Hello, Kal:
Apologies for the late response. I have had some personal laptop issues this week and have been unable to respond until just now.
Regarding 1: I believe you are correct. My quick reexamination of the relevant code agrees with your assessment.
Regarding 2: Yes, WinFsp performs the calculation completely internally. It does not consult the AD.
Bill
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WinFsp" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
winfsp+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/winfsp/84f458b0-13fc-42b0-a9b0-2c9ce7513643%40googlegroups.com.
Regarding 1: I believe you are correct. My quick reexamination of the relevant code agrees with your assessment.
Regarding 2: Yes, WinFsp performs the calculation completely internally. It does not consult the AD.
Regarding 2: Yes, WinFsp performs the calculation completely internally. It does not consult the AD.
I was afraid of that. Any chance that WinFSP might support Posix attributes from AD in the future?
I think what you are describing is non-trivial, but it certainly sounds like a use case worth supporting it. Please consider opening an issue in the WinFsp GitHub repository to track it.
Bill
I think what you are describing is non-trivial, but it certainly sounds like a use case worth supporting it. Please consider opening an issue in the WinFsp GitHub repository to track it.