Tom Keffer <
tke...@gmail.com> writes:
> 2. The algorithm for calculating heat index was changed to the new NWS
> algorithm <
https://www.wpc.ncep.noaa.gov/html/heatindex_equation.shtml>.
> I must admit, I don't like it either, because it can show values below
> sensible temperatures. I'm thinking of allowing the user to make a choice
> between algorithms.
Sounds good to give people choice of course. It seems the tricky thing
is various hardware calculations vs various algorithms in software and
how the defaults change that. And the difficult UI thing is to have
unambiguous but not enormous labels for the N kinds of varying
country-defined Heat Index formulas. It seems that "Heat Index" is no
longer a single concept. But HI-NWS is icky as a label.
I don't understand the notion that Heat Index must be >= temperature.
It seems Heat Index value X means it feels like X and Y% humidity, for
some specfied Y (50?). So with lower humidity than Y%, it makes sense
that it doesn't feel as hot as the actual temperature.
I think we're used to this strict relationship with wind chill, but
there the reference wind is 0, so wind chill is necessarily
always <= temp.