Re: Digest for whatsrunning@googlegroups.com - 3 Messages in 1 Topic

[Michael A. Bloom]

The first time I tried WR 3.0 Beta on my Vista Home Premium machine,  I had a similar problem,  only it was a dark green, not red.   As I recall, it was only in the Processes tab,  just like the currently reported problem except for the color.  When it went away,   I just assumed that Christer had fixed it. 

On 1/23/2010 5:54 AM, whatsrunni...@googlegroups.com wrote:

 Topic: Red background

Charles <hebe...@hotmail.com> Jan 22 11:44AM -0800 ^
 
I get a red background when in process view, it's very hard to read
and yes just in process view.
Is there a way to fix this?


 

Christer Fahlgren <christer...@gmail.com> Jan 22 12:18PM -0800 ^
 
Charles,
 
I would appreciate if you could send me a screenshot as I can't
reproduce this on my machine.
 
What OS are you using? And what version WR are you testing?
 
/Christer
 


 

"Mike_th" <mikew...@gmail.com> Jan 23 03:32AM +0700 ^
 
Hi Christer,
 
I also got that 'red background' on my WinXP Pro SP3, after installing the
latest update WR 3.0 Beta 7.
Screenshot attached.
 
Regards,
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles" <hebe...@hotmail.com>
To: "WhatsRunning" <whatsr...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 2:44 AM
Subject: Red background
 
 


 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WhatsRunning" group.
To post to this group, send email to whatsr...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to whatsrunning...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/whatsrunning?hl=en.

[Michael A. Bloom]

Christer,

Here's a feature request for something that I think a lot of people
could use. (I know I certainly could!)

New columns in the IP Connections tab:

Heading Content means
------ ------------------------------------------
Bsent Bytes sent on this socket
Brecvd Bytes Received on this socket
Psent Packets Sent ""
Precvd Packets Received ""
%Sent Percentage of current outbound throughput
%Recvd Percentage of current inbound throughput

Since packet sizes vary, I think the last two would only make sense in
terms of bytes.
Among other things, these columns could really help in keeping an eye
out for network hogs.

The percentage Sent and Recvd could be just percentage of total system
throughput in the given direction, or percentage of throughput in that
direction on each active specific network interface. (for the purposes
of this program, an interface might be considered active the first time
a successful transmission or reception occurs - that would eliminate the
need to configure which interface(s) are active)

What do you think?

- Michael