John Robinson
unread,Dec 26, 2024, 11:24:01 AM12/26/24Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Science YOU Should Be READING
⚡️Energy Facilities Under Attack🚨Russians Attack Non-Stop🛳 Shadow Fleet🎖 Military Summary 2024/12/26 [23:17]
⚡️Energy Facilities Under Attack🚨Russians Attack Non-Stop🛳 Shadow Fleet🎖 Military Summary 2024.12.26
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
⚡️Energy Facilities Under Attack🚨Russians Attack Non-Stop🛳 Shadow Flee...
|
|
|
Military Summar321K subscribers
118,283 views • Premiered 6 hours ago - Dec 26, 2024
This video describes the military situation in Ukraine on the 26th of December 2024
415 Comments (abridged)
Sort byAdd a comment...
@snuffle2269
5 hours ago"Destroying the country's energy system is a legitimate military necessity" NATO press secretary Jamie Shea said in 1999 during the attacks on Yugoslavia. "And if at the same time the civilian population suffers, then this is solely the fault of the country's leadership." ---- Washington Post NATO's own words come back to haunt them.437Reply17 replies
@kobked-x
5 hours agoExactly so!32Reply
@drmr_mist
5 hours agoThose words do not haunt NATO, but Ukraine and its people. This war needs to stop soon!33Reply
@bluikkso
5 hours agoExcept that sadly those words don't matter. 1) "whataboutism" 2) "they are bad, we and our allies are good" 3) double standards & hypocrisy.35Reply
@BigallBrazil
4 hours agoThe gas supply cutoff by Ukraine will force Russia to take part of Mikolaiv, Odessa to install new connection through Transnistria, Romania, Moldova. No matter how long it takes.26Reply
@demos436
3 hours agoBTW, this words can be confirmed if you will use WaPo's search engine with words "Jamie Shea NATO 1999 Yugoslavia energy system."12Reply
@DaniilBalkans-jh2rw
3 hours agoThank you very much, God bless you.6Reply
@PlanetWalking-qd8gv
3 hours ago @drmr_mist Just wait a couple of years2Reply
@bcc1955
3 hours agoClassic hypocrisy.4Reply
@stolek6908
2 hours ago @drmr_mist YES BUT NO. UKRAINA IS ''DE YURE'' ALREADY IN NATO. NATO IS GIVIN UKRAINA EVERYTHING THEY HADReply
@snuffle2269
2 hours ago @demos436 THANK YOU1Reply
@ChaptermasterPedroKantor-kv5yw
2 hours ago @stolek6908 No, NATO is not in practice already in NATO, but NATO is in practice fighting a war against Russia.1Reply
@richardgraham7055
2 hours ago(04:20) "...Ukrainians reported they managed to bring down lots of missiles of Kalibr type, of Kh-101 type,… a lot of missiles but most of them managed to reach the targets.” : wonderfully sardonic smirk, Mr. Dima — Bravo!!2Reply
@johnnybegood3017
2 hours agoHypocrisy in amerika & Nato reigns supreme.2Reply
@stolek6908
1 hour ago@ChaptermasterPedroKantor-kv5yw wut? nato in nato?Reply
@michaelm5285
1 hour agoWhen your a liar you have to have a good memory1Reply
@l337pwnage
27 minutes agoUntil NATO gets a one way trip to Nuremberg, the problems will continue.3Reply
@s.v.discussion8665
11 minutes agoI remember that.Reply
@Jesuyon77
6 hours agoUkraine always claim they shot down every missile, yet they complain of damage to their energy facilities....What is now damaging these facilities?299Reply23 replies
@illomens2766
6 hours agoThe Ghost of Kiev, it came back to haunt Ukraine with ghostly air raids.62Reply
@ToxoplasmosisVsRodents
6 hours agoThe invisible Ghost of Kiev29Reply
@IronWarhorses
6 hours ago"It's debris from shot down missile" lol.36Reply
@aneurindavies5943
6 hours agoPhantoms and Ghosts !13Reply
@deshbaldur1191
6 hours agoPadający śnieg Translate to English10Reply
@robertmusil1107
5 hours agoThey are damaging themselves with the defense rockets lol10Reply
@OPA_Ceres
5 hours agoDEITranslate to English3Reply
@michaelm5285
5 hours agoFlying monkeys like wizard of oz8Reply
@fabiocardoso7178
5 hours agoProbably flying washing machines. Or hypersonic shovels.27Reply
@nixonrulez
5 hours agoThey're using facilities as air defence5Reply
@matakanan-kiri
5 hours agoGhost of denys davydov Translate to English5Reply
@abandonedbuildingexplorer
5 hours agoTheir own incompetence.2Reply
@Somethingsomethingsomethin-z4g
5 hours ago"Debris"Translate to English1Reply
@MdumiseniOJali
5 hours agoUkrainians are so precise,in a way of intercepting 250 of 200 strikes4Reply
@Bayethe
5 hours agoWhat they mean to say is that they used the energy facilities to intercept and destroy the missiles 9Reply
@wallygator57190
4 hours agoI think it is showels coupled with washing machine chips3Reply
@apostolosderakis9840
3 hours agoNorth Koreans on f16s2Reply
@ivanvoloder8114
3 hours ago @Bayethe 2Reply
@grahamhireme9283
3 hours agoJesuyon77 North Korean bamboo shovels………duh!1Reply
@David-nz6ox
2 hours agoThe weight of their lies3Reply
@MnemonicCarrier
2 hours agoThe hand of God1Reply
1 hour agoyou mean russia pretend to shut down all missile and drone but there is always a fire where they have been shut down ;)Dima propaganda channel ;)Reply
@austindenotter19
1 hour agoShovelsReply
@OrkDiktator
4 hours agoThe entire of Ukraine is an air defense system. They down the Russian missiles and drones using their buildings, bases, airfields, powerplants etc. That's why Ukraine always always has a 100% successful AD83Reply2 replies
@snezanalugumuerski5329
3 hours ago6Reply
@ChaptermasterPedroKantor-kv5yw
2 hours ago3Reply
@TheDayAfter1984
4 hours agoShadow Fleet = Ships that are not insured by London/Blackrock 139Reply6 replies
@grahamhireme9283
3 hours agoJust as well Germany, Italy and Japan had their boats covered by Lloyds circa 1939-1945. Wait! They didn’t? Well how did that work?4Reply
@jackzgb1232
1 hour agoMaybe you ment: Shadow Fleet = Ships that are not insured FROM London/Blackrock?4Reply
@MisterCloud6789
1 hour agoYou are absolutely rightReply
@TheDayAfter1984
1 hour ago @jackzgb1232 Correct, sorry for my bad English, appreciated.Reply
@jackzgb1232
1 hour agoNo, it was a joke. Both are ok. If you are insured by them they will not attack you, so you are ok. If they do not insure you they will sink you so you are not insured from them 1Reply
@cotizacionesequipo1719
1 hour agoThank you for clearing that up, as I am sure a lot of people don't actually know that.2Reply
@AchillesHeel-e7e
5 hours agoRussia is not our enemy. From the UK with love!90Reply2 replies
1 hour agocope bot,try something new next timeReply
@jogriffiths5766
40 minutes agoYou are the bot!1Reply
@Njanja-po3qe
3 hours ago (edited)Basically US UK and nato 50 nations are losing their proxy war in Ukraine like they lost in Vietnam Afghanistan. 53Reply3 replies
@calanbennett6817
3 hours agoThe USA has over 700 F-16s so why didn't they donate 600 of them on day 1. Also Surface to Air defense systems why ration them to an ally that needs them. Strange game this SMOReply
@konstantink7310
2 hours ago @calanbennett6817 because they all get destroyed and loose money , and they don’t have that many Pilots ?10Reply
1 hour ago @konstantink7310 no because they gived old equipment that NATO don't use anymore(ww1 ww2 era)So NATO dosent care about thoses gift,they are obselete anyways.F16 still fly not like black sea fleet not doing anything ;)1Reply
@kiprotichngetich8490
5 hours agoATACMS change nothing in the battlefield it only increases troubles for Ukraine energy facilities60Reply3 replies
@damonalagich4524
4 hours agothey change the stockpiling of supplies absolutely, got to spread shit out so it's a minor target.Reply
@ahumakyemfietv865
3 hours agoA lot of trouble guysReply
@MisterCloud6789
1 hour agoYepReply
@summerlake356
5 hours ago (edited)Ursa Major ship: SBS (Special Boat Services) UK special forces, slightly less famous than the SAS. They specialise in these types of operations, and the UK is fanatical and cocky enough to have done it.81Reply2 replies
@PetarPopara
3 hours agoMeanwhile, Russia has the largest submarine fleet, but it sits idly underwater. As long as it hesitates to engage British actors, such attacks will multiply. Obviously the war can't be confined to Ukraine: wherever in the world Russians operate, they are exposed and taking losses. Focus? You can do it when playing chess, but not when fighting a real war. The whole world is a chessboard and focus means little more than narrowing one's mind. Russia is to NATO as a whole what Ukraine is to Russia.1Reply
@lorneiggulden7123
2 hours ago. The Russian submarines are loaded with nuclear weapons and sitting off the coastal waters of NATO countries.5Reply
@NickyDekker89
3 hours agoZelensky complaining about missile attacks during Christmas while rejecting a Christmas ceasefire. 21Reply1 reply
@justarandomname420
2 hours agoOrthodox Christmas is next month.They don't give AF what the Pope says.3Reply
@alanjones8810
5 hours agoThe Russians don't have a shadow fleet,they just have a fleet.Russians don't need shipsUnlike the UK The UK needs ships, and the euro tunnel, without these the UK, is I big trouble.So surely the UK would not try to distroying the kurch bridge or sink ships.Only an idiot would involve themselves in such stupidity. Show less62Reply4 replies
@carbondriver
5 hours ago@alanjones8810 "Only an idiot would involve themselves in such stupidity." -> They seem to be stupid enough to do this.17Reply
@awalk5177
5 hours agoI think they are referring to the over 100 "retired" Oil tankers that Russia bought to transfer its own Oil when the west imposed sanctions on shipping insurance for Russia. So Russia uses now its own ships and the Insurance companies, mainly European underwriters, lost a huge amount of business. The west likes to describe everything Russian as something sinister.17Reply
@SterileNeutrino
4 hours ago @awalk5177 This is correct6Reply
@corvusduluth
2 hours ago (edited)Does UK depend on the Langeled gas transmission pipeline from Norway?3Reply
@TK421-53
5 hours ago
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
| |
⚡️Energy Facilities Under Attack🚨Russians Attack Non-Stop🛳 Shadow Flee...
|
|
|
Ursa Major is a Russian owned dry cargo ship, it was transporting cargo heading for Vladivostok. Dima is now using the BROADEST possible definition of the term SHADOW FLEET, as it now seems to cover any Russian cargo vessel, instead of any ship, regardless of ownership, involved in transporting Russian oil and other resources for export. The term SHADOW FLEET is using a western biased definition. There is nothing shadow about this Russian cargo ship. If it was sabotage it was another act of war in international waters against a Russian vessel. The west keeps poking and they keep acting surprised once they get bit… but they are still hiding behind proxies hoping to break Russia economically and politically, in order to overthrow the government in another color revolution and take over with the final goal of liquidation of assets and Balkanization. The western dream…