in the entitlement framework.

 

The uneven implementation in different States has shown that where people's

struggles have gained political and administrative respect, the NREGA has

shown tangible results on a massive scale. It is that battleground of

struggle that could well determine the future of the political discourse in

this country.

 

The Government of India has transferred adequate money to the States and

Districts to make timely wage payments. Shri C.P. Joshi, the current Union

Minister for Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, was reported to have

talked about his party prospects in the polls being negatively affected

because of late wage payments in Rajasthan. As Union Minister now, if he

were to exercise his administrative and political will to ensure

compensation is paid to those receiving delayed wage payments, the lethargic

bureaucratic system will find a way to respond. Chronic delays in wage

payments during the drought in Rajasthan became a political issue, and the

delays were wiped out. Innovations and mechanisms respond to a bottom-up

demand, but do so best when the political establishment puts pressure.

 

The NREGA also assures an adequate, realistic provision for administrative

expenses. At the current six per cent of total costs which has been allowed

for administrative costs, there is no legitimacy in citing a shortage of

staff or resources for bureaucratic delay. In Rajasthan, for instance, the

over 7,000 crores spent on NREGA last year amounts to a massive Rs. 450

crores available for administrative expenses per year. This kind of money

and resources can, in fact, help gram Panchayats become properly resourced

to better carry out their overall responsibilities. It can also help ensure

that there is no excuse for the failure to carry out all transparency

measures and put an effective grievance redressal mechanism in place.

Biggest contribution

 

Transparency and accountability to the poorest and the weakest is in fact

the biggest potential contribution of the NREGA to the entire governance

system. The NREGA is an outstanding example of how the RTI Act can be woven

into the fabric of the delivery system and the whole legal and governance

paradigm. The entire expenditure on works and workers -- 94 per cent of the

total amount -- is required to be put on the website of the NREGA, with every

transaction revealed in detail. This can easily be increased to 100 per

cent. Using this Management Information System (MIS), Vijaypura Gram

Panchayat in Rajsamand District has begun to build a Janata Information

System (JIS) painted on the walls of government buildings in the Gram

Panchayat. The boards reveal the details of the number of days of work

provided and payments made in the year to every Job Card holder in the

Panchayat. Also painted on the walls are the list of works sanctioned, the

expenditure on labour and material, and item-wise expenditure on material in

each work in the Panchayat, including exactly how many bags of cement, sand

and trolleys of stone were procured, and at what rate in the Gram Panchayat.

This is like a web wall which reveals to every interested visitor all that

they want to examine.

 

What can be done in one Panchayat can be carried out in the 9,189 Panchayats

of Rajasthan, and the hundreds of thousands of Panchayats in India. The

walls in Vijaypura Panchayat provide details of 976 families given

employment in 2008-09, where two thirds have completed 100 days, with an

expenditure of 91 lakhs. The Sarpanch is a Dalit youth from a poor family,

elected in a general seat, and the Panchayat is proof of how well an

Employment Guarantee programme can be implemented, in terms of people's

entitlements, transparency measures, worksite management, and many other

innovations.

Larger impact

 

If the millions of financial transactions of the NREGA can go on their web

site, there can be no justification for not following the example and

putting almost every financial transaction of government -- receipt or

expenditure -- on the web sites of the relevant department or agency.

Proactive disclosure is a requirement of the RTI Act, and is a good example

of the larger potential impact of the NREGA on governance.

 

The NREGA is India's first law to codify development rights in a legal

framework, and like the RTI, it has begun to set an example in a global

context. Apart from the law, and a set of guidelines, there is a strong and

immediate need to formulate rules to operationalise provisions in the Act;

which includes guaranteeing grievance redressal in seven days, social audit

twice a year, and mandatory transparency and proactive disclosure. Properly

incorporated and enforced, a comprehensive set of operational rules could

strengthen the entitlement framework, fixing responsibility at every level.

Once again, it would enable bottom-up pressure for implementation, which

should be matched by a strong political mandate. Today, the NREGA has

millions of workers' unresolved and un-addressed grievances and problems to

be dealt with. A response system could not only radically improve the NREGA,

but can impact and transform the whole face of rural governance.

 

Is the NREGA an administrator's nightmare or a redistribution of income and

power? A social safety net or a step towards the right to work, to prevent

migration, and even boost local market economies? For those who cannot think

beyond the pale of the free market economy and the business model manager,

it is indeed a nightmare. For years, simplistic management solutions to

poverty, with the poor as an input to be managed, have failed. We cannot see

ordinary people as active participants and empowered citizens. That is why

there is difficulty in understanding the practice and logic of democracy and

difficult, therefore, to understand the realistic detailing and complexity

of an Employment Guarantee initiative.

Inclusive growth

 

Independent India has to acknowledge the critical role the NREGA has played

in providing a measure of inclusive growth. It has given people a right to

work, to re-establish the dignity of labour, to ensure people's economic and

democratic rights and entitlements, to create labour intensive

infrastructure and assets, and to build the human resource base of our

country. For the first time, the power elite recognises the people's right

to fight endemic hunger and poverty with dignity, accepting that their

labour will be the foundation for infrastructure and economic growth. The

entitlements paradigm is still to be established in many States in the

country. Second generation issues like the expansion of the categories of

permissible works needs to be taken up with labour and the deprived

continuing to be the central focus. The improvements must be to strengthen,

not divert from these basic tenets. In the midst of the current economic

slowdown, there is enough evidence that this kind of commitment can work to

help reduce the slowdown.

 

The political class would do well to understand that the most important

solution is an assertion of its will to respond to people's voices. The many

wise, creative, and innovative initiatives emerging from theory and practice

have a future only if they are owned by the people and implemented with

justice. The NREGA can give people an opportunity to make the entire system

truly transparent and accountable. Properly supported, people's struggles

for basic entitlements can, in turn, become the strongest political

initiative to strengthen our democratic fabric.

 

*Aruna Roy and Nikhil Dey are activists with the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti

Sangathan (MKSS). Email: arun...@gmail.com, nikh...@gmail.com.*

 

 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Wada Na Todo Abhiyan

C-1/E, 2nd Floor, Green Park Extension

New Delhi 110 001 INDIA

Tel: 91-11-46082371 to 74; Fax: 46082372

in...@wadanatodo.net / www.wadanatodo.net

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages