The last time this occured was in 1933
∅baMa∅ Tse Dung
HEIL HITLER! - get used to it, Liberal Fascists!
panjandrum
message
news:f3c26372-2a63-4fca...@d4g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
> 0baMa0's Reichskulturkammer
>
> http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pcourrielche/2009/09/21/explosive-new-audio-reveals-white-house-using-nea-to-push-partisan-agenda/
>
> HEIL HITLER! - get used to it, Liberal Fascists!
What keeps your head from caving in?
N∅ ∅baMa∅
HEIL HITLER!
vtc
Sorry but it was your hero Bush along with Rumsfeld that started a
Blitzkrieg in Iraq based on a lie in which they had an affinity for
using German world war 2 operational names for all of their campaigns.
It was Cheney that blended corporation & state into a war & taxpayer
fleecing machine that operated outside the bounds of the Geneva
Conventions & outside of the guidelines of the U.S. military.
Quit trying to blame the disaster that the GOP created on the new president.
PC
> ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung wrote:
> > 0baMa0's Reichskulturkammer
>
>
> > HEIL HITLER! - get used to it, Liberal Fascists!
>
> Sorry but it was your hero Bush along with Rumsfeld that started a
> Blitzkrieg in Iraq based on a lie in which they had an affinity for
> using German world war 2 operational names for all of their campaigns.
> It was Cheney that blended corporation & state into a war & taxpayer
> fleecing machine that operated outside the bounds of the Geneva
> Conventions & outside of the guidelines of the U.S. military.
>
> Quit trying to blame the disaster that the GOP created on the new president.
That would require an attention span longer than two weeks. This guy
is simply a moron.
panjandrum
news:291d3e48-5a53-4da8...@j9g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
This guy would have to wise up to be a moron.
If you believe in God, believe it was created for a reason,
inscrutable as it may be.
Nunya Bidnits
> "?baMa? Tse Dung" <0bama0....@gmail.com> wrote in
>>
>> HEIL HITLER! - get used to it, Liberal Fascists!
>
>
>
> What keeps your head from caving in?
Hot air pressure.
Liberals will be the first to go
news:ZOSdneK_EsjSkiXX...@posted.widowmaker:
How soon ignorant liberals forget and stick their heads up their asses
again.
http://www.cnn.com/US/9812/16/clinton.iraq.speech/
"Earlier today I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and
security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces," Clinton
said.
"Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological
weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors,"
said Clinton.
Others:
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the
U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if
appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond
effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of
mass destruction programs." -- From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman,
Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among
others on October 9, 1998
"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last
visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has
reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological,
chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf
War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and
is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-
range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies." --
From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold
Ford, & Tom Lantos among others
"Whereas Iraq has consistently breached its cease-fire agreement between
Iraq and the United States, entered into on March 3, 1991, by failing to
dismantle its weapons of mass destruction program, and refusing to permit
monitoring and verification by United Nations inspections; Whereas Iraq
has developed weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and
biological capabilities, and has made positive progress toward developing
nuclear weapons capabilities" -- From a joint resolution submitted by Tom
Harkin and Arlen Specter on July 18, 2002
"Saddam's goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while
retaining and enhancing Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. We
cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed." -- Madeline
Albright, 1998
"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some
day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10
times since 1983" -- National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998
"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all
weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to
its agreement." -- Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence
reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet
achieved nuclear capability." -- Robert Byrd, October 2002
"There's no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat... Yes, he has
chemical and biological weapons. He's had those for a long time. But the
United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than
we were before September 11th of 2001... He is, as far as we know,
actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn't have nuclear
warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends
in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we." -- Wesley
Clark on September 26, 2002
"What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents
with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad's regime did use such
weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that,
over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this
country has continued armament programs." -- Jacques Chirac, October 16,
2002
"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat
Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to
use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today,
Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened
tomorrow." -- Bill Clinton in 1998
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show
that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological
weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al
Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement
in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that
if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity
to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop
nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the
political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all
too well affects American security." -- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002
"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in
1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into
a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those
trucks out." -- Clinton's Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of
2003
"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass
destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them
against his own people." -- Tom Daschle in 1998
"Saddam Hussein's regime represents a grave threat to America and our
allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades,
Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every
available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He
has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is
trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build
nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving
that goal." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002
"The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national
security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress
to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its
determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq's weapons of mass
destruction." -- John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002
"I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons
of mass destruction." -- Dick Gephardt in September of 2002
"Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and
we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to
weapons of mass destruction. Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction
has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it
will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." -- Al Gore, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." -
- Bob Graham, December 2002
"Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to
deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction." --
Jim Jeffords, October 8, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction." -- Ted Kennedy, September 27,
2002
"There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein's regime is a serious danger, that
he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction
cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed." -- Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002
"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority
to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe
that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a
real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 2002
"The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real,
but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that
war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert
Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build
those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these
weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had
on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation." -- John
Kerry, October 9, 2002
"(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator,
leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He
presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently
prone to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America�s
response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of
mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations
Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose
its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with
weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with
us since the end of the Persian Gulf War." -- John Kerry, Jan 23, 2003
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction
and the means of delivering them." -- Carl Levin, Sept 19, 2002
"Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological
weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the
United States." -- Joe Lieberman, August, 2002
"Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and
biological weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq's denials, U.N.
inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities
that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate
that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is
no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively
pursued biological and chemical weapons.U.N. inspectors have said that
Iraq's claims about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable.
In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its
own Kurdish population. While weapons inspections have been successful in
the past, there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can
be no doubt that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining
weapons of mass destruction." -- Patty Murray, October 9, 2002
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that
the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave
importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the
development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to
countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons
inspection process." -- Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998
"Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible
intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq
still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium
perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and
ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing
these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly
toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent
is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And
Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be
used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production." --
Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998
"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can
obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources -- something that
is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we
have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of
weapons of mass destruction." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002
"Saddam�s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a
very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before,
both against Iraq�s enemies and against his own people. He is working to
develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that
could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities
in the Middle East." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002
"Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration�s policy towards
Iraq, I don�t think there can be any question about Saddam�s conduct. He
has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of
international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying
time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United
Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are
simply the facts." -- Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002
grinder
"?baMa? Tse Dung" <0bama0....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f3c26372-2a63-4fca...@d4g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
> 0baMa0's Reichskulturkammer
>
> http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pcourrielche/2009/09/21/explosive-new-audio-reveals-white-house-using-nea-to-push-partisan-agenda/
>
> HEIL HITLER! - get used to it, Liberal Fascists!
Probably has not occurred to you that posting this crap in a sports
newsgroup will not help your cause. So by all means continue.
panjandrum
message news:Xns9C8E769CA9AC7CRZA3@localhost...
> very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical
> weapons before,
> develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial
> vehicles that
> could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and
> U.S. facilities
> in the Middle East." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002
>
> policy towards
> Iraq, I don�t think there can be any question about Saddam�s
> has systematically violated, over the course of the past
> 11 years, every
> significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm
> and destroy his
> chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
> This he has
> refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate
> and authority of
> international weapons inspectors; and he games the system
> to keep buying
> time against enforcement of the just and legitimate
> demands of the United
> Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our
> allies. Those are
> simply the facts." -- Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002
>
>
But then, Iraq didn't have any WMD, didn't support
terrorists, and wasn't really a threat to its neighbors, yet
Bush attacked them and let in al Qa'ida.
Go smoke some more dope.
∅baMa∅ Tse Dung
>
> HEIL HITLER! - get used to it, Liberal Fascists!
There are all kinds of corruption. Some are pretty easy to identify.
You can’t miss it when a congressman sells the public’s vote for
money, say, or a husband sets his personal promises at nothing in
order to score some extracurricular sex. But the slow rot that enters
the soul of individuals when the tendrils of the state overcreep the
life of a society—that’s a little tougher to define. It may just be
the toadying deference that steals into your behavior with the guard
who searches you at the airport. Or it could be the baksheesh you pay
the safety inspector to keep your business from being shut down. But
as subtle as the effects may be, the rule is ironclad: the more areas
of life are funded and regulated by government, the less free you are,
and the more corrupt and servile you ultimately become.
Through the work of artist and blogger Patrick Courrielche, Andrew
Breitbart’s new website Big Government http://biggovernment.com/ —
reporting the news so the mainstream media won’t have to—has just
released a sickening transcript of an August 10 conference call
jointly hosted by the National Endowment for the Arts, the White
House’s Office of Public Engagement, and United We Serve, an
initiative overseen by the Corporation for National and Community
Service, a federal agency. The purpose of the call was to urge a group
of pro-Obama artists to get out there and start creating art that
would support the president’s agenda on health care, the environment,
education, and community services. Speaking at the request of “folks
in the White House and folks in the NEA,” Michael Skolnick, political
director for Obama-mad hip-hop mogul Russell Simmons, told the
assembled artists, “All of us who are on this phone call were selected
for a reason, and you are the ones that lead by example in your
communities. You are the thought leaders. You are the ones that, if
you create a piece of art, or promote a piece of art or create a
campaign for a company, and tell our country and our young people sort
of what do and what to be into, and what’s cool and what’s not cool.”
As an artist, I feel it incumbent upon myself to pause here to become
violently ill. Never mind that the phone call may have broken several
lobbying laws. Forget that the NEA’s Yosi Sergant is now proven to
have lied when he denied the NEA’s role in initiating the call. Let’s
not even concern ourselves with the fact that White House official
Buffy Wicks directed the artists to channel their efforts through
Serve.gov, a White House website with ties to the corrupt Acorn.
No, let’s just talk about art. It’s hard out here on us creative types
right now. When times are tough, truth and beauty sink pretty low on
the national shopping list. The NEA, according to its own website, is
“the nation’s largest annual funder of the arts.” It gives tens of
millions of dollars a year in grants to artists and art organizations.
It does this, according to the legislation that established it, to
“help create and sustain not only a climate encouraging freedom of
thought, imagination, and inquiry but also the material conditions
facilitating the release of this creative talent.” It is there, in
other words, to protect artists’ freedom from the corrupting influence
of financial deprivation.
The transcript of this phone call proves that the NEA has deeply
betrayed that mission. Corrupted by the White House, it has moved to
corrupt the artists who look to it for their daily bread. It doesn’t
matter that it didn’t actually offer these artists money in exchange
for propaganda; its very presence on the line constituted an implied
offer of access. It doesn’t matter that the artists on the call were
already Obama supporters. Simply by presenting a mission that excluded
those who did not support the president’s agenda, the NEA violated the
very first principle of its establishing legislation: “The arts and
the humanities belong to all the people of the United States.”
And whether or not these artists will bite into the apple of
governmental corruption—whether or not they’ll allow their creativity
to be guided by the blandishments of the state—the phone call is proof
of the depths of this administration’s intentions to corrupt. It
seeks, as statist government always seeks, to modify and control human
behavior through the doling out and withholding of money and favor.
And in seeking to enlist the arts, it has taken this overbearing and
ultimately corrupting practice to the deepest and most spiritual level
we know.
PC
"Slim" <slim...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9C99EEBC8F5C0IXIM@localhost...
> On 23 Sep 2009, "panjandrum" <som...@ilwp4c.com> posted some
> news:M8udnTJgzbAAVSfX...@giganews.com:
>
>> "Liberals will be the first to go" <no...@none.org> wrote in
>> message news:Xns9C8E769CA9AC7CRZA3@localhost...
>>> On 21 Sep 2009, vtc <v...@dead.com> posted some
>>> news:ZOSdneK_EsjSkiXX...@posted.widowmaker:
>>>
>>>>> 0baMa0's Reichskulturkammer
>>>>>
>>>>> http://bighollywood.breitbart.com/pcourrielche/2009/09/21/explosive-
>>> capabilities pose a
>>> very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical
>>> weapons before,
>>> is working to
>>> develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial
>>> vehicles that
>>> could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and
>>> U.S. facilities
>>> in the Middle East." -- John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002
>>>
>>> policy towards
>>> Iraq, I don't think there can be any question about Saddam's
>>> conduct. He
>>> has systematically violated, over the course of the past
>>> 11 years, every
>>> significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm
>>> and destroy his
>>> chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity.
>>> This he has
>>> refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate
>>> and authority of
>>> international weapons inspectors; and he games the system
>>> to keep buying
>>> time against enforcement of the just and legitimate
>>> demands of the United
>>> Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our
>>> allies. Those are
>>> simply the facts." -- Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002
>>>
>>>
>>
>> But then, Iraq didn't have any WMD, didn't support
>> terrorists, and wasn't really a threat to its neighbors, yet
>> Bush attacked them and let in al Qa'ida.
>>
>> Go smoke some more dope.
>
>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:17:17 -0500
> From: "panjandrum" <som...@ilwp4c.com>
> Newsgroups:
> wi.general,milw.general,milw.jobs,wi.madison.general,alt.sports.football.p
> ro.gb-packers
> References: <f3c26372-2a63-4fca-a9e3-
> c163a9...@d4g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
> <ZOSdneK_EsjSkiXX...@posted.widowmaker>
> <Xns9C8E769CA9AC7CRZA3@localhost>
> In-Reply-To: <Xns9C8E769CA9AC7CRZA3@localhost>
>
> Congratulations, you illiterate fucktard. Next time TRY at least to read
> the first part of a post before you reply.
>
> "http://www.cnn.com/US/9812/16/clinton.iraq.speech/
>
> "Earlier today I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and
> security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces," Clinton
> said.
>
> "Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological
> weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors,"
> said Clinton."
>
Hey dipshit - that was in 1998.
panjandrum
news:Xns9C99EEBC8F5C0IXIM@localhost...
> On 23 Sep 2009, "panjandrum" <som...@ilwp4c.com> posted
> some
> news:M8udnTJgzbAAVSfX...@giganews.com:
>
>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:17:17 -0500
> From: "panjandrum" <som...@ilwp4c.com>
> Newsgroups:
> wi.general,milw.general,milw.jobs,wi.madison.general,alt.sports.football.p
> ro.gb-packers
> References: <f3c26372-2a63-4fca-a9e3-
> c163a9...@d4g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
> <ZOSdneK_EsjSkiXX...@posted.widowmaker>
> <Xns9C8E769CA9AC7CRZA3@localhost>
> In-Reply-To: <Xns9C8E769CA9AC7CRZA3@localhost>
>
> Congratulations, you illiterate fucktard. Next time TRY
> at least to read
> the first part of a post before you reply.
>
>
> "Earlier today I ordered America's armed forces to strike
> military and
> security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British
> forces," Clinton
> said.
>
> "Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and
> biological
> weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its
> neighbors,"
> said Clinton."
>
>
The point is that, according to Bush's hand-picked
investigator, no such facilities existed since at least
(mark the year) 1998.
IF Hussein had such programs, Clinton got them. You know,
the guy all you drooling imbeciles said did nothing about
terrorism.
Go smoke some dope.
Irving Layton
Stupid.
panjandrum
news:haee09$34e$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Liberal Fascists!
>
> Stupid.
>
>
He'd have to wise up to be stupid.