Amar Fashi Chai Bangla Pdf Free Download
Manric Hock
@noprayer4dying: chachhuuuuuuuu!!!!! agula ki diso>???? amra jani U LOVE DARK PHOTO :p .....bt tai bole akhaneo????? heheheeh.....!!!!! anywayz...... aro chobi cahi....... baki ra shob gelo koi???
@zeba api: oi mia...... shobai dekse to ki hoise....abar dekbe....bar bar dekbe.......taratari chobi post koro...... nahole kintu ami e post kore dibo tomar ta.....lolz!!!!
ages ago(permalink)
Chiriakhana-r prothom khacha-te amar live photo ache...................................................ok, eto kore jokhon chichen, bido. Ektu waite koren........."jodi emandar how, tobe dhoirjo dhoro"-Al-Quran.
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
S'uhas [ BAT out of HELL ] edited this topic ages ago.
Shahrul bhai, joggo ek loker osadharon portrait tulesen. Egie jan...amra panar pise asi. Tipu bhai apnar kono khoti korte parben na. Hehehe....
Originally posted ages ago. (permalink)
TaruPallab edited this topic ages ago.
oi undha (ulta) hoyea asay keno?
bhor bela relgari tay chorlay amon chobi dekha jai. raster dharay hagtay boslay jodi tren asay tokhon undha hoyea mukh lukai (ami boltay chacchi na shahrul hagtay boschay).
ages ago(permalink)
Washim vai, apner cheharai eto texture ken? eyta ki jonmogoto naki tatto korchen??? Jodi jonmogoto hoy shomossha nai, toy tatto korle ektu thikana-ta diyen.......ekdin oy dukane jamuni.......
ages ago(permalink)
@shironamhin: Are eishob kotha bolbana to jekhane shekhane. Amar chatro-chatrira egulo porle amar lecture shunbe na, bolbe, sir, chipay cholen, bilat theke ashchen to tai, apnare barmeej sentu khawabone...
@shahriar vai: eita amar ghotoker kach theke neya chobi. chobi disilam meye khujte. but ei chobi keu dekhena. ghotoker file e pore thakte thakte cheeta pore gese... :(
ages ago(permalink)
bhaiera aibar Hammem bhair fulanota aktu komabo naki?abar unina kede fele!bhai hammem amito apnar hashi dekhe bhablam apni nijai onek bhaggoban je amar bondhur moto shundor hasita peachen!hoho!bhaijan shujogta hatchara korte monta chailona!
tipu bhai amio shobar shathe akmot apni holen chiro shobuj!doa kori apnara shobai chiro shobuj thaken.
ages ago(permalink)
The recent fiasco surrounding three books published by Adarsha has caught the public eye after the publishers were refused a stall at Boi Mela this year. One of the books, Bangaleer Mediocrityr Sondhane (2022) written by Faham Abdus Salam has received special attention as Bangla Academy has specifically flagged it as vulgar. The book itself is essentially a collection of philosophical polemics, which sometimes take the form of politically charged rhetoric. I object to the book on entirely different grounds than that of the Bangla Academy.
Where Faham Abdus Salam calls Bengalis mediocre, in my soon-to-be-published book, Before You Shame My People, I see Bangladeshis as a highly promising nation of tortured people who, at the same time, have dissented against and been crushed by the powers of colonialism, imperialism, and an ancestral and oligarchical political system.
The author and I reach the same conclusion in our books, but our narration differs. He says that Bengalis have become a state before they could become a polity. Their place in that state has become that of subjects and not citizens. I admit that our state has reduced us to subjects and we have been excluded from the structures of citizenry; but that is not the people's fault. The blame falls squarely upon the system that has been inflicted upon us. The people should not be put on the stand, the system deserves that place.
It's true that Bengalis have not been able to become a citizenry. But is that a failure of the people, or were they denied the opportunity to become citizens by the colonial power structures that have remained undisturbed even today? Did Bengalis not fight for change? Does the idea of citizenship remain limited to that of Western neoliberal citizenship? When supreme sacrifices have been made repeatedly, how can one deny that the people of this land have fought to become citizens?
The author has pointed out other flaws in Bengalis, but his explanations suffer from a lack of depth. According to him, Bengalis don't understand that the legal code has a purpose beyond punishments. But what is the reason behind that? Do Bengalis come out of their mother's womb with the "fashi chai" slogan on their lips? No! They are driven towards a punitive understanding of the legal system by the socio-political realities surrounding them.
Another problem apparent in Salam's writing is his love for the West. In his book, he has put the liberal thoughts of the West on a pedestal. His discussions convey the idea that there is nothing better than Western liberalism, that we must copy that liberalism for ourselves. This is an imperialist line of thought, or in simpler terms, it serves the agenda of NATO. He is right that even though we are used to a "modern" lifestyle, we still allow archaic, tribal ways of thinking. But what is the direct problem in that? In my upcoming book, I have put liberal secularism and individualism on the stand. Is individualism the be-all and end-all?
Another thing that has come up in the book's discussion is the distance between society and the state. The author has tried to say that the collective unity of Bengalis runs into obstacles in society, not at the level of the state. He has also said that Bengalis gained a state before they could grasp the idea of collective ownership. These claims have historical flaws.
A state isn't something so great that a person needs to earn it. A state isn't a lollipop that we wanted dearly and that the British Raj bestowed upon us. If colonisation had not happened, then we would have come upon a liberal state by ourselves. The state is only an institution that is supposed to safeguard the interests of society. In that sense, of course we deserve a society. We can ask whether this state serves society as diligently as possible, but the question of deserving society is no question at all. It's like saying the entity that has allowed the state to exist, deserves it.
His discussion captures a love for the West, but at the same time, it has surprising postcolonial sentiments. He tells us we need to be more like the West, but also gives us the indication that we need a proper revolution of our own. I would have agreed with him, if he didn't put the blame of this reality on the shoulder of Bengalis, inadvertently absolving the structures of state and power.
b37509886e