Add natives for ARM64 to Wildfly distro

[Julien Faye]

Hello Wildfly devs, 

Sorry for cross-posting but I didn't receive any answer at https://lists.jboss.org/archives/list/wildf...@lists.jboss.org/thread/J5KD3HOETVYLRTSA23CCM7K3RL7BZ4ZX/

At my job we want to move to Linux ARM64 machines for our deployments. 

The issue we see is that the current (22.0.1) distribution does not include native binaries for linux-aarch64 architecture :-/ 

 $ find ./ -name "*.so" ./modules/system/layers/base/org/apache/activemq/artemis/journal/main/lib/linux-i686/libartemis-native-32.so ./modules/system/layers/base/org/apache/activemq/artemis/journal/main/lib/linux-x86_64/libartemis-native-64.so ./modules/system/layers/base/org/wildfly/openssl/main/lib/linux-x86_64/libwfssl.so ./modules/system/layers/base/org/wildfly/openssl/main/lib/linux-s390x/libwfssl.so 

I've found https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFLY-13302 (and https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFSSL-32 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-2705) but those are opened almost an year ago and it is not clear whether they will be resolved any time soon. As far as I understand your recommendation is to build the binaries locally. This is OK but it adds some extra complexity to the deployment and upgrade processes. 

Since ARM64 becomes more and more popular for server side deployments I would like to ask you whether those tickets could be resolved in near future ? 

Thank you! 

Regards, 

Julien

[Martin Grigorov]

Hi Julien,

Thank you for bringing this topic up!

Unfortunatelly so far there is no progress on these tickets :-/

Martin

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WildFly" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wildfly+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/wildfly/bbe957c5-ddfb-425e-b90d-20bb77e72466n%40googlegroups.com.