How widely used is it? (In particular, how widely used is .translate()
rather than .winkTranslate()?)
I don't mind changing the name, but it's unclear that there's a better
name out there. It would be unfortunate to have to reserve the use of a
name as generic as "translate" for a particular library.
In any case we should definitely ask Wink to avoid unprefixed names.
That's asking for trouble.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
You wrote:
> It would be unfortunate to have to reserve the use of a name as
> generic as "translate" for a particular library.
Indeed. That said, the name "translate" already means something in the
platform—it's used by CSS transforms and by the <canvas> 2D Context API.
Wink's usage of the term matches the existing use of the term on the
platform.
Maybe we should rename the "is this element translatable or not"
attribute to, say, "translatable".
Ted