🚫 Russia Rejects The Truce ✂️ Main Road Cut Off 📰 Military Summary And Analysis for 27/12/2024 [11:33] Dec 27, 2024 (27 - 1)

[John Robinson]

🚫 Russia Rejects The Truce ✂️ Main Road Cut Off 📰 Military Summary And Analysis for 27/12/2024 [11:33]



🚫 Russia Rejects The Truce ✂️ Main Road Cut Off 📰 Military Summary And Analysis for 27.12.2024

|
|
|
| | |

|

|
|
| |
🚫 Russia Rejects The Truce ✂️ Main Road Cut Off 📰 Military Summary And...


|

|

|

f


Military Summary321K subscribers
 124,353 views Premiered 6 hours ago - Dec 27, 2024
This video describes the military situation in Ukraine on the 27th of December 2024

451 Comments (abridged)

Sort byAdd a comment...Pinned by Military Summary@militarysummary6 hours agoDownload iOS Military Summary Map: https://itunes.apple.com/app/id6477433117THE MAP: https://militarysummary.comStore: https://www.militarysummary.store/Google doc: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18WfJv1_DOlFOzvjh6iT1N8ltDvaCeWu1cPK_eaHKCR4/edit?usp=sharingRumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-1613003Telegram channel: https://t.me/militarysummaryTwitter: https://twitter.com/MilitarySummaryEmail: military.s...@gmail.comPatreon: https://www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=trueHelp the channel: https://www.donationalerts.com/r/military_summaryHelp the channel: https://www.patreon.com/militarySummary?fan_landing=trueRead more31Reply3 replies
@ЕвгенийИзмайлов-м2м
5 hours agoСРОЧНАЯ ВАКАНСИЯ️️️Идёт набор в чсв "Zagner" защищать хозяев, и их дачи.Чтобы хозяева и дальше загнали баб со всей России в Москву,и любили их за деньги.1Reply
@abandonedbuildingexplorer
4 hours agoI love you Dima. I hate UKRAINE's illegitimate government.3Reply
@Cba409
2 hours agoFor the motherland!1Reply
@OleDiaBole
5 hours ago (edited)When nato say ceasefire or truce, they think rearming and regrouping of their unfortunate proxies... After Yugoslavia, two Minsk deals, Istambul-deal, breaking of intermidiate missile deal, Russians FINALY came to their senses about how west honour their promises.402Reply23 replies
@carbondriver
5 hours agoTrue, but I wonder: How can Russia ever return to peaceful coexistence when making a treaty with its neighbors and trust on it is no longer an option? Stay in war mode forever?8Reply
@victorlombardi1149
4 hours agoIt's a treacherous organization.14Reply
@matiasmontaldo2616
4 hours ago​ @carbondriver  well, this is what happened until now, the cold war never stopped. After USSR disolution the americans were fighting russians in chechnia, russian territory, and in abjazhia, osetia, Georgia, transnistria and kirghizstan. And it was the 90s and 2000s. So this period of history only allowed the US to recover their proxies. The permanent war situation is better for Russia.17Reply
@kampfer91
4 hours ago @carbondriver  Eventually the common folks of EU will fed up with NATO war hawk and find someone who try to be friendly with Russia .24Reply
@davidcritchley3509
4 hours agoWhen it comes to Russia. Trust nothing America and Europe say.18Reply
@libertarianbydefault
4 hours ago @carbondriver  The arrangements should not be based on trust, of which there is none, but on physical setup. For example, Russian military contingents at key points on Ukrainian territory - something that can physically prevent Ukraine and NATO from doing something stupid again. Regular inspections that monitor the size and armament of Ukrainian army, etc. Uncool for Ukraine? - You bet. That's what you get for starting and losing a war.24Reply
@dcahodl
4 hours ago​ @carbondriver  I guess it will go on until the idea of Ukraine joining nato is off the table entirely. As for peaceful coexistence, they managed to achieve it with the Chechen republic and there was a time when that seemed impossible too.13Reply
@jamesgornall5731
4 hours ago​ @dcahodl as long as Ukraine insists on the 1991 borders, it cannot be considered for entry to NATO anyway; you cannot have ongoing territorial disputes. Russia merely has to occupy, eventually arrange an armistice, and Ukraine would have to not only de facto but de jure acknowledge the loss of these oblasts in order to even make an application to join.2Reply
@monikaweigand-stubenvoll400
4 hours agoAs in the Cold War? Yes. How ever trust this mishpoge.Reply
@kurtvanluven9351
4 hours agoAn excuse to try and live their glory days againWITH MY MONEY!1Reply
@dcahodl
3 hours ago (edited) @jamesgornall5731  you're right and I'm aware of those technicalities. But I also think that the idea is to make the west realise that Ukraine, especially the eastern part and Crimea, are off limits for them and that Russia is not going to just roll over and let them take it under their control like they did with the Baltic countries.4Reply
@Stop-this714
3 hours agoTotally agree ️🇬🇧1Reply
@marcelogidi9623
3 hours agoMaybe is not Nato , but for sure US and Uk are .2Reply
@Max_Da_G
3 hours ago @jamesgornall5731  1991 borders of Ukraine were never submitted to UN, so really there are no legal borders they can claim. Also, more importantly, Ukraine had DIFFERENT borders BEFORE August 1991. THOSE borders might be indeed restored. Zeledruggo should be careful what he wishes for ;)6Reply
@jamesgornall5731
3 hours ago @dcahodl  indeed, there's also the strategic imperative of maintaining Crimea and the warm-water port of Sevastopol, these are legitimate concerns and any nation state would consider the loss of such critical territory a reason to use military means. The UK fought Argentina over the inconsequential Falkland islands, after all.3Reply
@jamesgornall5731
3 hours ago @Max_Da_G  quite so. In any event, John Mearsheimer was correct back in 2022 when he said that Russia would take the ethnic Russian parts of Ukraine and wreck the Western part of the country. Who will foot the bill for that cleanup operation is anyone's guess at this point.1Reply
@irenagreg7373
2 hours ago @carbondriver  Just replace word "Russia" with "Europe".... Now your statement make more sense. Without going deep into history of European continent, you have : 1) French - Napoleon invasion of Russia in 1812, 2) WW I -1914 and Germans and Austrians on the Russian fields. 3) Western intervention in Russia in 1918 - 1919. 4) German Barbarossa in 1941 including many European allies. I am not going to repeat all the broken treaties and deals regarding conflict on *krain.Show less3Reply
@bbcisaids6727
2 hours agoNazo are there to protect the eu from its citizens Reply
@ethercruiser1537
2 hours agoReply
@aleksanderpeca759
1 hour agoTo je resnica1Reply
@spamfilter32
52 minutes agoPutin learned from Syria just what NATO means when they say "pause" or "freeze in place" a conflict.2Reply
@lorneiggulden7123
7 minutes ago​@davidcritchley3509 When it comes to America and the EU trust nothing the rest of the world says.Reply

5 minutes agocope botReply
@victorlombardi1149
5 hours agoRussia will not accept NATO's ridiculous proposals !Go Russia ! To Victory !318Reply12 replies
@tucker2074
5 hours agoThe Russians have no deterrence how can they win?3Reply
@demirdemir2227
5 hours ago​ @tucker2074  they have allready won34Reply
@andrzejd5301
5 hours ago @tucker2074  Hahahaha they are winning already come on wake up then catch up23Reply
@tucker2074
5 hours ago @demirdemir2227  Putin's hopeless, he lost Russia's deterrence2Reply
@noIMspartacus2
4 hours ago @tucker2074  Easy on the opioids sparky...15Reply
@libertarianbydefault
4 hours ago @tucker2074  You got electricity in Kiev? Make most of it, mate.19Reply
@tucker2074
3 hours ago @noIMspartacus2  can't even get them out of Kursk the blokes hopelessReply
@tucker2074
3 hours ago @libertarianbydefault  yeah that will teach the Americans Reply
@josephineshidute2093
1 hour agoGlory to Russia 🇷🇺1Reply
@sweet6827
1 hour ago @josephineshidute2093 länge leve Ryssland! 🇷🇺Reply
@danielchee9655
1 hour ago (edited) @tucker2074 : Russia is winning. there no way that Ukraine will be in NATO. The whole freaking conflict is because Ukraine wants to be in NATO. Ukraine should have remained neutral and stayed out of NATO when Ukraine became independent in 1991.Reply
@Schurk-x3d
32 minutes agoNATO is grown with 2 powerfull countries because of this attackReply
@arjuna3234
4 hours agoRussia has to secure whole Ukraine and ignore the West completely130Reply2 replies
@cob705
49 minutes agoYep ASAP2Reply

5 minutes agomaybe in 2000 years they couldReply
@markkelly9621
5 hours agoIsnt the encroachment of NATO threatening Russia one of the root causes of the conflict?Any suggestion by western states that Ukraine should join NATO after the conflict seems to give Russia an incentive to continue the conflict until Ukraine is a husk of a state.96Reply2 replies
@velkanzi
4 hours agoWhich would be typical. Talking peace while wanting war.8Reply
@libertarianbydefault
4 hours ago @velkanzi  That is is the positions of a losing side. Ever seen in the movies when the bad guy loses a fight, and says "Wait, wait, wait, stop! I give up! Let's talk!", only for the good guy to drop down the guard, and the baddie to pull out a shiv and attempt a dirty move? That's a NATO/Ukraine vs Russia situation.14Reply
@elysianfields1671
6 hours agoWhy would Russia accept anything other than full victory now? They are winning and they will win, accomplishing all the goals of the SMO.266Reply37 replies
@psxtuneservice
6 hours agoBecause they cant finish it in 10 years5Reply
@RichErina
5 hours ago @psxtuneservice  or 3days?3Reply
@boris75723
5 hours agoYou mean 72hours kiev as gen.Milley spoke ...just western bs​ @RichErina 33Reply
@scallen3841
5 hours ago​ @RichErina western bs lmao15Reply
@trumpforever6706
5 hours ago​ @psxtuneservice  Imagine how the Taliban would respond to this hypothesis... "Said by someone who could not finish even in 20 years."17Reply
@MeowMeow6118a
5 hours ago @RichErina  Who claimed that? Do you even know or are you just following Propaganda like a used tool.18Reply
@mzerk9324
5 hours agoWinning in 3 yrs? Russia is weak military without nuclear weapons. I don't think Russia can face Poland, Finland in any war if they can't defeat small Ukraine!2Reply
@trumpforever6706
5 hours ago @mzerk9324  Applying your reasoning, even the US without nuclear weapons is weak and could not defeat Russia, since even in 20 years of conflict they have not managed to defeat the Viet Cong in Vietnam and the even fewer Taliban in Afghanistan.19Reply
@wanderingsandmusings9255
5 hours agoBecause it will take many years to reach the dnipr. You say they're winning, but what is your metric? It's a stalemate.1Reply
@MeowMeow6118a
5 hours ago (edited) @wanderingsandmusings9255  The front is moving how is it a stalemate... every inch in citys is getting contested... And that in Russian favor everyday.12Reply
@MeowMeow6118a
4 hours ago @mzerk9324  Ukraine is the biggest country in Europe if we don't count Russia, just saying.6Reply
@etienne8110
4 hours agoBecause the cost of continuing is high.Both in money and men.Russia already has a demographics issue. This only gets worse as more men go to die. It s a precarious balance between going for a bit longer in the hope to gain a better deal, at the cost of further degrading futur prospects of long term Russia... It s a situation where there are no good choice, both comes with costs.Show less2Reply
@Ethorbit
4 hours ago @mzerk9324  How are they considered weak without nuclear weapons, when they literally have a non-nuclear weapon that matches nuclear strength?11Reply
@wanderingsandmusings9255
4 hours ago @MeowMeow6118a  Look at rate of movement of the front, and then calculate time to reach the dnipr. Capture of a tiny field of village is being celebrated. All the claims of ukr collaps from various channels have not come true.1Reply
@flyhigh5056
4 hours agoThey haven’t committed the manpower. Timewise it’s a stalemateReply
@everready800
4 hours ago​@mzerk9324 Small Ukraine as you put it had the largest army in Europe.6Reply
@everready800
4 hours ago​ @wanderingsandmusings9255 You're going by mileage not men and defences. What's behind Pokrovsk? Not much!5Reply
@wanderingsandmusings9255
4 hours ago @everready800  They said the same after bakhmut, avdiievka, lisichansk. Ukr has plenty of manpower, thats how they whistled up 40k men to go into kursk at same time as manning the rest of the line. Rus still struggling to clear kursk (im sure you think its is a trap and deliberate). When Ukr run out of men, although this will probably never happen due to 10s of 1000s of mercenaries, it will be very obvious and accompanied by a political crisis. The nazis in power are left untouched by russia.1Reply
@stephenvanwoert2447
4 hours ago @MeowMeow6118a  Thank you. I was going to say the same thing.1Reply
@stephenvanwoert2447
4 hours ago @etienne8110  Russia is not looking for a better deal. Where do you get that idea?Reply
@MeowMeow6118a
4 hours ago (edited) @wanderingsandmusings9255  No need to discuss with you tbh, since you don't know what manpower issue means and what the result it will bring. Snatching ppl from the streets to send them to the front and trying lowering the fighting age to 18 says already everything. + We also see the big cracks already in Ukraine, if you really following this war and you are up-to-date with the current map then you know what I mean.Oh and a small funny info deepstatemap the Ukrainian war mappers, the dudes tried to flee to Romania and did not make it to flee, soon they will be sitting in Kursk filling the plugs.Show less4Reply
@stephenvanwoert2447
4 hours ago @wanderingsandmusings9255  Ukr. has not collapsed, but they're running out of manpower and nearly all the heavy fortifications that they spent 10 years to build, have been breached. They do not have another layer to fall back to in the east.6Reply
@samomarincek478
3 hours ago @mzerk9324  wow...Ukraine is small? What grade of elementary school are you in...?3Reply
@wanderingsandmusings9255
3 hours ago @stephenvanwoert2447  Any town or city is a fortification. That's why there's never a collapse of the front line. Aside from existing buildings, the 'fortifications' people keep talking about are completely primitive, cheap, and fast to construct, but highly effective given Russian's limited air power. At some point, the observations of the battlefield will cause you to realise you're being fed BS by so many channels on this topic.Reply
@Max_Da_G
3 hours ago @mzerk9324  Your comment makes me genuinely believe that you are not in possession of the organ that does thinking.1Reply
@emmaizu4406
2 hours ago​ @mzerk9324 and what is Ukraine without the constant supplies of military equipment from NATO.... do you all forgot Russia is fighting over 34 countries6Reply
@everready800
2 hours ago (edited)@wanderingsandmusings9255  You mean 20k to take the Kursk nuclear power plant which failed. Blinken himself said tough decisions had to be made about lowering the conscription age to 18yrs. Ukraine is outmanned and outgunned. You're right though..... Ukraine is advancing backwards while Russia is retreating forwards.7Reply
@ethercruiser1537
2 hours agoTo avoid nuclear war.Your name says it all!Reply
@JohnThomas-w8l
2 hours ago​ @mzerk9324 but they have nukes so your "what if" is irrelevant.1Reply
@zatoichi1
2 hours ago​ @wanderingsandmusings9255  How will they continue to hire mercenaries with no money or economy? How will they fight with no weapons?2Reply
@WesleyFisher-vl2zs
1 hour ago​ @wanderingsandmusings9255 is it bs that the Ukranians are advancing towards Kiev at an ever increasing rate?1Reply
@Norrs-fd6zr
53 minutes ago @MeowMeow6118a it’s the kind of ‘stalemate’ where checkmate is inevitable and the loser is asking 3rd persons to ‘finish’ the game for him3Reply
@wanderingsandmusings9255
47 minutes ago @zatoichi1  its all paid for by the us/nato, unlimited funds due to money printingReply
@Slowv8Fiero
44 minutes ago@wanderingsandmusings9255  so your saying zelensky with billions of money and weapons and NATO training and NATO troops, that he can't beat Russia that is so weak and incompetent?2Reply
@wanderingsandmusings9255
34 minutes ago @Slowv8Fiero  you're building a straw man. Zelensky's airforce is minimal, rus has high drone capability like ukr. Sad you have to resort to histrionics. Advancing on the ground is difficult for either side under this regime.Reply
@elysianfields1671
11 minutes ago@ Ukraine is the best army in NATO in the moment.Reply

3 minutes agobecause they can't win in 3 day's to take kievReply
@КартерХ.С
5 hours agoUkraine must be neutral for the security of Russia itself, otherwise, there would have been no war.109Reply1 reply

4 minutes agoif russia stayed in his country instead of being mad at ukraine for not being part of russia anymore,no war would have started and russia would not be losingReply
@bronkdog
5 hours agoSome say the territories are Russias number one concern. I believe it’s the ‘no nato ever’ is Russia’s priority concern.120Reply5 replies
@hansjorgkunde3772
59 minutes agoI think its both. Why else would they annex Cherson, Zaporozhye, Donbass and Luhansk region? This land is rich, Nova Rossija is 85% of the Ukrainian GDP. It was the powerhouse of Soviet military production and Ukraine was one of the major arms dealer before the war. Not even counted the '$3 trillion' in natural resources like Lithium, as the US claim. The region got the most fertile soil in Europe, Western Ukraine is good for sunflowers, the east is grain and all else.Reply
@loris9744
55 minutes agoIt's not just land its the pro Russian populationReply
@spamfilter32
50 minutes ago @hansjorgkunde3772  Russia only declared that they are going to annex the land in the last couple of months. Before that, there was no talk of it. The peace deal offered in 2022, that NATO forced Zelensky to reject (He was about to accept it) did not include the transfer of any land. The transfer of land is mostly about war reperations, the goal of the war is to permanently block NATO expansion.2Reply
@MotherAlgorithm
13 minutes agoSo is Finland next?Reply
@Worldturnedupsidedown
9 minutes ago​@spamfilter32 originally "some kind of autonomy for the Donbass but within Ukraine" that offer sounds pretty good. Why couldn't they have agreed something along those lines? There are several areas in Asia with similar agreements, surely that was better than the catastrophe that's unfolded sinceReply
@AlanThree001
5 hours agoRussia reject false truce.You missed a word.134Reply1 reply
@giordanabruna4825
1 hour agoReply
@marcomongke3116
5 hours agoI will be disappointed in Russia if they allow Ukraine to join NATO or not get Odessa at least. Let the conflict last for decades if needed.57Reply1 reply
@barneymagee3285
3 hours agoEasy said if you’re not in a trench…12Reply
@untitled2235
5 hours agowhy would russia give ukrainians time to regroup themselves?94Reply1 reply
@steveclapper5424
16 minutes agopeace will come with victory.Reply
@andrewmckenzie292
5 hours agoAnything less than a reasonable end to this conflict in Russian favour is condoning the actions of the west in Ukraine around 2014. In addition to the changes on the ground RU wishes to send a clear message that the US led neo empire will never extend to areas under Russia's historical sphere of influence, including Ukraine.50Reply1 reply
@garynew9637
5 hours agoBottom line friend.5Reply
@JesusOrDestruction
5 hours ago

|
|
|
| | |

|

|
|
| |
🚫 Russia Rejects The Truce ✂️ Main Road Cut Off 📰 Military Summary And...


|

|

|



No EU or NATO for Ukraine