Re: Digest for windowlicker-users@googlegroups.com - 3 Messages in 1 Topic

[Toby]

Hey folks,

I'm still interested in the SWT port (see ancient upload to the group)... Is it worth splitting the project into more explicit modules like this? Selfishly, I was thinking I could port just the swing module over to SWT... 

Cheers,

Toby

On 26 May 2010, at 16:48, windowlicker-...@googlegroups.com wrote:

email to windowlic...@googlegroups.com.

[Nat Pryce]

Hi. Windowlicker is currently split into modules: core, web, swing. Adding an swt module would be cool!

--Nat

www.natpryce.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "windowlicker-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to windowlic...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to windowlicker-us...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/windowlicker-users?hl=en.

[Toby]

awesome! I just have to finish the time machine then its on ;)

On 26 May, 18:27, Nat Pryce <nat.pr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi. Windowlicker is currently split into modules: core, web, swing.  
> Adding an swt module would be cool!
>
> --Nat
>
> www.natpryce.com
>

> On 26 May 2010, at 17:26, Toby <toby.wes...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
>
> > I'm still interested in the SWT port (see ancient upload to the  
> > group)... Is it worth splitting the project into more explicit  
> > modules like this? Selfishly, I was thinking I could port just the  
> > swing module over to SWT...
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Toby
>

> > On 26 May 2010, at 16:48, windowlicker-users