MaxSolarRad (from pyephm) is not alligned with Solar-Rad from my Weatherstation

87 views
Skip to first unread message

Johannes Ebner

unread,
Oct 12, 2019, 11:37:00 AM10/12/19
to weewx-user
Hi,

I have yesterday installed pyephm on my Raspberry and enabled maxSolarRad.

I can see it already in my graphs, but the value is much below what is coming from my weather station. What could be the reason?

solarrad.JPG



Br,
Johannes

vince

unread,
Oct 12, 2019, 3:36:53 PM10/12/19
to weewx-user
On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 8:37:00 AM UTC-7, Johannes Ebner wrote:
I have yesterday installed pyephm on my Raspberry and enabled maxSolarRad.

I can see it already in my graphs, but the value is much below what is coming from my weather station. What could be the reason?



What kind of weather station ?
Many provide very incorrect values for radiation and brightness etc. 

Johannes Ebner

unread,
Oct 13, 2019, 2:12:08 AM10/13/19
to weewx-user
Its a WS3080

Br,
Johannes

gjr80

unread,
Oct 13, 2019, 7:16:47 PM10/13/19
to weewx-user
Hi,

Your station has a sensor that reports illuminance in lux and the fineoffset driver approximates solar insolation using a simple linear multiplier. From the comments in fousb.py:

Illuminance and Radiation
T
he 30xx stations include a sensor that reports illuminance (lux). The
conversion
from lux to radiation is a function of the angle of the sun and
altitude
, but this driver uses a single multiplier as an approximation.
 
Apparently the display on fine offset stations is incorrect. The display
reports radiation
with a lux-to-W/m^2 multiplier of 0.001464. Apparently
Cumulus and WeatherDisplay use a multiplier of 0.0079. The multiplier for
sea level
with sun directly overhead is 0.01075.
 
This driver uses the sea level multiplier of 0.01075. Use an entry in
StdCalibrate to adjust this for your location and altitude.

Let's not start a debate about the validity/accuracy of deriving solar insolation from illuminance, I will let you google that, but you can see there is some variation in multipliers used.

Bottom line is it is an approximation and if you want to vary the multiplier used you can (effectively) do so via a StdCalibrate correction.

Gary

Xant

unread,
Oct 17, 2019, 12:10:22 PM10/17/19
to weewx-user

Gary is correct to not initiate an Insolation vs Illuminance debate... been there, done that.

Please, refer to my previous posting and read the follow-up responses:


Xant
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages