I have to bow out for the moment, due to another meeting. I will try to return...
Biologist, USGS Core Science Systems, Core Science Analytics & Synthesis Program
-----Original Message-----
From:
wg-...@googlegroups.com [mailto:
wg-...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Arlin Stoltzfus
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 11:53 AM
To:
wg-...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: working group proposal
On Nov 20, 2012, at 5:53 PM, David Patterson wrote:
I recommend an emphasis on Use Cases during the conference call.
Thanks. I agree that this should be the main emphasis. After we get some preliminaries out of the way, I would like to get a quick list of major use-cases, and a quick sense of similarities and differences. But we also need to have some discussion about what the working group will produce-- standards, whitepapers, reference implementations, ?
Arlin
Paddy
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Arlin Stoltzfus <
ar...@umd.edu> wrote:
Dear all--
Thanks to the efforts of Rob, Matt, Hilmar and others, a proposal is starting to emerge here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fsVxkTtl-Q3Na5ZNNdOvV5OwDjra9V3VpLtd5xzDJZY/edit
The goal is to facilitate aggregation and linking across multiple services or namebanks, so as to better deliver expert name-mappings to users doing data integration. The perceived means to achieve that goal is standardization, with the qualification that the preferred strategy is to draw on ontologies to represent taxon information as an aid to flexible (including lightweight) discovery and reasoning. The practical focus is on addressing demand (use-cases in data integration), especially where it involves key projects such as OToL, EoL, Map of Life, etc.
I hope that outline is broad enough to provide opportunities for all of you to participate. I wish we had more time for a deliberative group process to arrive at the goals together, but I'm afraid that isn't practical. Again, I apologize for the rushed nature of this project.
So, I would suggest, by way of preparing for the teleconference tomorrow (connection info will be sent separately), to think about what you can bring to that kind of plan, and to consider adding your thoughts to the proposal text. What key challenges can you see based on your experience? What resources can you bring to the project, including use-cases, code, expertise, time? Are you willing to be a PI on the proposal? (note that Rob and Matt have volunteered, and I have withdrawn from that role) Can you help us rush through this over the next 10 days to get it done?
Arlin
-------
Arlin Stoltzfus (
ar...@umd.edu)
Fellow, IBBR; Adj. Assoc. Prof., UMCP; Research Biologist, NIST
IBBR, 9600 Gudelsky Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850