[dev] Re: you guys' work promote my mental health

[syl...@saboua.me]

Sorry guys, *correct link about my personal journey with UNIX-like
systems : https://www.saboua.xyz/BSD.html
That's what it is to be compulsive.

On 2025-03-27 10:26, syl...@saboua.me wrote:
> Over the last decade I have been diagnosed with a panel of disorders
> ranging in the psychotic/schizotypal variety – although I know that
> these stem from CPTSD (new addition to the 11-CIM) – as well as more
> recently “anankastic” personality.
>
> Since before then I've been mesmerized by the display and aims of the
> openbsd project. Such sleekness ! Only to discover that the devs goes
> so far as to design it such as that everything one needs is contained
> within the goldsmithery of mandoc ...
>
> The same sentiment captured me when I stumbled upon suckless'. What a
> gallon of fresh air ! Totally stands out from what I gathered elsewhere
> up to now.
>
> I'm not a proficient programmer yet – theory is easy, practice is hard.
> But I wish some day I reach the level where I can contribute.
>
> That's all. You may read more about my personal journey :
> https://www.saboua.xyz/UNIX.html
>
> Sylvain Saboua

[syl...@saboua.me]

[Feodor]

syl...@saboua.me писал(а) 2025.03.27 12:26:

Did you try CRUX?

[syl...@saboua.me]

I've heard of it but there's few chances I'd ever come back from
(Open)BSD to Linux.
See the playlist referenced in my blogpost as per one of the reasons
why:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EJEUYUPtNWA&list=PLdArachVKgnZ4-RPot9EbKBdyR4qtzIOo&index=4

[syl...@saboua.me]

On 2025-03-27 12:32, Feodor wrote:

[syl...@saboua.me]

On 2025-03-28 07:01, justina colmena ~biz wrote:
> On Thursday, March 27, 2025 8:51:35 AM Pacific Daylight Time izzy Meyer
> wrote:
>> Curious why you chose to invalidate this person's experience that they
>> made themselves vulnerable about. Sure- you have your views on things,
>> and that's totally cool. But maybe try being a bit more forgiving of
>> someone who, again, made themselves vulnerable next time?
> People serve process with mental health allegations that sticks worse
> than a
> felony record in court for the rest of a person's life, and they want
> others
> to be forgiving of them?
>
Oh ! I think I get you. I had the impression that you were sympathetic
to
antipsychiatry, especially given the related posts on your blog. I'm
still
not very sure but ... I've never been charged for anything criminal or
against
the law, you're making quite a broad generalization here.
When talking about mental illness and the aforementioned soothing I get
from
obsd and suckless, I was alluding to the relative cognitive overload
undeliberately enforced by other projects which seems mostly absent from
these
two – as hinted at in the title of my page UNIX.html @saboua.xyz

> Mental health services, like those of astrologers or magicians,
> psychics,
> tarot card readers, palmists, have gained far too much of a sheen of
> legitimacy (or color of law, as it were) in court for service of
> process and
> summons to appear -- Say does a person really have an organic "mental
> illness"
> of known etiology? Or is it simply a case of simulated legal process
> with a
> catch-all diagnosis to make a person appear "formally mad" in a court
> of law
> for some other legal summons?
>
That's right. A lot of diagnoses are abusive, esp. when considering the
prevalent
traumatic liminal state that pervades among our relatives within
society. But as
for me I attribute this to Big Pharma's lucrative motive, not legal
summons which
I've seen cases of while at the ward.

> Absolutely no morality is inherent in the "law" just because it's the
> law.
Precisely. Legal is not necessarily moral.

Sylvain Saboua

[Sylvain Saboua]

Oh, I see ! You're from the “Common Law v Maritime Law,” “Free Man on
the Land” [1] bunch. I've enjoyed this conspiracy theory a lot, in
France we had the “je ne contracte pas” [2] stemming from it just last
year. But French law stems from Napoleonic Civil Code, i.e. continental
law, which is ; little to do with Common Law... Anyways.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeman_on_the_land_movement
[2] https://www.youtube.com/clip/UgkxWnBY9qjby4Uw71PwEZ3EvFhlKiWRqkB9

In the end, I believe this all stems from the misplaced free association
thought (or misplaced “right brain” more or less). As somebody else
says, “I stopped nurturing any interest in Ancap/Libertarianism when I
realized it is but yet another neuroatypy.”

Enjoy

On 2025-03-28 14:58, justina colmena ~biz wrote:
> The shrinks got too litigious, and "mental health" is practiced as a
> branch of "law" alongside "intellectual property" and other matters
> that are either "imaginary" or "all in your head" ...
>
> There are laws against "simulating legal process" over such imaginary
> matters etc.
> <https://law.justia.com/codes/alaska/title-11/chapter-56/article-4/section-11-56-620/>
> but such laws are never enforced, because even without a Constitution
> the law itself can't be illegal in a court of law, and even if it
> were, the attorneys can't prosecute themselves or else they'd put
> themselves out of business for their own practices.
>
> The "law" itself by definition being whatever "lawyers" keep
> themselves in business practicing and billing for. Unless you think
> you can be successful in court as yet another crackpot mentally ill
> "pro se" petitioner with a flat tire or another speeding ticket or
> traffic violation on the way to court you must answer, with paying off
> all your parking tickets and getting your vehicle released from city
> hall impound after court, but your own petitions are just going to be
> professionally dismissed for failure to appear at any one of those
> numerous perfunctory court hearings for filing a suit. Cops have
> grappling hooks and shoot-out axle nets to physically disable and stop
> your vehicle on the road now. That's why the real pro lawyers always
> hail a cab or take Uber or Lyft to court because you can't even
> consider driving or parking your own vehicle in a hostile red-light
> district.

--
Sylvain Saboua