Follow-up Question Regarding the License of System Outputs

[Keito Kudo]

Hi,

Thank you for your previous reply, Philipp.
Because I couldn’t get my message to post properly for some reason, I’m asking again in this new thread.

> we do not enforce any official formal license but we expect that the translations can be openly shared and used for follow-up research purposes.


If it does not hinder follow-up research, would it be acceptable for each team to specify its own license for its system output (e.g., in the system-description paper)?

The open LLM our team intends to use imposes no restrictions on academic research, but it does require that any model trained on its generated content inherit part of the original model’s name.


Best regards,

Keito Kudo