First, let me say that I've never fully understood the creature action cards. The fact that some of them are almost indistinguishable from character action cards makes it even worse (why did they do that?!?). In fact, "Dazzling Display" is an attack card that entirely looks like a character action card. The only trait it lists is Diestro. If I had a Diestro I'd probably want that card too! But this is not the reason for my sudden doubt.
Note: For the rest of this post I will be using the Greenskins (not counting the Squig or adventure specific foes) for my examples. This gives us Snotlings, Goblins, Orcs, and Black Orcs.
Here is my first question: Looking briefly through the book they tell me that creatures all have basic actions. I assume this means the basic actions that the characters get. Is that correct? Does this include the actions with the traits, "Basic, Greenskins"? In this example, does this mean all Greenskins get, "Chop!" and "Stick Em wif da Pointy End" (they both say, "Basic, Greenskins")? Or maybe it means the ONLY basic actions they get are those two?
Second question: The way I used to give out action cards to my foes was Id give them access to all cards that were labelled Greenskins. This meant they got (in addition to the above basic cards) Stomp, Swarm 'Em!, Jeer n Jab, Warpath, Crush Em Good!, Da Big Smash!, Pig Sticka, and Ed Butt! As you can see, that's a lot of cards and I was always thinking this couldn't be right!
Now ive skimmed the book and it tells me creatures can only get extra action cards relating to the action card symbols on their stat cards. However, of all the Greenskins, only the Black Orc is entitled to ANY extra action cards, and even then he only gets one melee card. This can't be right. I can't see "Swarm Em!" being used by Black Orcs, and I can't see Snotlings or Goblins NOT using that card. This also means that ALL of the other Greenskins only get their basic action cards and that's it.
So my question? WHO THE HELL GETS WHAT CARDS?!?!?
Oh, and, yes, I know I can just wing it but I'd like to know how it really is supposed to work!
Thanks!
Steve
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "WFRP3 Virtual RPG" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to wfrp3-virtual-...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to wfrp3-vi...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wfrp3-virtual-rpg?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
I have to say, I love this game but there are lots of times (with this and other FFG games) when I get the sense that a lot of stuff was designed without actual play involved. I think most GMs would've told them to deal with this during the test phase, just like the awesome concept/terrible mechanics behind the party sheets. I find a lot of "hand waving" and winging it is required to make this system really sing.
I appreciate you guys giving me some help. It sounds like the only thing I was really doing wrong was assuming there was a mechanical plan to these cards, hence my trying to find and assign them all to their proper owners. With that in mind, let me now ask two more questions and tell me what you think they INTENDED the usage to be?
first, you said they DON'T get their own basic cards? I'm not sure I understand this. For players, basic cards are automatic. For creatures... what are they there for?
Second question: what about cards that specifically say they belong to a creature? Do you think they intended for them to automatically be given to them. For example, Skaven Clan Eshin have their "warpstone throwing stars" card which specifies they belong to the Clan Eshin assassin.
Oh! I almost forgot! What's the deal with cards that look exactly like they are for players (like my Diestro card example)? Does anyone understand the design intent there? Is there a good reason to make them look exactly the same? I think one supplement even suggested letting players use them when reasonable (not sure if I recall that correctly). This seems really backwards to me. Am I wrong?