Key qn for Children Chi Analysis

[Stephanie A. Chuah]

Hi Team,

(You might need to refer to the survey) So, there are 107 respondents who clicked on a children's age group,which can be done by mistake, and there's no way to unclick it. But only 50 people indicated in the text box how many children specifically.

You can't screen by age and marital status, because they could be referring to a sibling, so we're going to have to make an assumption:

Option 1

Assume that all who clicked on an age category has at least 1 child in their household of that age.

Option 2

Assume that only people who entered the number of children in the text box actually have children in their household.

If we take Option 2, it means we only have a data set of 50, which would be a little weak, especially when we have to split them up according to different variables etc. But Option 1 makes a strong assumption that all these people (>50) just didn't make a mistake.

Please let me know what you think and I'll be able to continue this particular analysis.

-Steph

--
Stephanie A. Chuah
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
stephani...@gmail.com |  +1 (215) 919-1574

[Maryam Mir]

I am segmenting age like this:

teenager

20-30

31-50

51-70

71-90

Is that ok?

--
 
 

[Maryam Mir]

Also do you guys remember the name of the guest speaker?! I can't remember his name…

From: "Stephanie A. Chuah" <stephani...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: <windows-...@googlegroups.com>
Date: Thursday, November 22, 2012 1:18 PM
To: "windows-...@googlegroups.com" <windows-...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Key qn for Children Chi Analysis

--
 
 

[Duaa Abu Hijleh]

It's Rob Britton

> --
>  
>  
>

[Jannel Alston]

Maryam is it okay if I say the first two groups (teenager, 20-30) are young, 31-50 is middle and 51-70, 71-90 are old?

--
 
 

[Jannel Alston]

I lied, I just looked and we have not even 5 people who fit the last category. For ease of calculation  the first two groups will be young, and the second two old. You can still split them up by numerical age for your analysis though. Is this okay?

[Maryam Mir]

So for my analysis- should I do just young and old or split them the way I had? Also, are we meeting tomorrow? If not, could we meet for a long period (2 hours perhaps) on Wednesday to try and do as much as we can and start on the presentation

--
 
 

[Stephanie A. Chuah]

I have a midterm on Thursday and would prefer not meeting for a long time on Wednesday.

Jannel, Joseph and myself will be available to meet at 8pm or 10pm tomorrow. Anyone else?

-Steph

--
 
 

[Duaa Abu Hijleh]

I think we should meet tomorrow. I should be free at 8 and after or a bit earlier even. We should not put this off! :)

On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Maryam Mir <maryam...@gmail.com> wrote:

--
 
 

[Manisha Taneja]

same, i have a final and a quiz on thurs so wed is not ideal for me. im free at 8!

--
 
 

[Maryam Mir]

10pm works for me

--
 
 

[Duaa Abu Hijleh]

Yeah, I am also going to get busier at the end of the week.

[Maryam Mir]

Ah ok sorry then sometime on the weekend we should meet for a longer period..I have a management meeting from 8-10pm tomorrow so anytime before or after

From: Manisha Taneja <m.tan...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: <windows-...@googlegroups.com>

--
 
 

[Duaa Abu Hijleh]

I can do 10 then, I am not sure I can meet before 8.

--
 
 

[Joseph Smithey]

Let’s do 10pm

--
 
 

[Stephanie A. Chuah]

I have G66 from 10-11.30pm for Monday.

-Steph

--