undefined local variable or method `response' (with Sinatra)

[doug livesey]

Hi -- I'm trying to cuke up a Sinatra app (generated with the default monk generator), and having a few problems.

My current one, that I've no idea how to resolve, is that I can't access the response object that I so take for granted in Rails.

Here is my env.rb

<env.rb>

app_file = File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), *%w[.. .. init.rb])

require app_file

# Force the application name because polyglot breaks the auto-detection logic.

Sinatra::Application.app_file = app_file

require 'spec/expectations'

require 'rack/test'

require 'webrat'

Webrat.configure do |config|

  config.mode = :rack

end

class MyWorld

  include Rack::Test::Methods

  include Webrat::Methods

  include Webrat::Matchers

  Webrat::Methods.delegate_to_session :response_code, :response_body

  def app

    Sinatra::Application

  end

end

World{MyWorld.new}

</env.rb>

Here is my feature file:

<test.feature>

Feature: Test

  

  I want to see if I can get Cucumber working with Sinatra.

  Scenario: Browsing to the root page

    Given I have browsed to the root page

    Then I should see "Hello, Cruel World!"

</test.feature>

And here is my steps file:

<test_steps.rb>

Given /^I have browsed to the root page$/ do

  visit( "/" )

end

Then /^I should see "([^\"]*)"$/ do |value|

  response.should contain( value )

end

</test_steps.rb>

The first step comes back green, but the second gives me the following error:

      undefined local variable or method `response' for #<MyWorld:0x1023d1d98> (NameError)

      features/test.feature:7:in `Then I should see "Hello, Cruel World!"'

Can anyone offer any advice on what to do to fix this, or where to look to gain more insight?

Thanks,

   Doug.

[Ben Lovell]

2009/10/14 doug livesey <bio...@gmail.com>

Hi -- I'm trying to cuke up a Sinatra app (generated with the default monk generator), and having a few problems.

try: last_response instead.

Cheers,

Ben

[doug livesey]

Perfect, thankyou!

Why did you suggest that?

   Doug.

2009/10/14 Ben Lovell <benjami...@gmail.com>

[Damian Janowski]

On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:23 PM, doug livesey <bio...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perfect, thankyou!
> Why did you suggest that?

Because that's what Rack::Test uses.